Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Cancer Immunology Essentials
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • "Best of" Collection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Immunology Research
Cancer Immunology Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Cancer Immunology Essentials
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • "Best of" Collection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Research Articles

Phase I Trial of Autologous CAR T Cells Targeting NKG2D Ligands in Patients with AML/MDS and Multiple Myeloma

Susanne H. Baumeister, Joana Murad, Lillian Werner, Heather Daley, Helene Trebeden-Negre, Joanina K. Gicobi, Adam Schmucker, Jake Reder, Charles L. Sentman, David E. Gilham, Frédéric F. Lehmann, Ilene Galinsky, Heidi DiPietro, Kristen Cummings, Nikhil C. Munshi, Richard M. Stone, Donna S. Neuberg, Robert Soiffer, Glenn Dranoff, Jerome Ritz and Sarah Nikiforow
Susanne H. Baumeister
1Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
2Division of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
3Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
4Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Susanne H. Baumeister
Joana Murad
5Celdara Medical, LLC, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lillian Werner
1Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Heather Daley
1Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helene Trebeden-Negre
1Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joanina K. Gicobi
1Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adam Schmucker
5Celdara Medical, LLC, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jake Reder
5Celdara Medical, LLC, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jake Reder
Charles L. Sentman
6Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David E. Gilham
7Celyad, SA, Mont-Saint-Guibert, Belgium.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frédéric F. Lehmann
7Celyad, SA, Mont-Saint-Guibert, Belgium.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ilene Galinsky
1Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Heidi DiPietro
1Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kristen Cummings
1Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nikhil C. Munshi
1Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
4Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard M. Stone
1Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
4Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Donna S. Neuberg
1Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Donna S. Neuberg
Robert Soiffer
1Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
4Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Glenn Dranoff
8Novartis BioMedical Institutes, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jerome Ritz
1Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
4Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jerome Ritz
Sarah Nikiforow
1Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
4Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sarah_nikiforow@dfci.harvard.edu
DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0307 Published January 2019
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

NKG2D ligands are widely expressed in solid and hematologic malignancies but absent or poorly expressed on healthy tissues. We conducted a phase I dose-escalation study to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a single infusion of NKG2D-chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, without lymphodepleting conditioning in subjects with acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Autologous T cells were transfected with a γ-retroviral vector encoding a CAR fusing human NKG2D with the CD3ζ signaling domain. Four dose levels (1 × 106–3 × 107 total viable T cells) were evaluated. Twelve subjects were infused [7 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and 5 multiple myeloma]. NKG2D-CAR products demonstrated a median 75% vector-driven NKG2D expression on CD3+ T cells. No dose-limiting toxicities, cytokine release syndrome, or CAR T cell–related neurotoxicity was observed. No significant autoimmune reactions were noted, and none of the ≥ grade 3 adverse events were attributable to NKG2D-CAR T cells. At the single injection of low cell doses used in this trial, no objective tumor responses were observed. However, hematologic parameters transiently improved in one subject with AML at the highest dose, and cases of disease stability without further therapy or on subsequent treatments were noted. At 24 hours, the cytokine RANTES increased a median of 1.9-fold among all subjects and 5.8-fold among six AML patients. Consistent with preclinical studies, NKG2D-CAR T cell–expansion and persistence were limited. Manufactured NKG2D-CAR T cells exhibited functional activity against autologous tumor cells in vitro, but modifications to enhance CAR T-cell expansion and target density may be needed to boost clinical activity.

Introduction

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy can induce remarkable clinical remissions in refractory B-cell lineage leukemias and lymphomas (1–6). However, clinical success targeting non–B-cell antigens has been limited, and novel strategies to target acute myeloid leukemia (AML), multiple myeloma (MM), and solid tumors are needed. Here, we report results from a first-in-human phase I trial using CAR-expressing autologous T cells targeted against NKG2D ligands in adult patients with AML/myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and relapsed/refractory myeloma. Both the CAR structure and nature of the targeted antigens were distinct from CAR approaches in previous clinical trials. Rather than incorporating single-chain fragment immunoglobulin variable regions, this CAR used the naturally occurring NKG2D receptor as the antigen-binding domain, fused to the intracellular domain of CD3ζ. A γ-retroviral vector was used to express the NKG2D-CAR, relying on endogenous Dap10 expression and colocalization to provide a costimulatory signal (7). NKG2D is an activating receptor expressed on NK cells, invariant NKT cells, γδ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and a small fraction of CD4+ T cells. NKG2D forms a homodimer and associates with the adaptor molecule Dap10 in the transmembrane domain to form a hexameric complex that mediates its function in T cells via recruitment of the p85 PI3-kinase and Vav-1 signaling complex (8). In its native form, NKG2D provides a costimulatory signal to T cells but relies on antigen recognition via the T-cell receptor (TCR) to deliver the primary activating signal (7). In contrast, NKG2D ligand recognition through the NKG2D-CAR mediates primary T-cell activation.

NKG2D is highly conserved and recognizes a group of eight ligands, namely, MICA, MICB, and the UL16-binding proteins (ULBP) 1–6. NKG2D ligands are upregulated in response to DNA damage, infection with certain pathogens, and importantly, malignant transformation (7). NKG2D ligand expression has been reported in a broad range of solid tumors and hematologic malignancies, including AML and MM, whereas ligands are generally absent on healthy tissues (9–14). Thus, NKG2D-based CAR T cells have the potential for broad oncologic applications. Murine studies by Sentman and colleagues demonstrate NKG2D-CAR T-cell efficacy in eradicating established MM, lymphoma, and ovarian cancers and the induction of autologous immunity protective against tumor rechallenge, even after NKG2D-CAR T cells were no longer detectable (15–21). NKG2D-CAR T cells have also been shown to inhibit the growth of tumors with heterogeneous NKG2D ligand expression (22). Importantly, human NKG2D-CAR T cells do not react to autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) or bone marrow (BM) from healthy donors in vitro (16). Nevertheless, concern for ligand upregulation on healthy tissues and induction of an inflammatory feedback loop under conditions of cell stress is justified. Analogous to cytokine release syndrome (CRS), which has been observed in CAR T-cell clinical trials, dose- and strain-dependent NKG2D-CAR toxicity was associated with production of inflammatory cytokines in murine models (23, 24). Therefore, this trial was designed emphasizing safety parameters. Lymphodepleting chemotherapy, which was not required for efficacy in murine models, was not used to minimize the risk of NKG2D ligand induction on healthy tissues. Dose-escalation started at a single low dose of 1 × 106 viable T cells. In this first-in-human trial, we demonstrated the feasibility and safety of infusion of freshly manufactured autologous NKG2D-CAR T cells in AML and MM patients up to a dose of 3 × 107 T cells. Observations of transient hematologic improvement and unexpected disease stability in some patients, as well as demonstration of CAR T-cell activity against autologous tumor cells in vitro, support further development of this approach.

Materials and Methods

Study design and participants

This single-center phase I study was conducted as per the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines and approved by the FDA, the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee and the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center institutional review board, #NCT02203825 (www.clinicaltrials.gov). All patients provided written informed consent. Eligible subjects were ≥18 years old with AML or MDS, not in remission and without standard treatment options, or relapsed/refractory MM with measurable and progressive disease after prior therapy with an immunomodulator and proteasome inhibitor. Notable exclusion criteria included central nervous system involvement, active infections, uncontrolled medical disorders, active autoimmune disease, prior disease-directed therapy within 3 weeks of T-cell infusion, and prior allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT), gene therapy, or adoptive T-cell therapy. Infusion criteria included absence of fever, active infection, and rapid disease progression. Products were infused in patients after administration of acetaminophen 650 mg by mouth and diphenhydramine 25 to 50 mg by mouth or intravenously. A modified Fibonacci “3 + 3” dose-escalation design of a single infusion of NKG2D-CAR T cells ranging from 1 × 106 to 3 × 107 total viable CD3+ T cells across 4 dose levels was followed, with the provision to enroll at least 1 patient with AML/MDS and MM in each 3-patient cohort.

The primary endpoints included evaluating the safety and feasibility of a single intravenous infusion of freshly manufactured NKG2D-CAR T cells without lymphodepleting conditioning. Feasibility was defined by the frequency of enrolled subjects who did receive NKG2D-CAR T cells. Safety was defined by the absence of NCI CTCAE v4.0 ≥ grade 3 events or grade 2 autoimmune events with possible, probable, or definite attribution to NKG2D-CAR T cells. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, clinical antitumor effects, and immunologic correlatives. Objective tumor response rates were monitored according to the Myeloma IMWG Uniform Response Criteria, MDS IWG Response Criteria, and revised “Cheson” criteria for AML, respectively, with the initial response assessment at day 28 (25–28). Stable disease was not an endpoint defined for subjects with AML in the original trial design (29). To obtain samples for safety, efficacy, and immunologic analyses, patients underwent collection of plasma and peripheral blood samples at prospectively defined time points such as preinfusion, 1 and 24 hours following infusion, weekly until 28 days following infusion then monthly as relevant, as well as BM sampling and repeat imaging preinfusion, at 28 days, and 3 months as relevant.

Clinical γ-retroviral vector and cell product manufacture and analysis

Construct design.

The NKG2D-CAR gene (chNKG2D) was created by fusing the human cytoplasmic CD3ζ coding sequence to the full-length human NKG2D gene (KLRK1; ref. 30; Fig. 1A). Sequence of NKG2D CAR transgene: (CD3ζ cytoplasmic domain underscored; NKG2D gene bold).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

NKG2D-CAR concept and trial design. A, Full-length NKG2D with preserved extracellular (EC), transmembrane (TM), and cytoplasmic domain (CYTO) were fused to the cytoplasmic domain of the CD3ζ chain to create the NKG2D-CAR and cloned into the SFG vector. B, In T cells, recognition of NKG2D ligands by native NKG2D provides costimulation via Dap10 signaling but relies on primary T-cell activation through the TCR. In NKG2D-CAR T cells, the CAR directly activates NKG2D-CAR T cells through binding of MICA, MICB, or the UL-16 binding proteins (ULBP) 1–6 on tumor cells, independent of the TCR, and receives a costimulatory signal through the preserved transmembrane interaction with Dap10. C, Trial schema indicates a 3-week washout period from prior therapy, 9-day manufacturing process, infusion of freshly manufactured T cells according to dose level, DLT evaluation at 21 days, and response evaluation at 28 days after infusion.

ATGAGAGTGAAGTTCAGCAGGAGCGCAGACGCCCCCGCGTACCAGCAGGGCCAGAACCAGCTCTATAACGAGCTCAATCTAGGACGAAGAGAGGAGTACGATGTTTTGGACAAGAGACGTGGCCGGGACCCTGAGATGGGGGGAAAGCCGCAGAGAAGGAAGAACCCTCAGGAAGGCCTGTACAATGAACTGCAGAAAGATAAGATGGCGGAGGCCTACAGTGAGATTGGGATGAAAGGCGAGCGCCGGAGGGGCAAGGGGCACGATGGCCTTTACCAGGGTCTCAGTACAGCCACCAAGGACACCTACGACGCCCTTCACATGCAGGCCCTGCCCCCTCGCGAATTCGGGTGGATTCGTGGTCGGAGGTCTCGACACAGCTGGGAGATGAGTGAATTTCATAATTATAACTTGGATCTGAAGAAGAGTGATTTTTCAACACGATGGCAAAAGCAAAGATGTCCAGTAGTCAAAAGCAAATGTAGAGAAAATGCATCTCCATTTTTTTTCTGCTGCTTCATCGCTGTAGCCATGGGAATCCGTTTCATTATTATGGTAGCAATATGGAGTGCTGTATTCCTAAACTCATTATTCAACCAAGAAGTTCAAATTCCCTTGACCGAAAGTTACTGTGGCCCATGTCCTAAAAACTGGATATGTTACAAAAATAACTGCTACCAATTTTTTGATGAGAGTAAAAACTGGTATGAGAGCCAGGCTTCTTGTATGTCTCAAAATGCCAGCCTTCTGAAAGTATACAGCAAAGAGGACCAGGATTTACTTAAACTGGTGAAGTCATATCATTGGATGGGACTAGTACACATTCCAACAAATGGATCTTGGCAGTGGGAAGATGGCTCCATTCTCTCACCCAACCTACTAACAATAATTGAAATGCAGAAGGGAGACTGTGCACTCTATGCATCGAGCTTTAAAGGCTATATAGAAAACTGTTCAACTCCAAATACATACATCTGCATGCAAAGGACTGTGTAA.

NKG2D is a type II protein in which the NH2 terminal is located intracellularly, whereas CD3ζ is a type I protein with the COOH terminal in the cytoplasm. Therefore, the CD3ζ cytoplasmic domain, containing its three ITAMs, was fused to NKG2D in reverse orientation (COOH terminal of CD3ζ to NH2-terminal of NKG2D), as described (20), and then cloned into the Moloney murine leukemia virus-based γ-retroviral vector SFG, received from the laboratory of Dr. Gianpietro Dotti (Baylor College of Medicine) with the permission of Dr. Richard Mulligan (Harvard Medical School; ref. 31). Upon expression, the orientation of the CD3ζ chain was in an inverted orientation as part of the CAR. No signal peptide was required for CAR expression, given that NKG2D is a type II protein.

By using full-length NKG2D, colocalization with endogenously expressed Dap10 in the transmembrane domain provides a costimulatory signal. Untransduced CD8+ T cells may receive a costimulatory signal via native NKG2D, but they require a primary activating signal through their TCR. In NKG2D-CAR–expressing T cells, recognition of NKG2D ligands via the CAR mediates primary T-cell activation, independent of the endogenous TCR and provides a costimulatory signal via endogenously expressed Dap10 (Fig. 1B).

Cells and cell lines.

PG13 producer lines were generated under cGMP conditions by repeated transduction with transient retroviral supernatant obtained from a Phoenix-Eco packaging cell line transfected with SFG-chNKG2D vector. Clinical-grade high-titer viral supernatant was produced from a PG13 SFG-chNKG2D clone at Rimedion (Indiana University), per cGMP procedures. RPMI 8866 (95041316) and K562 (CRL-3344) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and P815 (TIB-64) from ATCC prior to the performance of the experiments. Cells lines were passaged at the recommended ratios and used between the passages of 3 and 30. Cultures were regularly checked for mycoplasma contamination by qPCR using MycoSeq (Thermo Fisher).

Manufacturing process.

Autologous PBMCs were obtained by peripheral venipuncture (∼120 mL) or nonmobilized apheresis guided by an absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) threshold of 0.6K cells/μL, followed by Ficoll-isolation (GE Healthcare). Cell manufacturing occurred over 9 days in the Dana-Farber Cell Manipulation Core Facility under cGMP conditions (Fig. 1C). Fresh PBMCs were seeded at 1 × 106 cells/mL with interleukin 2 (IL2; 100 IU/mL; Proleukin, Bayer HealthCare) and OKT3 (40 ng/mL; MACS GMP CD3 pure, Miltenyi Biotec) for 48 hours in X-Vivo 15 medium (Lonza) supplemented with 5% human AB serum (Gemini Bio-products) and 2 mmol/L L-glutamine (Lonza) in T75 cm2 cell culture flasks (Nunc). Activated cells were then transduced twice with clinical-grade SFG-chNKG2D retrovirus supernatant in retronectin-coated [Retronectin (GMP), Takara BIO Inc.] 24-well plates (Cellstar Greiner Bio-one) in the presence of IL2 (100 IU/mL) on days –6 and –5. Eighteen to 24 hours after the last transduction, cells were transferred into G-Rex flasks (Wilson Wolf) in complete X-Vivo 15 supplemented with IL2 (100 IU/mL). Cells were fed with additional fresh complete X-Vivo 15 with IL2 (100 IU/mL) on day –2, and transduced T cells were harvested after approximately 48 additional hours of culture. Cells were resuspended in Plasmalyte (Baxter) supplemented with 1% human Albumin (Grifols), counted using trypan blue, and infused fresh. Release criteria included ≥70% viability, ≥5% CD8+ T-cell transduction efficiency, negative testing for endotoxin (<5 EU/kg/hour), negative gram stain (analyzed on day of release), and ≤5 vector copy number (VCN)/cell and negative PCR testing for mycoplasma (a sample of cells was obtained on day –1 prior to harvest for analysis and analyzed by qPCR using MycoSEQ (Thermo Fisher). The manufacturing process is comprehensively detailed separately (32).

Flow cytometry of manufactured products.

Products were characterized using standard flow cytometry techniques to determine surface expression of T-, B-, NK, myeloid, and plasma cell and T-cell differentiation markers with 4 panels including combinations of the following fluorophore-conjugated anti-human monoclonal antibodies (mAb; Supplementary Table S1): (i) NKG2D expression: CD3, CD4, CD8, CD314 (NKG2D); (ii) myeloid cells: CD34, CD14, CD33, CD11b; (iii) T-, B-, and NK cells: CD45, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19, CD16, CD56; (iv) plasma cells: CD38, CD138, CD3, CD19. Cells were acquired on a BD FACSCanto flow cytometer and analyzed using BD FACSDiva Version 6.1.3 (BD Biosciences). Native NKG2D has high expression and is indistinguishable by surface staining from NKG2D-CAR expression on CD8+ T cells (7). We, therefore, established a threshold of NKG2D surface fluorescence intensity, exceeded by only 5% of CD8+ T cells in a mock-treated autologous T-cell culture and measured transduction efficiency based on the percentage of CD8+ T cells exceeding this threshold for each patient. Transduction efficiency in CD4+ T cells was measured relative to isotype controls (Supplementary Fig. S1). Aliquots of end-of-manufacturing samples were cryopreserved and subsequently stained with the following anti-human mAbs to determine the T-cell differentiation state of the infused product using standard staining techniques: CD45RO, CD3, CD4, CD8, CCR7, CD314, acquired on a BD FACSCanto flow cytometer and analyzed using FACSDiva Version 8.0.1 (BD Biosciences).

Standard extracellular protein staining techniques.

Staining on NKG2D-CART cell products was performed directly after harvest from culture for release testing and on thawed, cryopreserved product for T-cell differentiation markers. For staining of patient samples, whole blood was incubated in RBC lysis buffer (eBioscience). All cells were then washed twice in PBS ± 2% FCS, and patient samples and fresh final product incubated with Fc receptor block (Miltenyi) at 4°C prior to staining. After incubation with relevant monoclonal antibodies (Supplementary Table S1) at 4°C, cells were washed with PBS ± 2% FCS and, if relevant, were fixed using Cytofix (BD) prior to analysis.

VCN and replication competent retrovirus (RCR) testing.

To determine VCN, the retroviral DNA sequence was monitored by qPCR in samples of total DNA using primers and a labeled probe (Integrated DNA Technologies) specific for the fusion region of the NKG2D CAR construct. One million cells were processed for DNA extraction using Blood and Cell Culture DNA kit (Qiagen) and 100 ng of DNA was used in each reaction, using SsoAdvanced Universal Probes Supermix (Bio-Rad) on a StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) with rapid temperature ramp speed in a validated assay. The primer and probe sequences were as follows: forward primer (5′-GCCACCAAGGACACCTAC-3′), reverse primer (5′-CTCATCTCCCAGCTGTGTC-3′), probe (5′-[FAM]-AATTCGGGTGGATTCGTGGTCGG-[BHQ]-3′). The probe was labeled at the 5′ end, as indicated, with 6-FAM, and 3′ Black Hole Quencher (IDT).

To determine copy number per unit DNA, a 7-point standard curve was generated consisting of 10–1 × 106 copies of SFG.NKG2D-CAR plasmid DNA spiked into 100 ng nontransduced genomic DNA. Each data point (sample, standard curve) was obtained in quadruplicate. Pass/fail parameters were based on prestablished acceptance ranges for assay performance derived from qualification studies and included r2 values, amplification efficiency, absence of potential amplification in healthy donor DNA, and ability to accurately quantify known amounts of plasmid DNA spiked into genomic DNA within a predefined result range. The following formula was used to control for outlier CT values among quadruplicates: Embedded Image Data points with a Z value > 1.1 were discarded (33). The lower limit of quantification for the assay was 30 copies/100 ng DNA. Copy number per cell was determined based on the following formula: average VCN/cell = (copies/ng DNA in the reaction) × (total ng DNA/cell number).

For RCR testing, DNA was isolated from the 1 × 106 NKG2D CAR product T cells, as well as 15 mL of T-cell supernatant from CAR T-cell product cultures at day –1 as described above. Primers (IDT) used were GALV5’II: 5′-ACCACAGGCGACAGACTTTTT-3′ and GALV3’II: 5′-TGAGACAGCCTCTCTTTTAGTCCT-3′. PCR-certified water and PG13 DNA were used as negative and positive controls (500 bp for the GALV gene amplification), respectively, and cells and cell supernatant from NKG2D CAR T-cell cultures were evaluated for the presence of this gene. PCR reactions were run under the following conditions: 95°C denaturation, 65°C annealing, and 72°C extension for a total of 35 cycles. Amplified samples were analyzed on a 1% agarose gel in 1XTAE SyberSafe (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and visualized under UV light. Samples were then evaluated for the presence or absence of a 500-bp band, characteristic of GALV protein (34).

NKG2D-CAR T-cell function by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Concurrent with NKG2D-CAR product release and infusion, in vitro functional activity was assessed by coculture of 100,000 clinical-grade NKG2D-CAR T cells with 100,000 autologous patient PBMCs or BM cells (cryopreserved prior to infusion and involved by underlying AML or MM) or with healthy donor PBMCs, RPMI 8866, K562, or P815 cells at a 1:1 ratio for 24 hours. Cells were cultured in complete X-Vivo media (Lonza) in 96-well round bottom plates (Corning). NKG2D-CAR T cells or mock-treated T cells were incubated with purified anti-human CD314 (NKG2D, 20 μg/mL, clone 1D11; BD) or isotype antibody (20 μg/mL) for 15 minutes prior to coculture. Cell-free media were harvested and concentrations of IFNγ determined by ELISA (IFNγ Duoset ELISA, R&D Systems).

Analysis of patient samples following NKG2D-CAR T-cell infusion

NKG2D CAR transgene and RCR detection by PCR.

To quantify NKG2D-CAR transgenes and RCR present in peripheral blood (PB) and/or BM, genomic DNA was extracted from cryopreserved PB or BM aspirate samples using QIAamp DNA blood extraction kits (Qiagen), quantified by spectrophotometer, and stored at –80C. qPCR analysis on genomic DNA samples and data analysis was performed as described for VCN and RCR detection on the NKG2D-CAR product, with the sets of primers and probe used for each assay detailed below.

NKG2D CAR transgene detection: Forward primer (5′-GCCACCAAGGACACCTAC-3′), reverse primer (5′-CTCATCTCCCAGCTGTGTC-3′), probe (5′-[FAM]-AATTCGGGTGGATTCGTGGTCGG-[BHQ]-3′). Probe was labeled at the 5′ end, as indicated, with 6-FAM, and 3′ Black Hole Quencher (IDT).

RCR detection: Forward primer (5′-TCCGGAGACCATCAGTATCT-3′), reverse primer (5′-GGATAGTAATAGATGCGAGGAATCA-3′), probe (5′-[FAM]-CCCTTGCCTCTCCACCTCAGTTT-[BHQ]-3′). Probe was labeled at the 5′ end, as indicated, with 6-FAM, and 3′ Black Hole Quencher (IDT).

Circulating NKG2D-CAR T cells and NKG2D ligand expression by flow cytometry.

Standard whole blood flow cytometry techniques with combinations of the following anti-human mAbs were used to monitor kinetics of NKG2D-CAR T cells in PB and BM, and NKG2D ligand expression on tumor cells: NKG2D, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD117, CD123, CD34, CD138, CD38, CD45, HLA-DR, CD33, MICA, MICB, ULBP1, ULBP2/5/6, ULBP3, and ULBP4 (Supplementary Table S1). Cells were acquired on an LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences), and analysis performed using FlowJo software V10 (Treestar). Specific fluorescence indices (SFI) were calculated by dividing the median fluorescence intensity obtained with specific monoclonal antibodies by that of isotype controls.

ELISAs for soluble MICA and MICB.

Soluble MICA and MICB in cell-free patient plasma were measured by ELISA using human MICA and MICB ELISA kits as per the manufacturer's instructions (Thermo Scientific).

Analysis of cytokine secretion.

To evaluate cytokines, 20 μL of patient plasma was diluted 1:1 with assay buffer and processed according to the manufacturer's instructions for the MILLIPEX MAP Human Cytokine/Chemokine Bead Panel (Millipore) at baseline and several time points after infusion for the following 41 cytokines: sCD40L, EGF, Eotaxin/CCL11, FGF-2, Flt-3 ligand, Fractalkine, G-CSF, GM-CSF, GRO, IFNα2, IFNγ, IL1α, IL1β, IL1ra, IL2, IL3, IL4, IL5, IL6, IL7, IL8, IL9, IL10, IL12 (p40), IL12 (p70), IL13, IL15, IL17A, IP-10, MCP-1, MCP-3, MDC (CCL22), MIP-1α, MIP-1β, PDGF-AA, PDGF-AB/BB, RANTES, TGFα, TNFα, TNFβ, and VEGF. Samples were run on the Bio-Plex 200 Suspension Array System (Bio-Rad). Standard curves were generated using human cytokine standards provided by the manufacturer (Millipore). Bio-Plex Manager V6.0 was used to analyze the data (Bio-Rad).

Statistical analysis

The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as the highest T-cell dose at which ≤1 of 6 patients developed a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). DLTs were defined as ≥grade 3 toxicities not directly attributable to underlying disease or ≥grade 2 autoimmune toxicity per NCI CTCAE v4.0, occurring within 21 days, at least possibly related to T-cell infusion and not controllable to ≤grade 1 within 72 hours. Patient and clinical characteristics were summarized as median and range for continuous variables and numbers and percentages for categorical variables. All reported toxicities, regardless of attribution, were summarized by type, maximum grade, and sorted by number of patients experiencing the toxicity. The maximum grade consolidates reports of a given toxicity for each patient over time. Overall survival (OS) was defined from the time of infusion to death or censored at the last known alive date. Spearman correction coefficient was used to summarize the correlation between ALC at time of infusion and maximum detected transgene level. Two-sample t tests were used to compare IFNγ production under specific conditions with nominal P values reported; P < 0.05 was considered significant. Analyses were performed using SAS Version 9.4 (SAS Institute).

Results

Patient characteristics

Fourteen patients consented. One patient died prior to initiating screening, and one enrolled patient became ineligible due to rapid disease progression prior to cell collection. Twelve patients had autologous T cells collected, received NKG2D-CAR T cells, and were evaluable. Median age was 70 years (range, 44–79 years), and 7 subjects had AML and 5 had MM. The median percentage of BM blasts on core biopsy in subjects with AML was 50% (range, 15%–60%), with a median of 1 prior therapy (range, 0–4). Four AML patients had disease secondary to MDS, 3 had complex cytogenetics, 3 had TP53 mutations, 2 had FLT3 mutations (1 ITD, 1 TKD). All myeloma patients had undergone ≥5 therapies, including ≥1 autologous SCT. Three subjects had plasmacytomas with little marrow involvement. Median serum M-spike was 1.75 g/dL (range, 0–3.16 g/dL), and median urine M-spike was 256 mg/24 hours (range, 0–3,969 mg/24 hours; Table 1; Supplementary Table S2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Patient characteristics

Feasibility of manufacturing

Autologous PBMCs were obtained via peripheral venipuncture (n = 5) or nonmobilized apheresis (n = 7). All patients who underwent collection had CAR T-cell products successfully manufactured from initial fresh PBMCs and received NKG2D-CAR T cells at the protocol-specified doses. The CD4+/CD8+ composition was variable, with a median CD8+ T cells of 36% (range, 7–89%). Products were predominantly comprised of CD45RO+CCR7– T-effector memory (Tem) and CD45RO+CCR7+ central memory (Tcm) cells, with a median CD8+ Tem of 51% (range, 39–73%) and CD8+ Tcm of 36% (range 4–59%). The median VCN of the NKG2D-CAR transgene in the infused product was 0.61 copies/cell (range, 0.37–1.86), and the median transduction efficiency was 66% (range, 15%–87%) on CD8+ T cells and 92% (range, 74%–98%) on CD4+ T cells. Median NKG2D-CAR expression in the entire CD3+ compartment was 75% (range, 55%–90%), resulting in median transduced T-cell doses of 7.38 × 105, 2.15 × 106, 6.92 × 106, and 2.45 × 107 in the respective dose cohorts (Table 2). AML blasts and CD38+CD138+ plasma cells were efficiently eliminated during the manufacturing process (median, ≤0.1% of live cells). In a single instance, CD19+ B cells persisted in both mock and transduced cultures (16% of live cells), expressed NKG2D after transduction, and were included in the infused product. This did not result in any clinical toxicities; workup, including an extensive leukemia/lymphoma flow panel, and viral testing was negative. Of the 12 patients, 11 received fresh NKG2D-CAR product immediately after harvest from manufacturing. For 1 patient, the product was stored at 4°C until resolution of respiratory symptoms, subsequently met viability criteria (≥70%), and was administered within 48 hours.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Cell product characteristics

Safety and clinical outcomes

Products were infused inpatient after administration of acetaminophen and diphenhydramine without prior lymphodepletion. No infusional toxicity, CRS, severe autoimmunity (specifically, no colitis or pneumonitis), CAR T cell–related encephalopathy syndrome (CRES), or death was observed. One hundred twenty adverse events (AE) were reported: 18 (15%) grade 3 and 8 (7%) grade 4 (Supplementary Table S3). Of the grade ≥3 AEs, none were attributed to the NKG2D-CAR T cells but, rather, to underlying disease progression or infection. No DLTs were observed. Patient 8 (MM) had cryoglobulinemia preceding CAR T-cell infusion and experienced complications of hyperviscosity syndrome with acute hearing loss and bilateral intracochlear bleeds, despite plasmapheresis (35, 36). Events related to progressive plasmacytomas included cord compression, biliary obstruction and gastric erosion, and bleeding. None of the observed cases of parainfluenza (day 19, patient 1, AML), influenza A (day 24, patient 6, MM), and gram-negative biliary sepsis (day 29, patient 3, MM with prior peripancreatic plasmacytomas) prompted significant inflammatory or autoimmune symptoms besides fever. Patient 4 (MM) experienced new upper respiratory symptoms on the day of planned infusion. Out of concern for NKG2D ligand upregulation in bronchial epithelial cells under oxidative stress (37), cell infusion was delayed within a predefined 48-hour window until symptoms had resolved and a negative infectious workup was confirmed. No subsequent respiratory complications occurred. Two patients, at dose level 4, developed a self-limited grade 1 follicular erythematous rash between 1 and 3 months after NKG2D CAR T-cell infusion. In patient 12 (AML), this was deemed probably related to NKG2D-CAR T cells given concurrent improvements in hematologic parameters. PB NKG2D-CAR transgene levels at that time were detectable at low levels. Skin biopsy revealed nonspecific, mild spongiotic and interface dermatitis, with a very mild lymphocytic infiltrate. The rash resolved without systemic or topical steroids before additional skin sampling for qPCR detection of NKG2D-CAR sequences could be obtained, and the NKG2D-CAR transgene became undetectable in the PB thereafter.

Objective clinical responses to NKG2D-CAR T-cell therapy alone, defined in the study protocol, were not seen, and all subjects received subsequent therapy (Fig. 2A). Three subjects (2 MM and 1 AML) started within 28 days of NKG2D-CAR T-cell infusion. Median OS was 4.7 months (range, 1.2–24.9+ months), with survival rates of 75% and 42% at 3 and 6 months, respectively. Two subjects remained alive at 16.8 months and 24.9 months, respectively. Patients 3, 4, and 8 (MM) exhibited disease stability for over 1 year on alternative therapies. Likewise, patient 5 (AML), maintained stable disease for 6 months on an IDH-1 inhibitor trial despite a mutated allele frequency of <5% IDH and 54% p53 mutation burden at CAR T-cell infusion. Patient 7 (AML, dose level 3), with 50% BM blasts and a p53 mutation with allele burden of 80% at infusion, experienced resolution of B-symptoms, transient decrease in transfusion requirements, and had a 4.4-month survival without further therapy (Fig. 2A). Lastly, patient 12 (AML, dose level 4) experienced improvement in hematologic parameters without further interventions (Fig. 2B), concurrent with development of a grade 1 skin rash and met the definition of “stable disease” at 3 months as defined by recent AML guidelines (29). He remained clinically stable for 6 months without further therapy and was alive at last follow-up on alternative treatment.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Patient outcomes. A, Swimmer's plot indicating survival and time of subsequent therapies. B, Trajectory of PB counts in patient 12 (AML) after NKG2D-CAR T-cell infusion.

Analysis of patient T-cell phenotypes, cytokines, and tumor ligand expression following infusion

NKG2D-CAR T cells were transiently detected in 4 patients by qPCR in PB (AML, dose levels 1 and 4; MM, dose levels 1 and 2; Fig. 3A), whereas analysis of BM at day 28 was negative for the NKG2D-CAR transgene in all evaluable patients (n = 9). The highest transgene level was observed in patient 3 (MM, dose level 1), with the lowest ALC at infusion (0.08K cells/μL) (Fig. 3B), and a trend toward an inverse correlation between ALC and transgene detection was noted (correlation efficient –0.54, P = 0.07). Surface immunophenotyping of circulating lymphocyte subsets revealed no significant NKG2D-CAR T-cell expansion, measured by percentage of NKG2D+ cells among CD4+ T cells or absolute numbers of NKG2D+CD8+ or NKG2D+CD4+ T cells (Fig. 3C), but was limited by lack of a CAR-specific surface marker.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Detection and bioactivity of NKG2D-CAR T cells in PB. A, NKG2D-CAR DNA at time points indicated on the horizontal axis as measured by qPCR. B, ALCs at time of infusion. Color scheme for patients is identical in A and B. C, Monitoring of absolute numbers of NKG2D+ CD8+ and CD4+ T cells using flow cytometry (n = 12, mean ± SEM). D, RANTES detected (n = 11, mean ± SEM).

Plasma cytokines were monitored by Luminex. Except for 1 AML patient with undetectable RANTES concentrations (patient 09, dose level 3), all evaluated patients (n = 11) demonstrated an increase in RANTES within 3 weeks of NKG2D-CAR T-cell infusion (Fig. 3D). At 24 hours, the median fold-increase was 1.8 (range, 0–865) among all patients, with a median fold-increase of 5.8 (range, 1.64–865) among the 6 AML patients with detectable concentrations.

NKG2D ligand expression on patient AML blasts or MM plasma cells derived from pretreatment BM samples was evaluated by flow cytometry. Although ligand expression was relatively low, all 10 evaluable patients demonstrated an SFI >1.0 for at least one ligand. Consistent with other studies (14), coexpression of multiple ligands was observed (Fig. 4A). Soluble MICA in plasma was detected in 10 and MICB in 4 of 11 assayed patients prior to NKG2D-CAR T-cell infusion (Fig. 4B).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

NKG2D-ligand expression and soluble ligands. A, Surface NKG2D ligand detection in AML blasts (7 AML patients) and MM cells (3 MM patients) in bone marrow aspirates (BMA) at baseline measured by flow cytometry (SFI>1 indicates ligand expression exceeding isotype). AML blasts: live/CD45dim cells expressing patient-specific AML markers including CD117, CD123, CD33, and HLA-DR. MM cells: live/CD138+CD38+ cells. B, Detection of soluble MICA and MICB in patient plasma at baseline using ELISA. Plasma of patient 3 (MM) was separately spiked with soluble MICA and MICB as an internal positive control. ND: not detectable.

NKG2D-CAR T cells from all tested products (n = 11) produced IFNγ during coculture with NKG2D ligand–expressing cell lines RPMI8886 and K562, but not the ligand-negative line P815. In select patients, paired samples were available to assess in vitro function of NKG2D-CAR T-cell products against autologous tumor (n = 4). Coculture resulted in significant IFNγ production by NKG2D-CAR T cells in response to autologous tumor-containing PBMCs or BM but not to ligand-negative cell lines or healthy donor PBMCs. This effect was NKG2D-specific, as it was abrogated by preincubation of CAR T cells with an NKG2D-blocking mAb but not isotype control (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Functional activity of NKG2D-CAR T cells against autologous tumor. NKG2D-CAR T cells or mock-treated autologous T cells were cultured at a 1:1 ratio with autologous patient PBMCs containing AML blasts, patient BM aspirate involved by MM, ligand-negative cell lines (P815), or healthy allogeneic donor PBMCs. IFNγ in the supernatants was measured by ELISA (**, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001; ****, P ≤ 0.0001). T cells were incubated with an NKG2D-blocking monoclonal antibody or isotype control antibody prior to addition of target cells as indicated.

Discussion

Given the potential to target any of the eight NKG2D ligands found in various hematologic and solid malignancies, the efficacy in murine models (16–19, 22), and the feasibility of manufacturing in preclinical studies, we embarked on this first-in-human trial to assess the safety and feasibility of NKG2D-CAR T cells in subjects with AML/MDS and MM. We demonstrated safety without identifying an MTD at cell doses ranging 1 × 106 to 3 × 107, when administered as a single infusion without prior lymphodepleting therapy and showed feasibility of manufacturing and administration without cryopreservation. We did not observe a robust efficacy signal in this initial phase I study. However, the NKG2D-CAR approach is still in early stages of clinical development and has several unique features and strengths: unlike antigens, which are lineage-restricted to a subset of cancers, NKG2D ligands are surface-expressed in more than 15 different malignancies, including colon, breast, and lung cancers, AML, MM, Ewing sarcoma, and neuroblastoma (11). Thus, if clinical efficacy can be achieved with a reasonable safety profile, NKG2D-CAR therapy would have an impact across many malignancies with significant medical need. Reactivity against eight, often concurrently expressed, ligands might counteract tumor evasion via clonal selection, mutations, and alternative splicing (38).

Given minimal surface expression of NKG2D ligands in normal tissues, long-term toxicities, such as B-cell aplasia (39) or myeloablation, seen with other CAR strategies targeting AML are not expected (40), and no grade ≥3 toxicities or autoimmune events related to NKG2D-CAR therapy were observed in this study. However, the inducible nature of NKG2D ligands raises concern for potential “on-target, off-tumor” toxicity and a positive feedback loop mediated by NKG2D-CAR T cells in the setting of systemic inflammation. Toxicity resembling clinical CRS at high cell doses was observed and exacerbated by cyclophosphamide in syngeneic mouse models (23, 24). Therefore, lymphodepleting chemotherapy has been omitted pending a first-in-human safety experience, which is provided by this study. However, we evaluated preinfusion ALC as a surrogate for the degree of preexisting “lymphodepletion,” and all patients with detectable NKG2D-CAR T cells had an ALC ≤0.59 K/μL at infusion. Additional studies are warranted to assess the impact of lymphodepletion strategies on NKG2D ligand surface expression on healthy tissues and incorporation into future studies. NKG2D-CAR T cells were detectable in four patients and did not mediate any clinically relevant toxicity, specifically, no gastrointestinal autoimmune toxicity despite concerns for MICA/B expression on intestinal epithelial cells (41, 42). Several patients developed systemic infections after infusion, which did not trigger any NKG2D-CAR T-cell expansion or toxicity. Although dose escalation started low, the final cohort of 3 × 107 cells approached doses at which toxicity and efficacy have been observed in CD19-directed CAR trials (0.5–1 × 106/kg; refs. 4, 43). Two patients in the highest dose cohort experienced a self-resolving skin rash within 1 to 3 months after infusion, one of which was deemed probably related to CAR T cells, although a skin biopsy was nondiagnostic.

Feasibility of manufacturing and infusion of NKG2D-CAR T cells from patients with AML or MM without cryopreservation was consistently demonstrated, including with cells derived from whole blood draws. Patient blasts and CD138+CD38+ plasma cells were efficiently eliminated during manufacturing. In a single instance, CD19+ B cells persisted and were transduced, similar to a reported phenomenon of leukemic B-cell transduction with a CAR (44). This did not result in clinical sequelae but raises consideration of a T-cell selection step during manufacturing.

Although the study met its primary endpoints, objective clinical efficacy was not demonstrated. However, 1 patient at the highest dose had blood count improvements and clinical stability without additional therapy for months, and several patients experienced unexpected disease stability on subsequent therapies. Our correlative studies interrogated several aspects amenable to optimization in future trials. In most patients, significant NKG2D-CAR T-cell expansion and persistence were not observed. This is consistent with murine models, where repeat infusions are required for complete tumor eradication (15). Owing to the conserved nature of NKG2D, NKG2D-CAR T cells are not immunogenic. Therefore, multiple infusions and higher cell doses commensurate with other CAR trials are now being explored (NCT 03018405; ref. 45).

Although no costimulatory domain was incorporated in the CAR construct, the use of full-length NKG2D endowed the NKG2D-CAR with a costimulatory signal via endogenously expressed Dap10, which is required for NKG2D surface expression. Although Dap10 was not rate limiting to NKG2D-CAR expression, its contribution to CAR T-cell efficacy has not been established and inclusion of additional costimulatory moieties, such as 4-1BB or CD28, might significantly enhance NKG2D-CAR T-cell kinetics and efficacy. Our current manufacturing method yielded predominantly a Tem profile, characteristic of cytotoxic effector function, but limited capacity to self-renew and expand in vivo. Modifications to induce differentiation toward a Tcm/T-memory stem cell (Tscm) profile (46), inclusion of 4-1BB to promote outgrowth of CD8+ Tcm subsets and CAR expansion via distinct metabolic pathways (47), or controlling the CD4/CD8 ratio may enhance future efficacy. Inclusion of a suicide mechanism and extracellular marker to directly identify NKG2D-CAR T cells in PB and tissues could further be beneficial in subsequent trials.

Antigen exposure is an additional factor for CAR T-cell expansion, and high disease burden is predictive of exponential expansion and associated CRS (39, 48). The reported NKG2D ligand expression in AML varies in the literature (14, 49–53). We found that expression on AML blasts and evaluable myeloma cells in our enrolled patients was low relative to CD19 expression in ALL. This may critically affect expansion, particularly because NKG2D-CAR T cells lack an alternative antigen source from nonmalignant cells. NKG2D ligand cleavage, a known process of immune evasion, may have affected surface ligand expression because all patients had detectable plasma concentrations of either soluble MICA, MICB, or both. In contrast, soluble ligands are unlikely to have impaired NKG2D-CAR T-cell function, given that in vitro NKG2D-CAR–mediated cytotoxicity was not inhibited by comparable concentrations of soluble MICA (20). Although additional strategies are required to promote NKG2D-CAR T-cell expansion in vivo, our in vitro studies evaluating the NKG2D-CAR T-cell product in coculture with autologous tumor cells demonstrated that ligand expression is sufficient to induce robust, tumor-specific, and NKG2D-mediated IFNγ. Increases in RANTES early after infusion are likely derived from the CAR T cells, suggesting an element of NKG2D ligand–specific activation (54). However, pharmacologic strategies to selectively enhance NKG2D ligand expression in malignant tissues and basing eligibility on NKG2D ligand expression may be warranted in future studies (52, 55–59).

In summary, our findings represent a critical assessment of the safety and feasibility of NKG2D-CAR T-cell administration in humans. Although expansion and persistence of CAR T cells was limited, no safety concerns were raised with detectable NKG2D-CAR T cells in several subjects, despite clinical conditions of infection and systemic cell stress in which ligand upregulation in healthy tissues might have triggered toxicity. Our findings identify several mechanisms by which therapeutic efficacy might be achieved in subsequent studies and pave the way for further development of this approach.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

S.H. Baumeister reports receiving a commercial research grant from SBIR awarded to Celdara Medical LLC. H. Trebeden-Negre has immediate family members with ownership interest in BlueBirdBio. J. Reder is cofounder, director, and CEO of and has ownership interest in Celdara Medical, LLC. C.L. Sentman reports receiving commercial research funding from Celdara Medical, Celyad SA, and Javelin Oncology; and has ownership interest in and is a consultant/advisory board member for Celyad SA and Celdara Medical. D.E. Gilham has ownership interest in Celyad. R.M. Stone reports receiving commercial research funding from Novartis, Agios, Arog, Lilly, and AbbVie and is a consultant/advisory board member for Astellas, Amfgen, Argenix, Macrogneics, Jansen, Juno, Ono, Roche, Sumitomo, Arog, Novartis, Jazz, Pfizer, AbbVie, Agios, Actinium, and Celgene. R. Soiffer is on the supervisory board at Kiadis and Nmdp Be the Match, is a consultant/advisory board member for Gilead and Juno, and has provided expert testimony for Pfizer. G. Dranoff is Global Head, Immune-Oncology at Novartis. J. Ritz reports receiving commercial research funding from Celdara Medical LLC, and Celyad SA. S. Nikiforow reports receiving a commercial research grant from SBIR awarded to Celdara Medical. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design: S.H. Baumeister, J. Reder, C.L. Sentman, F.F. Lehmann, D.S. Neuberg, G. Dranoff, J. Ritz, S. Nikiforow

Development of methodology: S.H. Baumeister, J. Murad, H. Daley, J. Ritz

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): S.H. Baumeister, J. Murad, H. Trebeden-Negre, J.K. Gicobi, A. Schmucker, F.F. Lehmann, H. DiPietro, K. Cummings, N.C. Munshi, R.M. Stone, R. Soiffer, J. Ritz

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): S.H. Baumeister, J. Murad, L. Werner, J.K. Gicobi, A. Schmucker, D.E. Gilham, F.F. Lehmann, D.S. Neuberg, R. Soiffer, J. Ritz

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: S.H. Baumeister, J. Murad, L. Werner, J. Reder, C.L. Sentman, D.E. Gilham, F.F. Lehmann, N.C. Munshi, R.M. Stone, D.S. Neuberg, R. Soiffer, G. Dranoff, J. Ritz, S. Nikiforow

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): J. Murad, A. Schmucker, J. Reder, I. Galinsky, R. Soiffer, J. Ritz, S. Nikiforow

Study supervision: S.H. Baumeister, J. Murad, J. Reder, F.F. Lehmann, N.C. Munshi, R. Soiffer, G. Dranoff, J. Ritz, S. Nikiforow

Other (performed or supervised clinical laboratory processing of CAR T cells): H. Daley

Other (clinician, direct patient care on study, education to staff and coordination of clinical trial at our site): I. Galinsky

Acknowledgments

We thank DartLab Immunoassay and Flow Cytometry Shared Resource at the Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth for their services with Luminex analysis.

This work was supported in part by NIH NHLBI 2R44HL099217, Celdara Medical LLC, Celyad SA, and an Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation Centers of Excellence grant (S.H. Baumeister).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Immunology Research Online (http://cancerimmunolres.aacrjournals.org/).

  • Received May 25, 2018.
  • Revision received August 2, 2018.
  • Accepted October 29, 2018.
  • Published first November 5, 2018.
  • ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Kochenderfer JN,
    2. Somerville RPT,
    3. Lu T,
    4. Yang JC,
    5. Sherry RM,
    6. Feldman SA,
    7. et al.
    Long-duration complete remissions of diffuse large B cell lymphoma after anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy. Mol Ther 2017;25:2245–53.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Maude SL,
    2. Laetsch TW,
    3. Buechner J,
    4. Rives S,
    5. Boyer M,
    6. Bittencourt H,
    7. et al.
    Tisagenlecleucel in children and young adults with B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2018;378:439–48.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Park JH,
    2. Riviere I,
    3. Gonen M,
    4. Wang X,
    5. Senechal B,
    6. Curran KJ,
    7. et al.
    Long-term follow-up of CD19 CAR therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2018;378:449–59.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Gardner RA,
    2. Finney O,
    3. Annesley C,
    4. Brakke H,
    5. Summers C,
    6. Leger K,
    7. et al.
    Intent-to-treat leukemia remission by CD19 CAR T cells of defined formulation and dose in children and young adults. Blood 2017;129:3322–31.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Neelapu SS,
    2. Locke FL,
    3. Bartlett NL,
    4. Lekakis LJ,
    5. Miklos DB,
    6. Jacobson CA,
    7. et al.
    Axicabtagene ciloleucel CAR T-cell therapy in refractory large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2017;377:2531–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    1. Turtle CJ,
    2. Hanafi LA,
    3. Berger C,
    4. Hudecek M,
    5. Pender B,
    6. Robinson E,
    7. et al.
    Immunotherapy of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with a defined ratio of CD8+ and CD4+ CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells. Sci Transl Med 2016;8:355ra116.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Lanier LL
    . NKG2D receptor and its ligands in host defense. Cancer Immunol Res 2015;3:575–82.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Garrity D,
    2. Call ME,
    3. Feng J,
    4. Wucherpfennig KW
    . The activating NKG2D receptor assembles in the membrane with two signaling dimers into a hexameric structure. PNAS 2005;102:7641–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Rebmann V,
    2. Schutt P,
    3. Brandhorst D,
    4. Opalka B,
    5. Moritz T,
    6. Nowrousian MR,
    7. et al.
    Soluble MICA as an independent prognostic factor for the overall survival and progression-free survival of multiple myeloma patients. Clin Immunol 2007;123:114–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Jinushi M,
    2. Vanneman M,
    3. Munshi NC,
    4. Tai YT,
    5. Prabhala RH,
    6. Ritz J,
    7. et al.
    MHC class I chain-related protein A antibodies and shedding are associated with the progression of multiple myeloma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:1285–90.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Spear P,
    2. Wu MR,
    3. Sentman ML,
    4. Sentman CL
    . NKG2D ligands as therapeutic targets. Cancer Immunity 2013;13:8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. von Strandmann EP,
    2. Hansen HP,
    3. Reiners KS,
    4. Schnell R,
    5. Borchmann P,
    6. Merkert S,
    7. et al.
    A novel bispecific protein (ULBP2-BB4) targeting the NKG2D receptor on natural killer (NK) cells and CD138 activates NK cells and has potent antitumor activity against human multiple myeloma in vitro and in vivo. Blood 2006;107:1955–62.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Groh V,
    2. Rhinehart R,
    3. Secrist H,
    4. Bauer S,
    5. Grabstein KH,
    6. Spies T
    . Broad tumor-associated expression and recognition by tumor-derived gamma delta T cells of MICA and MICB. PNAS 1999;96:6879–84.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Hilpert J,
    2. Grosse-Hovest L,
    3. Grunebach F,
    4. Buechele C,
    5. Nuebling T,
    6. Raum T,
    7. et al.
    Comprehensive analysis of NKG2D ligand expression and release in leukemia: implications for NKG2D-mediated NK cell responses. J Immunol 2012;189:1360–71.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Barber A,
    2. Meehan KR,
    3. Sentman CL
    . Treatment of multiple myeloma with adoptively transferred chimeric NKG2D receptor-expressing T cells. Gene Ther 2011;18:509–16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Barber A,
    2. Zhang T,
    3. Megli CJ,
    4. Wu J,
    5. Meehan KR,
    6. Sentman CL
    . Chimeric NKG2D receptor-expressing T cells as an immunotherapy for multiple myeloma. Exp Hematol 2008;36:1318–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Barber A,
    2. Zhang T,
    3. Sentman CL
    . Immunotherapy with chimeric NKG2D receptors leads to long-term tumor-free survival and development of host antitumor immunity in murine ovarian cancer. J Immunol 2008;180:72–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Zhang T,
    2. Barber A,
    3. Sentman CL
    . Chimeric NKG2D modified T cells inhibit systemic T-cell lymphoma growth in a manner involving multiple cytokines and cytotoxic pathways. Cancer Res 2007;67:11029–36.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Barber A,
    2. Zhang T,
    3. DeMars LR,
    4. Conejo-Garcia J,
    5. Roby KF,
    6. Sentman CL
    . Chimeric NKG2D receptor-bearing T cells as immunotherapy for ovarian cancer. Cancer Res 2007;67:5003–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Zhang T,
    2. Barber A,
    3. Sentman CL
    . Generation of antitumor responses by genetic modification of primary human T cells with a chimeric NKG2D receptor. Cancer Res 2006;66:5927–33.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Zhang T,
    2. Lemoi BA,
    3. Sentman CL
    . Chimeric NK-receptor-bearing T cells mediate antitumor immunotherapy. Blood 2005;106:1544–51.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Spear P,
    2. Barber A,
    3. Rynda-Apple A,
    4. Sentman CL
    . NKG2D CAR T-cell therapy inhibits the growth of NKG2D ligand heterogeneous tumors. Immunol Cell Biol 2013;91:435–40.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Sentman ML,
    2. Murad JM,
    3. Cook WJ,
    4. Wu MR,
    5. Reder J,
    6. Baumeister SH,
    7. et al.
    Mechanisms of acute toxicity in NKG2D chimeric antigen receptor T cell-treated mice. J Immunol 2016;197:4674–85.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. VanSeggelen H,
    2. Hammill JA,
    3. Dvorkin-Gheva A,
    4. Tantalo DG,
    5. Kwiecien JM,
    6. Denisova GF,
    7. et al.
    T cells engineered with chimeric antigen receptors targeting NKG2D ligands display lethal toxicity in mice. Mol Ther 2015;23:1600–10.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Cheson BD,
    2. Bennett JM,
    3. Kopecky KJ,
    4. Buchner T,
    5. Willman CL,
    6. Estey EH,
    7. et al.
    Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for diagnosis, standardization of response criteria, treatment outcomes, and reporting standards for therapeutic trials in acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:4642–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Cheson BD,
    2. Greenberg PL,
    3. Bennett JM,
    4. Lowenberg B,
    5. Wijermans PW,
    6. Nimer SD,
    7. et al.
    Clinical application and proposal for modification of the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria in myelodysplasia. Blood 2006;108:419–25.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Durie BG,
    2. Harousseau JL,
    3. Miguel JS,
    4. Blade J,
    5. Barlogie B,
    6. Anderson K,
    7. et al.
    International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2006;20:1467–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Rajkumar SV,
    2. Harousseau JL,
    3. Durie B,
    4. Anderson KC,
    5. Dimopoulos M,
    6. Kyle R,
    7. et al.
    Consensus recommendations for the uniform reporting of clinical trials: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 1. Blood 2011;117:4691–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Dohner H,
    2. Estey E,
    3. Grimwade D,
    4. Amadori S,
    5. Appelbaum FR,
    6. Buchner T,
    7. et al.
    Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel. Blood 2017;129:424–47.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Zhang T,
    2. Barber A,
    3. Sentman CL
    . Generation of antitumor responses by genetic modification of primary human T cells with a chimeric NKG2D receptor. Cancer Res 2006;66:5927–33.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Riviere I,
    2. Brose K,
    3. Mulligan RC
    . Effects of retroviral vector design on expression of human adenosine deaminase in murine bone marrow transplant recipients engrafted with genetically modified cells. PNAS 1995;92:6733–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Murad JM,
    2. Baumeister SH,
    3. Werner L,
    4. Daley H,
    5. Trebeden-Negre H,
    6. Reder J,
    7. et al.
    Manufacturing development and clinical production of NKG2D chimeric antigen receptor-expressing T cells for autologous adoptive cell therapy. Cytotherapy 2018;20:952–63.
    OpenUrl
  33. 33.↵
    1. Burns MJ,
    2. Nixon GJ,
    3. Foy CA,
    4. Harris N
    . Standardisation of data from real-time quantitative PCR methods – evaluation of outliers and comparison of calibration curves. BMC Biotech 2005;5:31.
    OpenUrl
  34. 34.↵
    1. Chen J,
    2. Reeves L,
    3. Cornetta K
    . Safety testing for replication-competent retrovirus associated with gibbon ape leukemia virus-pseudotyped retroviral vectors. Hum Gene Ther 2001;12:61–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Mehta J,
    2. Singhal S
    . Hyperviscosity syndrome in plasma cell dyscrasias. Semin Thromb Hemost 2003;29:467–71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Sobol U,
    2. Stiff P
    . Neurologic aspects of plasma cell disorders. Handbook Clin Neurol 2014;120:1083–99.
    OpenUrl
  37. 37.↵
    1. Borchers MT,
    2. Harris NL,
    3. Wesselkamper SC,
    4. Vitucci M,
    5. Cosman D
    . NKG2D ligands are expressed on stressed human airway epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2006;291:L222–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Sotillo E,
    2. Barrett DM,
    3. Black KL,
    4. Bagashev A,
    5. Oldridge D,
    6. Wu G,
    7. et al.
    Convergence of acquired mutations and alternative splicing of CD19 enables resistance to CART-19 immunotherapy. Cancer Discov 2015;5:1282–95.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Maude SL,
    2. Shpall EJ,
    3. Grupp SA
    . Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for ALL. Hematology 2014;2014:559–64.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Cummins KD,
    2. Gill S
    . Anti-CD123 chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CART): an evolving treatment strategy for hematological malignancies, and a potential ace-in-the-hole against antigen-negative relapse. Leuk Lymphoma2017:1–15.
  41. 41.↵
    1. Perera L,
    2. Shao L,
    3. Patel A,
    4. Evans K,
    5. Meresse B,
    6. Blumberg R,
    7. et al.
    Expression of nonclassical class I molecules by intestinal epithelial cells. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2007;13:298–307.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Hansen CH,
    2. Holm TL,
    3. Krych L,
    4. Andresen L,
    5. Nielsen DS,
    6. Rune I,
    7. et al.
    Gut microbiota regulates NKG2D ligand expression on intestinal epithelial cells. Eur J Immunol 2013;43:447–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Brudno JN,
    2. Somerville RP,
    3. Shi V,
    4. Rose JJ,
    5. Halverson DC,
    6. Fowler DH,
    7. et al.
    Allogeneic T cells that express an anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor induce remissions of B-Cell malignancies that progress after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation without causing graft-versus-host disease. J Clin Oncol 2016;34:1112–21.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Lacey SXJ,
    2. Ruella M,
    3. Barrett DM,
    4. Kulikovskaya I,
    5. Ambrose DE,
    6. Patel PR,
    7. et al.
    Cars in leukemia: relapse with antigen-negative leukemia originating from a single B Cell expressing the leukemia-targeting CAR. Blood 2016;128:281.
    OpenUrl
  45. 45.↵
    1. Sallman DA,
    2. Brayer J,
    3. Sagatys EM,
    4. Lonez C,
    5. Breman E,
    6. Agaugue S,
    7. et al.
    NKG2D-based chimeric antigen receptor therapy induced remission in a relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia patient. Haematologica 2018;103:e424–e426.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Gattinoni L,
    2. Restifo NP
    . Moving T memory stem cells to the clinic. Blood 2013;121:567–8.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    1. Kawalekar OU,
    2. RS OC,
    3. Fraietta JA,
    4. Guo L,
    5. McGettigan SE,
    6. Posey AD Jr.,
    7. et al.
    Distinct signaling of coreceptors regulates specific metabolism pathways and impacts memory development in CAR T cells. Immunity 2016;44:712.
    OpenUrl
  48. 48.↵
    1. Maude SL,
    2. Frey N,
    3. Shaw PA,
    4. Aplenc R,
    5. Barrett DM,
    6. Bunin NJ,
    7. et al.
    Chimeric antigen receptor T cells for sustained remissions in leukemia. N Engl J Med 2014;371:1507–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Mastaglio S,
    2. Wong E,
    3. Perera T,
    4. Ripley J,
    5. Blombery P,
    6. Smyth MJ,
    7. et al.
    Natural killer receptor ligand expression on acute myeloid leukemia impacts survival and relapse after chemotherapy. Blood Adv 2018;2:335–46.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    1. Sanchez-Correa B,
    2. Morgado S,
    3. Gayoso I,
    4. Bergua JM,
    5. Casado JG,
    6. Arcos MJ,
    7. et al.
    Human NK cells in acute myeloid leukaemia patients: analysis of NK cell-activating receptors and their ligands. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2011;60:1195–205.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. 51.↵
    1. Pende D,
    2. Spaggiari GM,
    3. Marcenaro S,
    4. Martini S,
    5. Rivera P,
    6. Capobianco A,
    7. et al.
    Analysis of the receptor-ligand interactions in the natural killer-mediated lysis of freshly isolated myeloid or lymphoblastic leukemias: evidence for the involvement of the Poliovirus receptor (CD155) and Nectin-2 (CD112). Blood 2005;105:2066–73.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. 52.↵
    1. Diermayr S,
    2. Himmelreich H,
    3. Durovic B,
    4. Mathys-Schneeberger A,
    5. Siegler U,
    6. Langenkamp U,
    7. et al.
    NKG2D ligand expression in AML increases in response to HDAC inhibitor valproic acid and contributes to allorecognition by NK-cell lines with single KIR-HLA class I specificities. Blood 2008;111:1428–36.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. 53.↵
    1. Salih HR,
    2. Antropius H,
    3. Gieseke F,
    4. Lutz SZ,
    5. Kanz L,
    6. Rammensee HG,
    7. et al.
    Functional expression and release of ligands for the activating immunoreceptor NKG2D in leukemia. Blood 2003;102:1389–96.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. 54.↵
    1. Levy JA
    . The unexpected pleiotropic activities of RANTES. J Immunol 2009;182:3945–6.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  55. 55.↵
    1. Poggi A,
    2. Catellani S,
    3. Garuti A,
    4. Pierri I,
    5. Gobbi M,
    6. Zocchi MR
    . Effective in vivo induction of NKG2D ligands in acute myeloid leukaemias by all-trans-retinoic acid or sodium valproate. Leukemia 2009;23:641–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. 56.↵
    1. Skov S,
    2. Pedersen MT,
    3. Andresen L,
    4. Straten PT,
    5. Woetmann A,
    6. Odum N
    . Cancer cells become susceptible to natural killer cell killing after exposure to histone deacetylase inhibitors due to glycogen synthase kinase-3-dependent expression of MHC class I-related chain A and B. Cancer Res 2005;65:11136–45.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. 57.↵
    1. Soriani A,
    2. Zingoni A,
    3. Cerboni C,
    4. Iannitto ML,
    5. Ricciardi MR,
    6. Di Gialleonardo V,
    7. et al.
    ATM-ATR-dependent up-regulation of DNAM-1 and NKG2D ligands on multiple myeloma cells by therapeutic agents results in enhanced NK-cell susceptibility and is associated with a senescent phenotype. Blood 2009;113:3503–11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. 58.↵
    1. Rohner A,
    2. Langenkamp U,
    3. Siegler U,
    4. Kalberer CP,
    5. Wodnar-Filipowicz A
    . Differentiation-promoting drugs up-regulate NKG2D ligand expression and enhance the susceptibility of acute myeloid leukemia cells to natural killer cell-mediated lysis. Leuk Res 2007;31:1393–402.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. 59.↵
    1. Abruzzese MP,
    2. Bilotta MT,
    3. Fionda C,
    4. Zingoni A,
    5. Soriani A,
    6. Vulpis E,
    7. et al.
    Inhibition of bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) proteins increases NKG2D ligand MICA expression and sensitivity to NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity in multiple myeloma cells: role of cMYC-IRF4-miR-125b interplay. J Hematol Oncol 2016;9:134.
    OpenUrl
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Immunology Research: 7 (1)
January 2019
Volume 7, Issue 1
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Editorial Board (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Immunology Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Phase I Trial of Autologous CAR T Cells Targeting NKG2D Ligands in Patients with AML/MDS and Multiple Myeloma
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Immunology Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Immunology Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Phase I Trial of Autologous CAR T Cells Targeting NKG2D Ligands in Patients with AML/MDS and Multiple Myeloma
Susanne H. Baumeister, Joana Murad, Lillian Werner, Heather Daley, Helene Trebeden-Negre, Joanina K. Gicobi, Adam Schmucker, Jake Reder, Charles L. Sentman, David E. Gilham, Frédéric F. Lehmann, Ilene Galinsky, Heidi DiPietro, Kristen Cummings, Nikhil C. Munshi, Richard M. Stone, Donna S. Neuberg, Robert Soiffer, Glenn Dranoff, Jerome Ritz and Sarah Nikiforow
Cancer Immunol Res January 1 2019 (7) (1) 100-112; DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0307

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Phase I Trial of Autologous CAR T Cells Targeting NKG2D Ligands in Patients with AML/MDS and Multiple Myeloma
Susanne H. Baumeister, Joana Murad, Lillian Werner, Heather Daley, Helene Trebeden-Negre, Joanina K. Gicobi, Adam Schmucker, Jake Reder, Charles L. Sentman, David E. Gilham, Frédéric F. Lehmann, Ilene Galinsky, Heidi DiPietro, Kristen Cummings, Nikhil C. Munshi, Richard M. Stone, Donna S. Neuberg, Robert Soiffer, Glenn Dranoff, Jerome Ritz and Sarah Nikiforow
Cancer Immunol Res January 1 2019 (7) (1) 100-112; DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0307
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Activin A Mediates Radiation-Induced Antitumor Immunity
  • Mechanisms to CD3-Bispecific Antibody Therapy
  • Improved Estimation of T-cell Receptor Repertoire Diversity
Show more Research Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Cancer Immunology Essentials

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Immunology Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Immunology Research
eISSN: 2326-6074
ISSN: 2326-6066

Advertisement