Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Cancer Immunology Essentials
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Toolbox: Coding and Computation
      • Toolbox: Signatures and Cells
      • "Best of" Collection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Immunology Research
Cancer Immunology Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Cancer Immunology Essentials
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Toolbox: Coding and Computation
      • Toolbox: Signatures and Cells
      • "Best of" Collection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Research Articles

An Antibody Targeting ICOS Increases Intratumoral Cytotoxic to Regulatory T-cell Ratio and Induces Tumor Regression

Richard C.A. Sainson, Anil K. Thotakura, Miha Kosmac, Gwenoline Borhis, Nahida Parveen, Rachael Kimber, Joana Carvalho, Simon J. Henderson, Kerstin L. Pryke, Tracey Okell, Siobhan O'Leary, Stuart Ball, Cassie Van Krinks, Lauriane Gamand, Emma Taggart, Eleanor J. Pring, Hanif Ali, Hannah Craig, Vivian W.Y. Wong, Qi Liang, Robert J. Rowlands, Morgane Lecointre, Jamie Campbell, Ian Kirby, David Melvin, Volker Germaschewski, Elisabeth Oelmann, Sonia Quaratino and Matthew McCourt
Richard C.A. Sainson
Kymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Richard C.A. Sainson
  • For correspondence: richard.sainson@kymab.com
Anil K. Thotakura
Kymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Miha Kosmac
Kymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Miha Kosmac
Gwenoline Borhis
Kymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nahida Parveen
Kymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachael Kimber
Kymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joana Carvalho
Kymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon J. Henderson
Kymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kerstin L. Pryke
Kymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tracey Okell
Kymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Siobhan O'Leary
Kymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stuart Ball
Kymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cassie Van Krinks
Kymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lauriane Gamand
Kymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emma Taggart
Kymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Emma Taggart
Eleanor J. Pring
Kymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Eleanor J. Pring
Hanif Ali
Kymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hannah Craig
Kymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vivian W.Y. Wong
Kymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qi Liang
Kymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert J. Rowlands
Kymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Morgane Lecointre
Kymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jamie Campbell
Kymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ian Kirby
Kymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Melvin
Kymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Volker Germaschewski
Kymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elisabeth Oelmann
Kymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sonia Quaratino
Kymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew McCourt
Kymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-20-0034 Published December 2020
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    ICOS expression in cancer Tregs. A, Density plots showing the combined Icos and Foxp3 expression in solid tumors (TCGA datasets). Combined expression was scored using ssGSEA. The median ssGSEA score (marked by vertical ticks) is shown. The TCGA standard cancer type abbreviations were used. B, Immune response genes were sequenced in PBMCs and tumors from patients with NSCLC. Cells were classified into one of 27 immunologic subtypes (Supplementary Table S1). Left, heatmap of scaled gene expression in T cells from PBMCs and tumors from NSCLC patient samples (n = 5). Each gene was scaled individually across all cells of the dataset, and the mean scaled expression for each of 17 T-cell subtypes is presented. Right, scatter plots showing ICOS mRNA expression in Treg, CD4non-Treg, CD8, and all other T cells. Each dot corresponds to a single cell. Full lines indicate the mean ICOS gene expression of the total cell compartment, and the dashed lines indicate the mode (density peak) of ICOS+ cells. C, Relative ICOS expression (flow cytometry) on CD4+, CD8+, and Treg (CD4+/FOXP3+) in healthy donor PBMCs (n = 5), NSCLC tumor samples (n = 5), and matched NSCLC patient PBMCs (n = 4; two-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple comparison). D, Graph showing the density of ICOS+ cells per mm2 in tumor cores (n = 995) from six indications and matching healthy tissues (n = 48; Mann–Whitney unpaired t test). E, Example of ICOS/FOXP3 staining of gastric tumor core showing (i) original whole core image with ICOS staining in purple and FOXP3 in brown; (ii) classifier analysis overlays showing tissue region of interest (lilac) and white space (white); (iii) cellular analysis overlay showing single FOXP3 positive (green overlay), single ICOS positive (red overlay), and ICOS/FOXP3 dual positive (cyan overlay); and (iv–vi) 20× magnified detailed area. F, Quantification of ICOS/FOXP3 double-positive cells per mm2 from the tumor cores (n = 995) from the six indications.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    KY1044 hIgG1 triggered ADCC and had costimulatory properties. A, ADCC cell reporter assay with KY1044. KY1044 hIgG1 or the isotype control was incubated with FcgRIIIA Jurkat reporter cells and ICOS+CHO cells as target cells. B, KY1044 induced ADCC in a human primary NK cell assay. KY1044 or isotype control was coincubated with dye-loaded ICOS+ CEM target cells and NK cells for 4 hours. ADCC activity was quantified by measuring Specific Dye Release upon target killing and normalized to percentage of maximum lysis compared with the positive control, a digitonin-based lysis buffer (mean of triplicates ± SEM). For A and B, the vertical dotted line indicates 100 ng/mL. Plate-bound (C) and cross-linked soluble (D) KY1044 induced the release of IFNγ from MJ cells. For C and D, the vertical dotted line indicates 10 μg/mL. The concentration of IFNγ was assessed in the supernatant of MJ cells cultured for 72 hours. E and F, Levels of IFNγ induced in human primary T cells activated with anti-CD3/CD28 (to induce ICOS) and cultured with either 5 μg/mL of plate-bound KY1044 or the isotype control IgG1 (E; n = 10) or with either 15 μg/mL of soluble KY1044 or soluble isotype control with or without the addition of Fc cross-linking anti-human F(ab')2 Fragments (F; n = 10). G, Cytokine production by KY1044 requires anti-CD3. Levels of TNFα in T-cell culture with 5 μg/mL of KY1044 or isotype control IgG1 (plate bound; n = 8) in the presence or not of anti-CD3 (Wilcoxon statistic test for E, F, and G). H, RNA-sequencing analysis comparing T-cell stimulation with either KY1044 + anti-CD3 or control (anti-CD3 only). (i) Genes reported to be downstream of ICOS signaling showed a pattern of upregulation following KY1044 costimulation, with significant P values obtained for Ifng, Il10 and Il4. (ii) Metascape pathway enrichment analysis of the differentially expressed genes. Enriched gene sets were ranked on the basis of the significance of their P values. (iii) Heatmap showing unsupervised clustering of samples based on the expression levels of the top gene ontology terms from the Metascape enrichment analysis. IC, isotype control.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Effect of KY1044 mIgG2 in the A20 and J558 tumor models. A, Spider plots of a representative experiment showing individual A20 tumor volumes (n = 10 per group). Tumor-bearing mice were dosed intraperitoneally with 200 μg of KY1044 mIgG2a or 200 μL saline starting from day 8 following tumor cell implantation. B, Spider plots showing individual J558 tumor volumes (n = 7 per group). Tumor-bearing mice were dosed intraperitoneally with 60 μg of KY1044 mIgG2a or 200 μL saline starting from day 9 following tumor cell implantation. The dosing days are indicated by vertical dotted lines. The survival curves depicting the control and KY1044 mIgG2a groups are shown. Statistics were calculated using log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test. Data are representative of at least two experiments.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    KY1044 mIgG2a improved the efficacy of anti–PD-L1. A, Survival curves of mice harboring CT26.WT tumors and treated with control, KY1044 mIgG2a monotherapy at 60 μg/dose, anti–PD-L1 mIgG2a monotherapy at 200 μg/dose, and the combination of KY1044 mIgG2a and anti–PD-L1 mIgG2a at 60 and 200 μg/dose, respectively (left). The dosing days are indicated by vertical dotted lines. Statistics were calculated using log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test. The data are representative of six independent experiments. Tumor-bearing mice that cleared CT26.WT tumors were randomly allocated to two groups and rechallenged with either CT26.WT or EMT6 cells (right). B, Effect of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell depletion on antitumor efficacy. Mice implanted with CT26.WT cells (n = 10 per group) were depleted of CD8+ and/or CD4+ T cells and treated with saline or with KY1044 mIgG2a and anti–PD-L1 mIgG2a combination as described in A. Data are representative of two independent experiments.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    KY1044 depleted ICOShigh T cells in vivo. A, In vivo experimental protocol of the pharmacodynamic study in the CT26.WT tumor–bearing mice. Mice were dosed twice with saline or KY1044 mIgG2a (ranging from 0.3–10 mg/kg) on days 13 and 15, and the tumor and spleen were harvested on day 16 and the immune cells analyzed by FACS. Effect of KY1044 on Treg depletion (plotted as a percentage of live cells) and on the CD8+ TEff to Treg cell ratio in the TME (B) and in the spleen (C) of treated mice (n = 7/8 mice per groups). D, Relative expression of ICOS and frequency of T-cell subsets in the blood of NHP (the number of datapoints are indicated in brackets). The percentages indicate the frequency of each cell types within CD3/CD4 T cells in NHP PBMCs. geoMFI, geometric mean fluorescence intensity. E–G, Graphs showing the changes (vs. baseline pretreatment) of total CD4 TM cells and follicular Th cells in the blood of NHP over time following a single-dose of KY1044 human IgG1 at 0, 10, 30, and 100 mg/kg (n = 3 NHP per groups).

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    KY1044 mIgG2a activated intratumoral T cells in vivo. A, Effect of KY1044 mIgG2a on intratumoral CD8+ T-cell expression of CD69 and CD44 (n = 7/8 mice per groups). Measurement of CD69 and CD69/CD44 double-positive cells was performed 24 hours after a second dose of KY1044 mIgG2a (see Fig. 5A). B, Graphs showing the flow cytometry analysis of intracellular IFNγ and/or TNFα expression in intratumoral CD8+ and CD4+ T cells from CT26.WT tumor collected 7 days after a single intraperitoneal injection of saline or KY1044 mIgG2a at 3 mg/kg. Groups of mice (n = 4 mice/group; Tukey multiple comparisons test).

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Improved combination efficacy with anti–PD-L1 was obtained at intermediate dose of KY1044 mIgG2a. Spider plots from a representative experiment showing individual mouse tumor volumes from BALB/c mice (n = 9 per group) harboring subcutaneous CT26.WT tumors and treated with different doses of KY1044 mIgG2a [20 (A), 60 (B), and 200 (C) μg/dose] with a fixed dose of anti–PD-L1 mIgG2a (200 μg/dose). D, Kaplan–Meier plot depicting the survival of mice injected with CT26.WT tumor and treated with different doses of the KY1044 mIgG2a/anti–PD-L1 combination. The dosing days are indicated by vertical dotted lines.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplementary Data

    • Supplementary Figures - Supplementary Figures 1-9
    • Supplementary Table 1 - Genes used to define Immune cell subtypes
    • Supplementary Table 2 - Metadata for the 5 NSCLC patients
    • Supplementary Figures and Tables Legend - Figure and tables legends of supplementary data
    • Supplementary Movie 1 - AntilCOS
    • Supplementary Movie 2 - Isotype control
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Immunology Research: 8 (12)
December 2020
Volume 8, Issue 12
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Editorial Board (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Immunology Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
An Antibody Targeting ICOS Increases Intratumoral Cytotoxic to Regulatory T-cell Ratio and Induces Tumor Regression
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Immunology Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Immunology Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
An Antibody Targeting ICOS Increases Intratumoral Cytotoxic to Regulatory T-cell Ratio and Induces Tumor Regression
Richard C.A. Sainson, Anil K. Thotakura, Miha Kosmac, Gwenoline Borhis, Nahida Parveen, Rachael Kimber, Joana Carvalho, Simon J. Henderson, Kerstin L. Pryke, Tracey Okell, Siobhan O'Leary, Stuart Ball, Cassie Van Krinks, Lauriane Gamand, Emma Taggart, Eleanor J. Pring, Hanif Ali, Hannah Craig, Vivian W.Y. Wong, Qi Liang, Robert J. Rowlands, Morgane Lecointre, Jamie Campbell, Ian Kirby, David Melvin, Volker Germaschewski, Elisabeth Oelmann, Sonia Quaratino and Matthew McCourt
Cancer Immunol Res December 1 2020 (8) (12) 1568-1582; DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-20-0034

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
An Antibody Targeting ICOS Increases Intratumoral Cytotoxic to Regulatory T-cell Ratio and Induces Tumor Regression
Richard C.A. Sainson, Anil K. Thotakura, Miha Kosmac, Gwenoline Borhis, Nahida Parveen, Rachael Kimber, Joana Carvalho, Simon J. Henderson, Kerstin L. Pryke, Tracey Okell, Siobhan O'Leary, Stuart Ball, Cassie Van Krinks, Lauriane Gamand, Emma Taggart, Eleanor J. Pring, Hanif Ali, Hannah Craig, Vivian W.Y. Wong, Qi Liang, Robert J. Rowlands, Morgane Lecointre, Jamie Campbell, Ian Kirby, David Melvin, Volker Germaschewski, Elisabeth Oelmann, Sonia Quaratino and Matthew McCourt
Cancer Immunol Res December 1 2020 (8) (12) 1568-1582; DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-20-0034
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Myeloid-Targeted CXCR2 Deletion Improves Antitumor Immunity
  • Metabolic Screening of CD8+ T Cells
  • Nutlin-3a: An Immune-Checkpoint Activator for NK Cells in Neuroblastoma
Show more Research Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Cancer Immunology Essentials

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Immunology Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Immunology Research
eISSN: 2326-6074
ISSN: 2326-6066

Advertisement