Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Cancer Immunology Essentials
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Toolbox: Coding and Computation
      • Toolbox: Signatures and Cells
      • "Best of" Collection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Immunology Research
Cancer Immunology Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Cancer Immunology Essentials
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Toolbox: Coding and Computation
      • Toolbox: Signatures and Cells
      • "Best of" Collection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Research Articles

A Bispecific Antibody Antagonizes Prosurvival CD40 Signaling and Promotes Vγ9Vδ2 T cell–Mediated Antitumor Responses in Human B-cell Malignancies

Iris de Weerdt, Roeland Lameris, George L. Scheffer, Jana Vree, Renate de Boer, Anita G. Stam, Rieneke van de Ven, Mark-David Levin, Steven T. Pals, Rob C. Roovers, Paul W.H.I. Parren, Tanja D. de Gruijl, Arnon P. Kater and Hans J. van der Vliet
Iris de Weerdt
1Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
2Department of Hematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roeland Lameris
1Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
George L. Scheffer
1Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jana Vree
1Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jana Vree
Renate de Boer
2Department of Hematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anita G. Stam
1Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rieneke van de Ven
1Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark-David Levin
3Department of Internal Medicine, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mark-David Levin
Steven T. Pals
4Department of Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
5Lymphoma and Myeloma Center Amsterdam (LYMMCARE), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rob C. Roovers
6Lava Therapeutics, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul W.H.I. Parren
6Lava Therapeutics, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
7Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Paul W.H.I. Parren
Tanja D. de Gruijl
1Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arnon P. Kater
2Department of Hematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
5Lymphoma and Myeloma Center Amsterdam (LYMMCARE), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hans J. van der Vliet
1Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Infection and Immunity Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
6Lava Therapeutics, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: h.vandervliet@lavatherapeutics.com jj.vandervliet@amsterdamumc.nl
DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-20-0138 Published January 2021
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Selection of CD40-specific VHHs. A, CD40 expression on wild-type (WT; gray, filled histogram) and CD40-transfected (black, open histogram) HEK293T cells. B, CD40 specificity of VHH binding. WT and CD40-transfected HEK293T cells were incubated with V12t, V15t, V19t (1 μmol/L), or medium control, and VHH binding was measured by flow-cytometric detection of the Myc tag. Representative histograms of three experiments. gMFI, geometric mean fluorescence intensity. C, CD40 expression on primary CLL cells. Representative histograms of five experiments. D, Binding of CD40-specific VHHs (1 μmol/L) to primary CLL cells as in B (n = 5). E, Primary CLL PBMCs were cultured with V12t, V15t, V19t (all 1 μmol/L), recombinant multimeric CD40L (100 ng/mL), or medium control and analyzed for CD86 and CD95 expression after 48 hours (n = 5). F, Primary CLL PBMCs were preincubated with V12t, V15t, V19t (all 1 μmol/L), or medium control for 30 minutes, and then cultured with recombinant multimeric CD40L (100 ng/mL) for 48 hours and analyzed for CD86 and CD95 expression after 48 hours (n = 9). Data, mean and SEM. *, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001. For D, repeated-measures one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett post hoc test compared with no VHH; for E and F, one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett post hoc test compared with medium control.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    The bispecific anti-CD40-Vδ2 VHHs induce target cell lysis. A, Binding of bispecific anti-CD40-Vδ2 VHHs. CD40-transfected or wild-type (WT) HEK293T cells were incubated with V12-5C8t, V15-5C8t, V19-5C8t (1 μmol/L), or medium control, and VHH binding was measured by flow-cytometric detection of the Myc tag. Representative histograms of two experiments. B, Specific lysis of the CII cell line after overnight culture with healthy donor–derived Vγ9Vδ2 T cells in a 1:2 effector:target ratio in the presence of the indicated concentrations of the bispecific anti-CD40-Vδ2 VHHs V12-5C8t, V15-5C8t, or V19-5C8t (n = 5). bsVHH, bispecific VHH. C, Specific lysis of primary CLL cells after overnight culture with healthy donor–derived Vγ9Vδ2 T cells in a 1:1 ratio in the presence of the indicated concentrations of the bispecific anti-CD40-Vδ2 VHHs V12-5C8t, V15-5C8t, or V19-5C8t (n = 3). Specific lysis was calculated by correcting for background cell death in conditions without Vγ9Vδ2 T cells. Data, mean and range, with the line depicting a nonlinear regression curve. B and C, Nonlinear regression analysis; “0” value entered as 10−4.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    The bispecific anti-CD40-Vδ2 VHH has a high binding affinity and potently activates Vγ9Vδ2 T cells. A, Binding of the bispecific anti-CD40-Vδ2 VHH to Vγ9Vδ2 T cells and CD40+ cells. Healthy donor–derived Vγ9Vδ2 T cells (green, n = 3 donors) or CII cells (black, triplicate) were incubated with the indicated concentrations of V19-5C8, and VHH binding was measured by flow-cytometric detection of anti-llama IgG heavy- and light-chain antibodies; geometric mean fluorescence plotted. bsVHH, bispecific VHH; gMFI, geometric mean fluorescence intensity. B, Activation of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells by the bispecific anti-CD40-Vδ2 VHH. Healthy donor–derived Vγ9Vδ2 T cells and CII target cells were cultured in a 1:1 ratio with V19-5C8 for 4 hours in the presence of Brefeldin A, GolgiStop, and anti-CD107a to measure IFNγ, TNF, and IL2 production and degranulation by flow cytometry (n = 3). C, Specific lysis of CII or MM.1s target cells after overnight culture with healthy donor–derived Vγ9Vδ2 T cells in a 1:1 ratio in the presence of V19-5C8 (circles) or the irrelevant bispecific anti-CD1d-Vδ2 VHH 1d7-5C8 (squares; all n = 4). Specific lysis was calculated by correcting for background cell death in conditions with Vγ9Vδ2 T cells, without bispecific VHH. D, Specific lysis of wild-type (WT) or CD40-transfected HEK293T cells as in C (n = 4). Specific lysis was calculated by correcting for background cell death in conditions without Vγ9Vδ2 T cells. Data, mean and range, with the line depicting a nonlinear regression curve (A–C) or mean and SEM (D). ****, P < 0.0001. For A–C, nonlinear regression analysis; for D, mixed-effects analysis with Šidák post hoc test comparing CD40-transfected versus WT.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    The bispecific anti-CD40-Vδ2 VHH activates Vγ9Vδ2 T cells from CLL patients and induces autologous tumor lysis. A, Specific lysis of primary CLL cells after overnight culture with healthy donor–derived Vγ9Vδ2 T cells in a 1:1 ratio in the presence of V19-5C8 (n = 10). B, CLL PBMCs were cultured on irradiated 3T3 or CD40L+ 3T40L fibroblasts for 72 hours. Specific cell death of harvested CLL PBMCs after subsequent overnight culture with healthy donor–derived Vγ9Vδ2 T cells (1:1 ratio), healthy donor–derived Vγ9Vδ2 T cells and V19-5C8 (1:1 ratio, 100 nmol/L), venetoclax (10 nmol/L), or medium control (n = 3). C–E, CLL PBMCs were preincubated with 10, 100, or 1,000 nmol/L V19-5C8 or medium control for 30 minutes and then cultured in the presence of recombinant multimeric CD40L (100 ng/mL) for 48 hours. C, CD86 and CD95 expression after 48 hours (n = 6). D, Specific cell death after subsequent culture with the indicated concentrations of venetoclax for 24 hours (n = 6). E, Bcl-xL expression after 48 hours (n = 3). F and G, PBMCs from CLL patients were enriched for T cells by depletion of CD19+ CLL cells and then cultured with CD19+ CLL cells in a 1:1 ratio with V19-5C8 (10 nmol/L), aminobisphosphonates (ABP; 25 μmol/L pamidronate), or medium control in the presence of Brefeldin A, GolgiStop, and anti-CD107a to measure IFNγ production (F) and degranulation (G) by flow cytometry (n = 7). H, Lysis of primary CLL cells by autologous Vγ9Vδ2 T cells. CD3+ cells were isolated from CLL PBMCs and cultured with total CLL PBMCs in a 5:1 (CD3:PBMC; ±1:20 Vδ2:PBMC ratio; range, 1:10–1:24) or 20:1 (CD3:PBMC; ±1:3 Vδ2:PBMC ratio; range, 1:3–1:6) ratio with V19-5C8 (10 nmol/L) or medium control. Live CLL cells were quantified by flow cytometry using counting beads (n = 5). I, Percentage Vγ9Vδ2 T cells after PBMCs were cultured with IL2 (50 IU/mL) or IL2 and the bispecific VHH V19-5C8 (10 nmol/L) for 1 week (n = 5). Data, mean and SEM. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001. For A, C, and E–H, repeated-measures one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett post hoc test compared with conditions without VHH; for B, two-way ANOVA followed by Šidák post hoc test comparing each treatment condition between the CLL groups; for D, two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett post hoc test comparing conditions to medium control; and for I, paired t test.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    The bispecific anti-CD40-Vδ2 VHH is active against primary MM. A, CD40 expression on primary MM cells. Representative histogram of four donors tested. B, BM of MM patients was cultured overnight in the presence or absence of healthy donor–derived Vγ9Vδ2 T cells in a 1:1 (Vγ9Vδ2-T:plasma cell) ratio in the presence of the bispecific VHH V19-5C8 (10 pmol/L or 10 nmol/L). Live plasma cells were quantified by flow cytometry using counting beads (n = 5). C and D, Mononuclear cells from the BM of MM patients were cultured overnight with V19-5C8 (10 nmol/L), aminobisphosphonate (ABP; 10 μmol/L zoledronic acid), or medium control in the presence of Brefeldin A, GolgiStop, and anti-CD107a to measure cytokine production (C) and degranulation (D) by flow cytometry (n = 6). Data, mean and SEM. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. B–D, Repeated-measures one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett post hoc test compared with conditions without VHH.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    The bispecific anti-CD40-Vδ2 VHH prolongs survival in vivo. Immunodeficient mice were irradiated on day −1 and grafted (i.v.) with 2.5 × 106 MM.1s cells on day 0. Mice received PBS or human Vγ9Vδ2 T cells (1 × 107 cells; i.v.) on days 7, 14, and 21, followed by PBS or V19-5C8 (5 μg per mouse; i.p.) twice weekly starting on day 9. A, Schematic overview of treatment schedule. B, Kaplan–Meier analyses of mouse survival (control: n = 6; bispecific VHH: n = 6; Vγ9Vδ2 T cells: n = 8; bispecific VHH + Vγ9Vδ2 T cells: n = 8). C, Body weight after 7 weeks of treatment relative to individual body weight at time of tumor injection. **, P < 0.01. Data, mean and SD. B, Mantel–Cox log-rank test followed by Holm–Šidák post hoc test.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
  • Table 1.

    CLL patient characteristics.

    N44
    Age in years69.5 (range, 39–89)
    Sex, % female36.4
    IGHV, % M-CLL55.2 (for 29 known)
    Rai, % stage 067.9 (for 28 known)
    ALC × 109/L66.0 (13.1–422)
    • Note: Data presented as a percentage or median (range).

    • Abbreviations: ALC, absolute leukocyte count; M-CLL, CLL cells with a mutated IGHV status.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplementary Data

    • Supplementary Figures - Supplementary Figures
    • Supplementary Tables and Figure Legends - Supplementary Tables 1-2 and Figure legends
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Immunology Research: 9 (1)
January 2021
Volume 9, Issue 1
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Editorial Board (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Immunology Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Bispecific Antibody Antagonizes Prosurvival CD40 Signaling and Promotes Vγ9Vδ2 T cell–Mediated Antitumor Responses in Human B-cell Malignancies
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Immunology Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Immunology Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A Bispecific Antibody Antagonizes Prosurvival CD40 Signaling and Promotes Vγ9Vδ2 T cell–Mediated Antitumor Responses in Human B-cell Malignancies
Iris de Weerdt, Roeland Lameris, George L. Scheffer, Jana Vree, Renate de Boer, Anita G. Stam, Rieneke van de Ven, Mark-David Levin, Steven T. Pals, Rob C. Roovers, Paul W.H.I. Parren, Tanja D. de Gruijl, Arnon P. Kater and Hans J. van der Vliet
Cancer Immunol Res January 1 2021 (9) (1) 50-61; DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-20-0138

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A Bispecific Antibody Antagonizes Prosurvival CD40 Signaling and Promotes Vγ9Vδ2 T cell–Mediated Antitumor Responses in Human B-cell Malignancies
Iris de Weerdt, Roeland Lameris, George L. Scheffer, Jana Vree, Renate de Boer, Anita G. Stam, Rieneke van de Ven, Mark-David Levin, Steven T. Pals, Rob C. Roovers, Paul W.H.I. Parren, Tanja D. de Gruijl, Arnon P. Kater and Hans J. van der Vliet
Cancer Immunol Res January 1 2021 (9) (1) 50-61; DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-20-0138
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Authors' Disclosures
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Myeloid-Targeted CXCR2 Deletion Improves Antitumor Immunity
  • Metabolic Screening of CD8+ T Cells
  • Nutlin-3a: An Immune-Checkpoint Activator for NK Cells in Neuroblastoma
Show more Research Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Cancer Immunology Essentials

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Immunology Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Immunology Research
eISSN: 2326-6074
ISSN: 2326-6066

Advertisement