Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Cancer Immunology Essentials
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Toolbox: Coding and Computation
      • Toolbox: Signatures and Cells
      • "Best of" Collection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Immunology Research
Cancer Immunology Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Cancer Immunology Essentials
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Toolbox: Coding and Computation
      • Toolbox: Signatures and Cells
      • "Best of" Collection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Research Articles

Tumor Cell–Derived TGFβ1 Attenuates Antitumor Immune Activity of T Cells via Regulation of PD-1 mRNA

Pengfei Wu, Bo Geng, Qun Chen, Enyang Zhao, Jiang Liu, Chen Sun, Caijun Zha, Yong Shao, Bosen You, Wenfu Zhang, Lulu Li, Xiangqi Meng, Jinquan Cai and Xuedong Li
Pengfei Wu
1Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
2Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Neuroscience Institute, Heilongjiang Academy of Medical Sciences, Harbin, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bo Geng
1Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qun Chen
3Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Enyang Zhao
1Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jiang Liu
1Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chen Sun
1Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Caijun Zha
4Department of Laboratory Diagnosis, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yong Shao
1Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bosen You
1Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wenfu Zhang
1Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lulu Li
2Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Neuroscience Institute, Heilongjiang Academy of Medical Sciences, Harbin, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiangqi Meng
2Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Neuroscience Institute, Heilongjiang Academy of Medical Sciences, Harbin, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jinquan Cai
2Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Neuroscience Institute, Heilongjiang Academy of Medical Sciences, Harbin, China.
5Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology (MTC), Biomedicum, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jinquan.cai@ki.se xdli1010@163.com
Xuedong Li
1Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jinquan.cai@ki.se xdli1010@163.com
DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-20-0113 Published December 2020
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    TGFβ1 prolongs PD-1 mRNA half-life in an SRSF3/5-dependent manner in T cells. A, qRT-PCR analysis of PD-1 mRNAs in CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated) stimulated with TGFβ1 (10 ng/mL) for the indicated time points. B, CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated) were stimulated with TGFβ1 (10 ng/mL) prior to incubation with ActD (5 μg/mL), and the remaining PD-1 mRNA or control TNF, IL10, β-actin, and α-tubulin mRNAs were quantified. The half-lives were determined from three independent experiments. Data were analyzed using Student t test. C, Schematic indicating the construction of the Tet-off system. PDCD1, gene for PD-1; tTA, Tet transactivator. D, HEK293 Tet-off cells were transfected with inducible Tet-off PD-1 plasmids and stimulated with TGFβ1 for 24 hours. Doxycycline (1 μg/mL) was added, the remaining PD-1 mRNA was quantified, and the half-life was determined from three independent experiments. Data were analyzed using Student t test. E, A heatmap revealing potential protein binding sites in the PD-1 mRNA 3′-UTR. F, Western blot analysis of HEK293 Tet-off cells transfected with inducible Tet-off PD-1 plasmids and then transfected with pcDNA3, CUG-BP, SRSF1, HNRNPA1, SRSF5, SRSF9, MBNL1, YBX1, or SRSF3 plasmids. Doxycycline (1 μg/mL) was added, the remaining PD-1 mRNA was quantified, and the half-life was determined from three independent experiments. Data were analyzed using Student t test. G, Western blot of the indicated proteins in CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated) stimulated with TGFβ1 (10 ng/mL) for 24 hours. H, CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated) were transfected with siSRSF3 and/or siSRSF5 prior to incubation with ActD (5 μg/mL) for the indicated times, and the remaining PD-1 mRNA or control TNF, IL10, β-actin, and α-tubulin mRNAs were quantified. The half-lives were determined from three independent experiments. Data were analyzed using Student t test. All data are presented as the mean ± SD and are representative of three independent experiments. Significant results are presented as ns, nonsignificant; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. Dox, doxycycline.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    The P38-SRSF3/5 axis activated by ccRCC-derived TGFβ1 prolongs the PD-1 mRNA half-life in T cells. A, Western blot analysis of the indicated proteins in CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated) stimulated with TGFβ1 (10 ng/mL) for 24 hours. B, CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated) were transfected with MKK6EE for 24 hours prior to incubation with ActD (5 μg/mL) for the indicated times, and the remaining PD-1 mRNA or control TNF, IL10, β-actin, and α-tubulin mRNAs were quantified. The half-lives were determined from three independent experiments. Data were analyzed using Student t test. C, CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated) were transfected with MKK6EE and treated with SB203580 (10 μmol/L) for 24 hours prior to incubation with ActD (5 μg/mL) for the indicated times, and the remaining PD-1 mRNA or control TNF, IL10, β-actin, and α-tubulin mRNAs were quantified. The half-lives were determined from three independent experiments. Data were analyzed using Student t test. D and E, CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated) with P38 knockdown (KD) or treated with an inhibitor were stimulated with TGFβ1 (10 ng/mL) for 24 hours prior to incubation with ActD (5 μg/mL) for the indicated times, and the remaining PD-1 mRNA or control TNF, IL10, β-actin, and α-tubulin mRNAs were quantified. The half-lives were determined from three independent experiments. Data were analyzed using Student t test. F, Western blot analysis of the indicated proteins in CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated) transfected with MKK6EE or treated with SB203580 (10 μmol/L) for 24 hours. All data are presented as the mean ± SD and are representative of three independent experiments. Significant results are presented as ns, nonsignificant; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    TGFβ1 activated the p38/p-Ser10 H3 axis to increase SRSF3/5 levels by recruiting p65 in T cells. A and B, Western blot analysis of the indicated proteins in CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated) stimulated with TGFβ1 (10 ng/mL) for the indicated times. C, Western blot of the indicated proteins in CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated) stimulated with TGFβ1 (10 ng/mL) for 24 hours and then treated with SB203580 (10 μmol/L) for the indicated times.D, ChIP-PCR analysis of the enrichment of p-Ser10 H3 in the SRSF3 and SRSF5 promoter regions in CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated) stimulated with TGFβ1 (10 ng/mL) for 24 hours. E, ChIP-PCR analysis of the enrichment of p-Ser10 H3 in the SRSF3 and SRSF5 promoter regions in CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated) stimulated with TGFβ1 for 24 hours and then treated with SB203580 (10 μmol/L) for 24 hours. F, Immunofluorescence of SRSF3 and SRSF5 in CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated) stimulated with TGFβ1 (10 ng/mL) for 24 hours. Scale bar, 25 μm. G, Immunofluorescence of SRSF3 and SRSF5 in CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated) stimulated with TGFβ1 (10 ng/mL) for 24 hours and then treated with SB203580 (10 μmol/L) for 24 hours. Scale bar, 25 μm. H, CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated) with p65 overexpression (OE) were followed by ActD (5 μg/mL) for indicated times, and the remaining PD-1 mRNA or control TNF, IL10, β-actin, and α-tubulin mRNAs were quantified. The half-lives were determined from three independent experiments. Data were analyzed using Student t test. I, CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated) were transfected with MKK6EE and then treated with QNZ (11 nmol/L) for 24 hours prior to incubation with ActD (5 μg/mL) for the indicated times. The remaining PD-1 mRNA or control TNF, IL10, β-actin, and α-tubulin mRNAs were quantified, and the half-lives were determined from three independent experiments. Data were analyzed using Student t test. J, Predicted p65 binding sites in the promoter region of SRSF3 and SRSF5 in the JASPAR database. K and L, ChIP-PCR analysis of the enrichment of p65 in the SRSF3 and SRSF5 promoter regions in CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28-activated) transfected with MKK6EE or scramble for 24 hours. M, Luciferase activity of GV272-SRSF3 and GV272-SRSF5 in CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs (anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated) transfected with pcDNA3-p65, pcDNA3-mut, or pcDNA3 plasmids (n = 3). Data were analyzed using Student t test. N, Western blot analysis of the indicated proteins in CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated) overexpressing p65 or treated with QNZ (11 nmol/L) for 24 hours. O, Top, EMSA of TGFβ1-induced NF-κB activation in CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated). Bottom, ChIP-PCR assay of the enrichment of p65 in the SRSF3 and SRSF5 promoter regions in CD8+ T cells (anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated) stimulated with TGFβ1 (10 ng/mL) for the indicated times. P, ChIP-PCR analysis of the enrichment of p65 in the SRSF3 and SRSF5 promoter regions in CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated) treated with SB203580 (10 μmol/L) for 24 hours. All data are presented as the mean ± SD and are representative of three independent experiments. Significant results are presented as ns, nonsignificant; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. Scra, scramble.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    SRSF3 binding with NXF1 promotes extranuclear transport of PD-1 mRNA in T cells. A, Schematic diagram of the nuclear and cytoplasmic RNA extraction process. qRT-PCR analysis of the nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions of PD-1 mRNA after knocking down or overexpressing SRSF3 in CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28-activated). Data were analyzed using Student t test. B, qRT-PCR analysis of the nascent PD-1 mRNA level in the nucleus or cytoplasm after knockdown of SRSF3 expression in CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated). Data were analyzed using Student t test. C, RIP-PCR analysis of the enrichment of SRSF3 on PD-1 mRNA after knocking down P38 expression in CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated). Data were analyzed using Student t test. D, RIP-PCR analysis of the enrichment of SRSF3 on PD-1 mRNA in CD8+ T cells (anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated) stimulated with TGFβ1 (10 ng/mL) for 24 hours. Data were analyzed using Student t test. E, RIP-PCR analysis of the enrichment of SRSF3 on the 3′-UTR of PD-1 mRNA after overexpression of SRSF3 in CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated). Data were analyzed using Student t test. F, qRT-PCR analysis of the nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions of WT-PD-1 and ΔSRSF3-PD-1 mRNAs after knocking down SRSF3 expression in CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated). Data were analyzed using Student t test. G, Top, co-IP analysis of CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated) with an antibody against SRSF3, followed by labeling with an anti-NXF1. Bottom, co-IP with an antibody against NXF1, followed by labeling with an anti-SRSF3. H, Co-IP analysis of SRSF3-knockdown CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated) with an antibody against SRSF3, followed by labeling with an anti-NXF1. I, Co-IP analysis of CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated) stimulated with TGFβ1 for 24 hours and immunoprecipitated with an antibody against SRSF3, followed by labeling with an anti-NXF1. J, RIP-PCR analysis of the enrichment of NXF1 or SRSF3 on WT-PD-1 and ΔSRSF3-PD-1 mRNAs in CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated). Data were analyzed using Student t test. K, RIP-PCR analysis of the enrichment of SRSF3 on the 3′-UTR of PD-1 mRNA after overexpression of NFX1 in CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated). Data were analyzed using Student t test. L, qRT-PCR analysis of the nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions of WT-PD-1 and ΔSRSF3-PD-1 mRNAs after knocking down NFX1 expression in CD8+ T cells isolated from PBMCs of healthy donors (n = 3, anti-CD3/anti-CD28 activated). Data were analyzed using Student t test. All data are presented as the mean ± SD and are representative of three independent experiments. Significant results are presented as ns, nonsignificant; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. KD, knockdown; Scra, scramble.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    TGFβ1 induced SRSF3 to restrict the antitumor capability of T cells in ccRCC. A, Schematic diagram of the orthotopic ccRCC model and treatment. FCM, flow cytometry. B, Bioluminescence images of BALB/c mice at day 24 in the knockdown scramble plus IgG (KD_Scra + IgG), knockdown scramble plus anti–PD-L1 (KD_Scra + anti–PD-L1), knockdown TGFβ1 plus IgG (KD_TGFβ1 + IgG), and knockdown TGFβ1 plus anti–PD-L1 (KD_TGFβ1 + anti–PD-L1) groups (n = 12/group). C, Quantification of bioluminescence imaging signal intensities in BALB/c mice from B (n = 12/group). Data were analyzed using Student t test. D, Kaplan–Meier survival curves for the BALB/c mice from B. Data were analyzed using log-rank test. E, Density plots of Pd-1 and Srsf3 among tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells in the mice from B. Data represent three independent experiments. Data were analyzed using Student t test. F, Schematic diagram of adoptive cell transfer therapy for ccRCC in mice (n = 8/group). i.p., intraperitoneal; i.v., intravenous; s.c., subcutaneous. G, Transferred OTI CD8+ T cells overexpressing Srsf3 were analyzed in the dLNs and non-dLNs at day 25. Data were analyzed using Student t test. H, The Ki-67 and PD-1 expression of transferred CD8+ T cells overexpressing Srsf3 was analyzed in the dLNs at day 25. Data were analyzed using Student t test. I, Tumor volume of BALB/c mice in the PBS, overexpression scramble plus IgG (OE_Scra + IgG), overexpression Srsf3 plus IgG (OE_Srsf3 + IgG), overexpression scramble plus anti–PD-1 (OE_Scra + anti–PD-1), and overexpression Srsf3 plus anti–PD-1 (OE_Srsf3 + anti–PD-1) groups (n = 8/group). Data were analyzed using Student t test. J, Kaplan–Meier survival curves for the BALB/c mice from I. Data were analyzed using log-rank test. All data are presented as the mean ± SD and are representative of three independent experiments. Significant results are presented as ns, nonsignificant; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. KD, knockdown; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; Scra, scramble.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Mechanism by which ccRCC-derived TGFβ1 extends the half-life and mediates the nuclear export of PD-1 mRNA in T cells. Left, TGFβ1 attenuates the antitumor immune activity by prolonging the half-life of PD-1 mRNA and promoting PD-1 mRNA nuclear export in CD8+ T cells. Right, inhibition of TGFβ1 in ccRCC reduces the stability of PD-1 mRNA and decreases extranuclear transport in CD8+ T cells. Blue arrows indicate the increase (up) or decrease (down) of RNA/protein expression, molecular activity, or extranuclear transport. Black arrows indicate the direction and steps of regulation. Red “p” indicates “phosphorylation.”

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplementary Data

    • Supplementary Tables and Figures: Table S1, Table S2, Table S3, Table S4, Table S5, Table S6, Figure S1, Figure S2, Figure S3, Figure S4, Figure S5, Figure S6 - Supplementary Tables and Figures: Table S1, Table S2, Table S3, Table S4, Table S5, Table S6, Figure S1, Figure S2, Figure S3, Figure S4, Figure S5, Figure S6
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Immunology Research: 8 (12)
December 2020
Volume 8, Issue 12
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Editorial Board (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Immunology Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Tumor Cell–Derived TGFβ1 Attenuates Antitumor Immune Activity of T Cells via Regulation of PD-1 mRNA
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Immunology Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Immunology Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Tumor Cell–Derived TGFβ1 Attenuates Antitumor Immune Activity of T Cells via Regulation of PD-1 mRNA
Pengfei Wu, Bo Geng, Qun Chen, Enyang Zhao, Jiang Liu, Chen Sun, Caijun Zha, Yong Shao, Bosen You, Wenfu Zhang, Lulu Li, Xiangqi Meng, Jinquan Cai and Xuedong Li
Cancer Immunol Res December 1 2020 (8) (12) 1470-1484; DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-20-0113

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Tumor Cell–Derived TGFβ1 Attenuates Antitumor Immune Activity of T Cells via Regulation of PD-1 mRNA
Pengfei Wu, Bo Geng, Qun Chen, Enyang Zhao, Jiang Liu, Chen Sun, Caijun Zha, Yong Shao, Bosen You, Wenfu Zhang, Lulu Li, Xiangqi Meng, Jinquan Cai and Xuedong Li
Cancer Immunol Res December 1 2020 (8) (12) 1470-1484; DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-20-0113
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Notch-Regulated DCs Limit Inflammation and Carcinogenesis
  • ONCR-177 Activates Systemic Antitumor Immunity
  • TGF Influences Alternative Splicing of Irf1 in Th1 Cells
Show more Research Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Cancer Immunology Essentials

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Immunology Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Immunology Research
eISSN: 2326-6074
ISSN: 2326-6066

Advertisement