Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Cancer Immunology Essentials
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Toolbox: Coding and Computation
      • Toolbox: Signatures and Cells
      • "Best of" Collection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Immunology Research
Cancer Immunology Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Cancer Immunology Essentials
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Toolbox: Coding and Computation
      • Toolbox: Signatures and Cells
      • "Best of" Collection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Research Articles

IL35 Hinders Endogenous Antitumor T-cell Immunity and Responsiveness to Immunotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer

Bhalchandra Mirlekar, Daniel Michaud, Ryan Searcy, Kevin Greene and Yuliya Pylayeva-Gupta
Bhalchandra Mirlekar
1Department of Genetics, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
2The Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Michaud
2The Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
3Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ryan Searcy
1Department of Genetics, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
2The Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin Greene
2The Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
4Department of Pathology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuliya Pylayeva-Gupta
1Department of Genetics, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
2The Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: yuliyap1@email.unc.edu
DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-17-0710 Published September 2018
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    IL35 is upregulated in CD4+ T cells and B cells in PDA. A, Representative flow cytometry plots of CD4+ and CD19+ cells isolated from the spleens of WT or KC mice at 4 months of age. Cells were processed for intracellular staining with anti-p35 and anti-Ebi3. Percentage of p35+Ebi3+CD4+ T cells and p35+Ebi3+CD19+ B cells is indicated. B, Percentage of IL35+ splenic T cells, B cells, or myeloid cells in WT (n = 12) or splenic and intratumoral IL35+ T cells, B cells, or myeloid cells KC mice (n = 12). C, Percentage of IL35+ splenic T cells, B cells, or myeloid cells in WT or splenic and intratumoral IL35+ splenic T cells, B cells, or myeloid cells in mice orthotopically injected with KPC 4662 cells and collected 3 weeks after tumor cell injection. D, Representative flow cytometry plots of intratumoral B conventional (Bcon; CD19+CD21+CD5−CD1d−) and Bregs (CD19+CD21hiCD5+CD1dhi) from KC mice at 4 months of age or mice orthotopically injected with KPC cells and collected 3 weeks after tumor cell injection. Cells were analyzed by staining with anti-p35 antibody. Percentage of p35+ Bcon or Bregs is indicated. E, Representative flow cytometry plots of intratumoral CD4+Foxp3− T cells and CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs from KC mice at 4 months of age. Cells were analyzed by staining with anti-p35 antibody. Percentage of p35+ CD4+Foxp3− or Tregs is indicated. F, Representative flow cytometry plots of intratumoral CD4+Foxp3− T cells and Tregs from mice orthotopically injected with KPC cells and collected 3 weeks after tumor cell injection. Cells were analyzed by staining with anti-p35 antibody. Percentage of p35+ CD4+Foxp3− or Tregs is indicated. error bars, SEM. p-values were calculated using Student t test (unpaired, two-tailed); NS, not significant; *, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.001. Data represent 3 independent experiments.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    IL35 regulation of tumor growth is accompanied by suppression of CD4+ effector T-cell activity and expansion of Tregs. A, Representative images of pancreatic tumors from WT, Il10−/−, p35−/−, and Ebi3−/− mice orthotopically injected with KPC 4662 cells and collected at 3 weeks after injection of tumor cells. B, Quantification of tumor weights from WT, Il10−/−, p35−/−, and Ebi3−/− (N = 12; n = 3/group) mice. C, Quantification of tumor weights from WT (n = 9), Il10−/− (n = 9), and p35−/− (n = 9) mice orthotopically injected with KPC 2173 cells and collected 3 weeks after tumor cell injection. D, Representative flow cytometry plots of gating strategy for identifying CD4+ T cells and frequency of intratumoral CD4+CD25− effector T cells isolated from WT, Il10−/−, p35−/−, and Ebi3−/− mice orthotopically injected with KPC 4662 cells and collected 3 weeks after injection of tumor cells. Percentage of CD45+CD4+ cells is indicated. E, Quantification of the frequency of CD45+CD4+ T cells from WT, Il10−/−, p35−/−, and Ebi3−/− (n = 3/group) mice. F, Representative flow-cytometric plots of CD4+IFNγ+ and CD4+TNFα+ T cells isolated from WT, Il10−/−, p35−/−, and Ebi3−/− mice orthotopically injected with KPC 4662 cells and collected 3 weeks after injection of tumor cells. G, Quantification of the frequency of CD4+IFNγ+ T cells (left graph, % of CD4+ T cells) and CD4+TNFα+ T cells (right graph, % of CD4+ T cells) from WT, Il10−/−, p35−/−, and Ebi3−/− (n = 3/group) mice. H, Representative flow-cytometric plots of intratumoral CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs isolated from WT, Il10−/−, p35−/−, and Ebi3−/− mice. I, Quantification of the frequency of CD4+Foxp3+ (% of CD4+ T cells) from WT, Il10−/−, p35−/−, and Ebi3−/− (n = 3/group) mice. J, Mean CD4+ effector T cell to Treg ratio was calculated based on the percentage of positive lymphocyte population determined by flow cytometry. Error bars, SEM. P values were calculated using Student t test (unpaired, two-tailed); NS, not significant; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. Data represent 3–4 independent experiments.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    IL27 signaling does not confer immunosuppression in PDA. A, Representative images of pancreatic tumors from WT, Il27ra−/−, and p35−/− mice orthotopically injected with KPC 4662 cells and collected at 3 weeks after injection of tumor cells. B, Quantification of tumor weights from WT, Il27ra−/−, and p35−/− (n = 3/group) mice. C, Representative flow-cytometric plots of intratumoral CD4+IFNγ+, CD4+TNFα+, and CD4+Foxp3+ T cells isolated from WT, Il27ra−/−, and p35−/− mice. D, Quantification of the frequency of intratumoral CD4+IFNγ+ T cells (left graph, % of CD4+ T cells), CD4+TNFα+ T cells (middle graph, % of CD4+ T cells), or CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (right graph, % of CD4+ T cells) from WT, Il27ra−/−, and p35−/− (n = 3/group) mice. E, Quantification of the frequency of intratumoral CD45+CD8+ T cells from WT, Il27ra−/−, and p35−/− (n = 3/group) mice determined by flow cytometry. F, Representative gating strategy for sorting CD8+ T cells and flow cytometry plots of intratumoral CD8+IFNγ+ T cells isolated from WT, Il27ra−/−, and p35−/− mice. Percentage of CD8+ T cells is indicated. G, Quantification of the frequency of intratumoral CD8+IFNγ+ T cells (% of CD8+ T cells) from WT, Il27ra−/−, and p35−/− (n = 3/group) mice. Error bars, SEM. P values were calculated using Student t test (unpaired, two-tailed); NS, not significant; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. Data represent 3 independent experiments.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    IL35 suppresses cytotoxic CD8+ T-cell infiltration and activity in PDA. A, Immunohistochemical detection of CD8+ T cells by DAB in tumor tissues from WT, Il10−/−, p35−/−, and Ebi3−/− mice orthotopically injected with KPC 4662 cells and collected at 3 weeks after injection of tumor cells. Scale bars, 100 μm. B, Quantification of the frequency of tumor-infiltrating CD45+CD8+ T cells from WT, Il10−/−, p35−/−, and Ebi3−/− (n = 3/group) mice determined by flow cytometry. C, Mean CD8+ cytotoxic T cell to Treg ratio was calculated based on the percentage of positive lymphocyte population determined by flow cytometry. D, Representative flow cytometry plots of intratumoral CD8+IFNγ+ T cells isolated from WT, Il10−/−, p35−/−, and Ebi3−/− mice. Percentage of CD8+ T cells is indicated. E, Quantification of frequency of CD8+IFNγ+ T cells (% of CD8+ T cells) from WT, Il10−/−, p35−/−, and Ebi3−/− (n = 12) mice. F, Representative immunofluorescence staining. Top, Ebi3 (red) and CD20 (green); bottom, Ebi3 (red) and CD4 (green) in samples of human PDA. Scale bars, 25 μm. G, Number of CD8+ T cells in tumor cell nests as a function of low versus high numbers of Ebi3+ immune cells. Each point is the number of tumor cell adjacent CD8+ T cells per 10× FOV. Data were derived from counting 3 to 6 FOV per tumor sample (n = 11 tumor samples). Error bars, SEM. P values were calculated using Student t test (unpaired, two-tailed); NS, not significant; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. Data represent 3–4 independent experiments.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Deficiency in IL35 potentiates efficacy of anti–PD-1 checkpoint blockade. A, Schematic of the antibody treatment regimen. Anti-CD8 or control IgG (red arrows) was administered for 3 days prior to tumor cell injection and then twice weekly on days 3, 5, 9, 11, 15, and 17. Administration of anti–PD-1 (green arrows) was initiated on day 7 after tumors reached approximately 4 mm in diameter (blue circle). Two more doses of anti–PD-1 were administered on days 9 and 11. Mice were sacrificed 3 weeks after tumor cell injection. B, Quantification of tumor weights from WT and p35−/− (n = 3/group) mice orthotopically injected with KPC 4662 cells and treated with antibodies as described in A. C, Representative flow-cytometric plots of intratumoral CD4+IFNγ+, CD4+TNFα+, and CD4+Foxp3+ T cells isolated from WT and p35−/− mice. Percentage of CD4+ T cells is indicated. D, Quantification of the frequency of intratumoral CD4+TNFα+ T cells (% of CD4+ T cells) from WT and p35−/− (n = 3/group) mice. E, Quantification of the frequency of intratumoral CD4+IFNγ+ T cells (% of CD4+ T cells) from WT and p35−/− (n = 3/group) mice. F, Quantification of the frequency of intratumoral CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (% of CD4+ T cells) from WT and p35−/− (n = 9) mice. H, Quantification of the frequency of tumor-infiltrating CD45+CD8+ T cells by flow cytometry from WT and p35−/− (n = 3/group) mice. I, Representative flow-cytometric plots of CD8+IFNγ+ T cells isolated from WT and p35−/− mice. Percentage of CD8+ T cells is indicated. J, Quantification of the frequency of CD8+IFNγ+ T cells (% of CD8 T cells) from WT and p35−/− (n = 3/group) mice. Error bars, SEM. P values were calculated using the Student t test (unpaired, two-tailed); NS, not significant; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. Data represent 3 independent experiments.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplementary Data

    • Supplementary Figure 1 - This figure demonstrates that host deficiency for IL-35 does not affect myeloid cell frequency
    • Supplementary Figure 2 - This figure demonstrates that infiltrating immune cells contain low amounts of cytokines IL12 and IL27
    • Supplementary Figure 3 - This figure demonstrates that deletion of IL12 subunit p40 does not activate anti-tumor immune response
    • Supplementary Figure 4 - This Figure demonstrates examples of p35+ and Ebi3+ B cells and T cells in primary human PDAC tumors, as well as gives examples of CD8 T cell infltrated versus depleted regions in tumors
    • Supplementary Figure 5 - This Figure documents successful depletion of CD8 T cells from mice, and shows results of tumor growth studies on mice with IL35 deficiency and treated with anti-PD1
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Immunology Research: 6 (9)
September 2018
Volume 6, Issue 9
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Editorial Board (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Immunology Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
IL35 Hinders Endogenous Antitumor T-cell Immunity and Responsiveness to Immunotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Immunology Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Immunology Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
IL35 Hinders Endogenous Antitumor T-cell Immunity and Responsiveness to Immunotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer
Bhalchandra Mirlekar, Daniel Michaud, Ryan Searcy, Kevin Greene and Yuliya Pylayeva-Gupta
Cancer Immunol Res September 1 2018 (6) (9) 1014-1024; DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-17-0710

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
IL35 Hinders Endogenous Antitumor T-cell Immunity and Responsiveness to Immunotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer
Bhalchandra Mirlekar, Daniel Michaud, Ryan Searcy, Kevin Greene and Yuliya Pylayeva-Gupta
Cancer Immunol Res September 1 2018 (6) (9) 1014-1024; DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-17-0710
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Machine Learning–Based Prognostic Marker of HCC
  • Lenalidomide Turns Myeloma-Associated Macrophage Tumoricidal
  • Inflammasome-Independent IL1β Inhibits Antitumor Immunity
Show more Research Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Cancer Immunology Essentials

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Immunology Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Immunology Research
eISSN: 2326-6074
ISSN: 2326-6066

Advertisement