Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Cancer Immunology Essentials
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Toolbox: Advanced Technologies for Antigen Identification
      • Toolbox: Coding and Computation
      • Toolbox: Signatures and Cells
      • "Best of" Collection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Immunology Research
Cancer Immunology Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Cancer Immunology Essentials
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Toolbox: Advanced Technologies for Antigen Identification
      • Toolbox: Coding and Computation
      • Toolbox: Signatures and Cells
      • "Best of" Collection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Research Articles

Protumor Steering of Cancer Inflammation by p50 NF-κB Enhances Colorectal Cancer Progression

Chiara Porta, Alessandro Ippolito, Francesca Maria Consonni, Lorenzo Carraro, Giuseppe Celesti, Carmen Correale, Fabio Grizzi, Fabio Pasqualini, Silvia Tartari, Maurizio Rinaldi, Paolo Bianchi, Fiorella Balzac, Stefania Vetrano, Emilia Turco, Emilio Hirsch, Luigi Laghi and Antonio Sica
Chiara Porta
1Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro,” Novara, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: antonio.sica@uniupo.it chiara.porta@uniupo.it
Alessandro Ippolito
1Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro,” Novara, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francesca Maria Consonni
1Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro,” Novara, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lorenzo Carraro
1Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro,” Novara, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giuseppe Celesti
2Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carmen Correale
2Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabio Grizzi
2Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabio Pasqualini
2Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Silvia Tartari
2Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maurizio Rinaldi
1Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro,” Novara, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paolo Bianchi
2Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fiorella Balzac
3Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Molecular Biotechnology Center, Torino, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefania Vetrano
2Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emilia Turco
3Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Molecular Biotechnology Center, Torino, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emilio Hirsch
3Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Molecular Biotechnology Center, Torino, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luigi Laghi
2Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Antonio Sica
1Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro,” Novara, Italy.
2Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Italy.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: antonio.sica@uniupo.it chiara.porta@uniupo.it
DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-17-0036 Published May 2018
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Association between distinct inflammatory gene clusters and clinical outcome. A, Expression of selected inflammatory genes was analyzed in total RNA extracted from colons of mice with colitis (after the first cycle of DSS administration), tumors, and adjacent healthy tissue at the end of the AOM/DSS experiment. Total RNA from colon of untreated mice was used as control. Normalized qPCR results shown as fold increase over control. Cluster 1: genes similarly upregulated in colitis and tumor stages. Cluster 2: genes reaching the maximum peak of expression at the tumor stage. Box: the 25th–75th percentiles; line: the median; whiskers: range. *, P ≤ 0.05 by two-tailed Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn correction for multiple comparisons. Control (−): white boxes, N = 4 different mice; colitis: green boxes, N = 9 different mice; tumor: blue boxes, N = 13 different mice; healthy (AOM/DSS): gray boxes, N = 5 different mice. B, Immunofluorescence of nuclear p50 (white) and p65 (red) in colonic and TAMs (F4/80+ cells; green). N = 326 single F4/80+ cells analyzed from 7 total images of colons from 2 untreated WT mice; N = 1314 single F4/80+ cells analyzed from 52 total images of 16 tumors from 5 AOM/DSS-treated WT mice. Error bars, SEM. *, P < 0.05 by two-tailed unpaired t test. Representative images shown. Scale bars: 10 μm.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    p50 NF-κB promotes CAC by hampering M1/Th1 inflammation. To induce CAC, mice were treated with AOM and DSS. A, Top: Body weight monitored every 2 to 3 days during the experimental period (multi t test, starting from day 10; *, FDR < 0.05; N = 16). Bottom: Colon length measured at the time of mice sacrifice (day 100). Data shown are mean ± SEM of different mice from two independent experiments. ***, P < 0.001 by two-tailed Mann–Whitney test. Untreated WT: N = 6; untreated p50–/–: N = 6; AOM/DSS-treated WT: N = 17; AOM/DSS-treated p50–/–: N = 12. Center: Ulceration and degree of inflammation (colitis score) analyzed on colon swiss roll sections by H&E. Data shown are mean ± SEM of different mice from two independent experiments. *, P < 0.05 by two-tailed Mann–Whitney test. WT: N = 11; p50–/–: N = 9. B, Colons were longitudinally opened and polyps were counted. Data shown are mean ± SEM of different mice from two independent experiments. ***, P < 0.001 by two-tailed Mann–Whitney test. WT: N = 11; p50–/–: N = 9. Representative images are shown. The total number and the size of tumors were counted and tumor burden was calculated for each animal. Data shown are mean ± SEM of different mice or tumors from two independent experiments. *, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.001 by two-tailed Mann–Whitney test. N = 11 different WT mice; N = 9 different p50–/– mice; N = 52 WT tumors; N = 9 p50–/– tumors). Representative images are shown. Scale bars: 1,000 μm. C, Top: Total RNA from tumors of AOM/DSS-treated WT and p50–/– mice analyzed for the expression of the genes belonging to clusters 1 and 2; bottom: additional Th1/M1 genes. Results are expressed as fold induction over WT tumor expression. Data shown are mean ± SEM of different mice from two independent experiments. *, P < 0.05 by one-tailed Mann–Whitney test N = 13 WT mice; N = 15 p50–/– mice. D, Top: FACS analysis of colorectal cancer lesions for selective M1 gene products in TAMs (CD11b+F4/80+ cells) and bottom: the frequency of IFNγ-expressing T cells. Intracellular expression of cytokines (IL12, TNFα, and IFNγ) was measured upon 3 hours of stimulation with 50 ng/mL PMA and 1 μg/mL ionomycin in presence of 5 μg/mL Brefeldin A. Data shown are mean ± SEM. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01 by two-tailed t test. N = 6 WT mice; N = 5 p50–/– mice. Center: Representative FACS histograms of M1 markers are shown.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Administration of M1 cytokines inhibits CAC development. A, Treatment regimen with IL12 and CXCL10 during CAC induction. B, Body weight loss during the treatment. *, FDR < 0.05 by multi t test of treated versus vehicle. N = 10 vehicle-treated mice; N = 7 IL12-treated mice; N = 8 CXCL10 treated mice. C, Colon length of mice treated with vehicle, IL12, or CXCL10, and D, analysis of tumor development (number of polyps) was performed at day 80 on longitudinally opened colons. Representative images are shown. Data shown are mean ± SEM. *, P < 0.05 by one-tailed Mann–Whitney test. N = 5 vehicle-treated mice; N = 6 IL12-treated mice; N = 6 CXCL10-treated mice.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Lack of p50 in ApcMin mice inhibits spontaneous intestinal tumor development. A, Histological analysis of small gut and colons harvested from ApcMin and ApcMinp50–/– mice at 12 or 18 weeks of age. Number and size of tumors was monitored, and tumor burden calculated for each mouse. Data shown are mean ± SEM of different mice or tumors. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001 by two-tailed Mann–Whitney test. N = 7 ApcMin mice 12 weeks old; N = 8 ApcMinp50–/– mice 12 weeks old; N = 13 ApcMin mice 18 weeks old; N = 15 ApcMinp50–/– mice 18 weeks old; N = 76 tumors from ApcMin mice 12 weeks old; N = 39 tumors from ApcMinp50–/– mice 12 weeks old; N = 155 tumors from ApcMin mice 18 weeks old; N = 133 tumors from ApcMinp50–/– mice 18 weeks old). B, Survival time of ApcMin and ApcMinp50–/– mice. ***, P < 0.0001 by log-rank Mantel–Cox test. N = 54 ApcMin mice; N = 26 ApcMinp50–/– mice. C and D, expression of gene clusters 1 and 2, and additional Th1/M1 genes in colorectal cancer lesions from ApcMin mice versus C, the adjacent healthy colonic mucosa and D, colorectal cancer lesions from ApcMinp50–/– mice. Data shown are mean ± SEM. *, P < 0.05 by one-tailed, Mann–Whitney test. N = 6 ApcMin mice; N = 6 ApcMinp50–/– mice.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Modulation of gut-associated leukocyte populations by p50 NF-κB. A, Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded colons from AOM/DSS-treated and untreated mice (WT and p50–/–) were evaluated for the number of macrophages (F4/80+), monocytes (Ly6C+), neutrophils (Ly6G+), and T lymphocytes (CD3+) by immunohistochemistry. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001 one-tailed Mann–Whitney test of WT (N = 5) versus p50–/– (N = 4) mice. B, Immunofluorescence analysis of frozen colonic samples were performed to evaluate NK (CD3–NKp46+) and NKT (CD3+NKp46+) cells. Data shown are mean ± SEM of different tumors (WT N = 15; p50–/–N = 5) or fields (WT N = 23; p50–/–N = 23) of different mice. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01 one-tailed Mann–Whitney test of WT (N = 6) versus p50–/– (N = 3) mice. C, FACS analysis of colorectal cancer lesions for the frequency of the depicted immune cell populations. Data shown are mean ± SEM of different mice. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001 two-tailed t test. N = 4 WT mice; N = 4 p50–/– mice. D, Transcripts of genes encoding for markers of different leukocyte populations from healthy colons and tumors of untreated and AOM/DSS-treated mice. Results are shown as fold induction over healthy untreated WT mice. Data shown are mean ± SEM. *, P < 0.05 by one-tailed Mann–Whitney test. N = 4 untreated WT mice; N = 4 untreated p50–/– mice; N = 5 AOM/DSS-treated WT mice; N = 6 AOM/DSS-treated p50–/– mice). E, T cells were depleted from WT and p50–/– mice during the entire experimental period by i.p. injections of anti-CD4 (α-CD4) and anti-CD8 (α-CD8). Control mice received vehicle (−) only. Tumor development was evaluated. Representative images of longitudinally opened colons at day 80 are shown. Data shown are mean ± SEM. *, P < 0.05 two-tailed Kruskal–Wallis test N = 11 vehicle-treated WT mice; N = 10 vehicle-treated p50–/– mice; N = 10 anti-CD4/CD8–treated WT mice; N = 7 anti-CD4/CD8–treated p50–/– mice).

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Lack of p50 increases apoptosis of both colonic epithelial and tumor cells after AOM/DSS administration. A, Activated cleaved caspase-3 in colon sections from AOM/DSS-treated and untreated mice by immunohistochemistry and digital image analysis. Representative images are shown. Data shown are mean ± SEM of different fields. Scale bars, 20 μm. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01 by one-tailed Mann–Whitney test. N = 4 fields from 1 untreated WT mice; N = 4 fields from 1 untreated p50–/– mice; N = 16 total tumor fields and N = 14 total nontumor fields from 5 different AOM/DSS-treated WT mice; N = 8 total tumor fields and N = 14 total nontumor fields from 3 different AOM/DSS-treated p50–/– mice. B, Transcripts of survival genes were evaluated in total RNA isolated from colon and tumor lesions of untreated and AOM/DSS-treated mice. Normalized qPCR results are shown as fold induction over healthy untreated WT mice. Data shown are mean ± SEM. *, P < 0.05 by one-tailed Mann–Whitney test. N = 2 untreated WT mice; N = 2 untreated p50–/– mice; N = 5 AOM/DSS-treated WT mice; N = 6 AOM/DSS-treated p50–/– mice.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Correlation between the number of p50 NF-κB+ TAMs and the clinical response of colorectal cancer patients. A, Histologic analysis of colons from AOM/DSS-treated chimeric mice (p50–/– BM in WT recipients, N = 6 and WT BM in p50–/– recipients, N = 7) with respect to control mice (N = 14 lethally irradiated WT mice reconstituted with WT BM). *, P < 0.05 by one-tailed Mann–Whitney test. B, Analysis of colorectal cancer lesions in AOM/DSS-treated p50Fl/Fl (N = 6) and p50Fl/Fl;Lyz2Cre (N = 7; top) and p50Fl/Fl (N = 6); p50Fl/Fl;Villin-Cre (N = 6; bottom) mice. Data shown are mean ± SEM. *, P ≤ 0.05 by one-tailed Mann–Whitney test. C, Immunofluorescence of nuclear p50+ TAMs (CD68+ cells) in colorectal cancer lesions from 26 colorectal cancer patients, stage II and III. Left, analysis of the density of TAM with p50+ nuclei at the invasive margin in relation with disease recurrence within 4 years from surgery. Two-tailed t test; **, P < 0.01. Center and right, the Kaplan–Meier analysis shows both DFS and colorectal cancer-specific survival (CRC-SS) of colorectal cancer patients, in relation to high (N = 10; >mean; black line) or low (N = 16; <mean; gray line) number of p50+TAMs at the invasive margin. P values calculated by log-rank Mantel–Cox test; P < 0.05 considered significant. D, Expression of selected type I inflammatory genes in total RNA obtained from 26 colorectal cancer patients (stage II and III colorectal cancer) in relation to high (>mean; black dots) or low (<mean; gray squares) number of p50+TAMs located at the invasive margin. Data cleaned by outliers passed D'Agostino and Pearson omnibus normality test and analyzed by two-tailed t test; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. E and F, Expression of selected type 1 inflammatory genes in total RNA from 47 stage II and III human colorectal cancer specimens. Results are normalized over the housekeeping gene β-actin. For each gene transcript, cutoff value was extrapolated by ROC curve analysis (IL12A 4.28 × 10−5; IL12B 7.88 × 10−5; TBX21 3.35 × 10−4; CXCL9 3.72 × 10−3; CXCL10 8.32 × 10−3; IL21 1.13 × 10−4). The Kaplan–Meier curves show (E) DFS and (F) CRC-SS of colorectal cancer patients in relation with the expression of the selected type 1 inflammatory genes in tumor samples. Black line: low gene transcripts (<cutoff value; IL12A N = 18; IL12B N = 37; TBX21 N = 32; CXCL9 N = 26; CXCL10 N = 29; IL21 N = 25); gray line: high gene transcripts (>cutoff value; IL12A N = 29; IL12B N = 10; TBX21 N = 15; CXCL9 N = 21; CXCL10 N = 18; IL21 N = 22). P values were calculated by log-rank Mantel–Cox test; P < 0.05 considered significant.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplementary Data

    • Supplementary materials and methods, figures and legends - S1: Analysis of p50 NF-κB ablation in myeloid cells (p50Fl/Fl; Lyz2Cre mice) and enterocytes (p50Fl/Fl; VillinCre mice). S2: Analysis of inflammatory gene expression at different phases of colitisassociated CRC (CAC) development. S3: Lack of p50 NF-κB exacerbates DSS-induced colitis. S4: Genetic ablation of p50 unleashes anti-tumor M1-polarized activation of TAMs. S5: Lack of p50 shapes gut associated immune populations in AOM/DSS treated. S6: Lack of p50 selectively impairs lamina propria monocytes/macrophages accumulation in steady state conditions. mice. S7: Wt and p50-/- mice show similar levels of proliferative colonic cancer cells. S8: Nuclear accumulation of p50 in TAM at the inner tumor tissue does not correlate with CRC patients' outcome.
    • Table S1 - CRC patients table
    • Table S2 - Primers table
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Immunology Research: 6 (5)
May 2018
Volume 6, Issue 5
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Editorial Board (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Immunology Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Protumor Steering of Cancer Inflammation by p50 NF-κB Enhances Colorectal Cancer Progression
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Immunology Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Immunology Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Protumor Steering of Cancer Inflammation by p50 NF-κB Enhances Colorectal Cancer Progression
Chiara Porta, Alessandro Ippolito, Francesca Maria Consonni, Lorenzo Carraro, Giuseppe Celesti, Carmen Correale, Fabio Grizzi, Fabio Pasqualini, Silvia Tartari, Maurizio Rinaldi, Paolo Bianchi, Fiorella Balzac, Stefania Vetrano, Emilia Turco, Emilio Hirsch, Luigi Laghi and Antonio Sica
Cancer Immunol Res May 1 2018 (6) (5) 578-593; DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-17-0036

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Protumor Steering of Cancer Inflammation by p50 NF-κB Enhances Colorectal Cancer Progression
Chiara Porta, Alessandro Ippolito, Francesca Maria Consonni, Lorenzo Carraro, Giuseppe Celesti, Carmen Correale, Fabio Grizzi, Fabio Pasqualini, Silvia Tartari, Maurizio Rinaldi, Paolo Bianchi, Fiorella Balzac, Stefania Vetrano, Emilia Turco, Emilio Hirsch, Luigi Laghi and Antonio Sica
Cancer Immunol Res May 1 2018 (6) (5) 578-593; DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-17-0036
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • CAR Tonic Signaling
  • DGKA Mediates Resistance to Anti–PD-1 Therapy
  • Boosting Eomes Expression Augments Antitumor Immunity
Show more Research Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Cancer Immunology Essentials

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Immunology Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Immunology Research
eISSN: 2326-6074
ISSN: 2326-6066

Advertisement