Advertisement
Cancer Immunology at the Crossroads

Re(de)fining Innate Lymphocyte Lineages in the Face of Cancer

Chun Chou and Ming O. Li
DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-17-0440 Published April 2018

Abstract

Innate lymphocytes play critical roles in maintaining tissue homeostasis and integrity of the host at steady state and during pathogenic insults. The successive identification of new innate lymphocyte subsets has revealed an incredible diversity within the family. While this heterogeneous population can be grouped based on their cytotoxic potential into exclusively cytokine-producing helpers and cytolytic killers, the exact developmental relationships between the subsets are not fully understood. The former group is enriched at mucosal surfaces, whereas innate lymphocytes with cytotoxic potential can be identified in a wider array of tissues, including tumors. Although their cytotoxicity suggests an antitumor role, the nature of tumor-elicited innate lymphocyte responses has only begun to be investigated, and the identities of participating subsets still remain contentious. In this review, we provide a brief overview of innate lymphocyte biology, review the current knowledge on their ontogeny, and discuss their roles in tumor immunosurveillance. Cancer Immunol Res; 6(4); 372–7. ©2018 AACR.

Introduction

The vertebrate immune system has evolved to mount distinct responses tailored to different pathogenic insults. Intracellular pathogens, such as viruses and certain bacteria, and cellular transformation events endanger the integrity of host cells. Type 1 responses characterized by proinflammatory cytokine production and cytotoxicity protect from such challenges by limiting the growth of and directly killing infected or stressed cells. Extracellular threats, including some bacteria, fungi, and parasites, are often found at barrier sites and compete with the host for nutrients. Type 2 and 3 responses combat such challenges by mobilizing and coordinating multiple types of immune cells through cytokine production, cell–cell communication and recruitment.

Bidirectional communication between innate and adaptive immune cells initiates and orchestrates tailored immune responses. T lymphocytes, in particular, have been well characterized for their differentiation plasticity. Whereas CD8+ T cells mediate direct killing of target host cells, CD4+ T cells coordinate immune responses by differentiating into discrete subsets that produce distinct signature cytokines. Other lymphocytes that lack rearranged antigen-specific receptors have been identified and mirror T cells in their functional responses and differentiation requirements (1). These innate lymphocytes include the prototypic member, natural killer (NK) cells, and a diverse group of innate lymphoid cells (ILCs). NK cells are circulatory lymphocytes that directly kill target cells through the release of granzymes and perforin, thereby considered a counterpart to CD8+ T cells (2). In contrast, ILCs are rare in circulation or secondary lymphoid organs but exist in nonlymphoid tissues as tissue-resident cells (3). Based on their transcription factor–driven and functional identities, ILCs are grouped into three classes, ILC1, ILC2, and ILC3, that mirror the helper T-cell subsets (4).

Characteristics of Innate Lymphocytes

ILC1s and NK cells fall into the same group: type 1 innate lymphocytes. Both are characterized by the expression of the transcription factor T-bet; response to proinflammatory cytokines, interleukin (IL)-12 and IL18; and production of type 1 cytokines, including IFNγ and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα; ref. 5). In addition, both NK cells and ILC1s express an array of activating and inhibitory receptors that detect alterations in the identity and expression of major histocompatibility class I molecules (MHCI; refs. 6, 7). Through MHCI, intracellular information can be surveyed by the immune system. Viruses that downregulate MHCI to evade detection by CD8+ T cells render the infected host cells susceptible to killing by NK cells (6).

Cellular stress induces the expression of certain MHCI-like molecules that activate NK-cell activity (6). To what extent these NK receptors regulate ILC1 functions has not been extensively studied. In contrast to NK cells, which recirculate, ILC1s are tissue resident. Although the barrier functions of ILCs have been primarily studied at mucosal surfaces, nonmucosal organs also contain sizable ILC populations. These cells are important for tissue homeostasis, and dysregulation of their activities can result in immunopathology, such as kidney ischemia and obesity (8, 9).

Type 2 ILCs (ILC2) require the transcription factor Gata3 and Rora for development and the production of effector cytokines, IL5, 9, and 13 (10–12). ILC2s promote type 2 responses, which are important for eliminating helminth infections. Dysregulation of ILC2s can cause allergic inflammation, which are implicated in asthma, skin, and lung diseases (13).

Type 3 ILCs (ILC3) express the transcription factor RORγt (encoded by Rorc) and produce IL22 and IL17a (14). ILC3s are implicated in the maintenance of intestinal homeostasis by responding to tissue damage and alterations in microbiota, but can also play a pathogenic role in colitis (15). The lymphoid tissue inducer (LTi) cells are the prototypic member of the ILC3 family and are critical for lymphoid organogensis early in life through the expression of lymphotoxin (16). ILC2s and ILC3s are enriched at mucosal tissues, such as the intestines and lungs, whereas ILC1s are found in a wider range of tissues. Together, ILCs maintain tissue homeostasis and promote immune responses against pathogenic insults.

Innate Lymphocyte Development

Of the three classes of ILCs, ILC2s are the most homogeneous and have an identified committed progenitor in the bone marrow (17–19). ILC3s, although more heterogeneous than ILC2s, share a core signature gene expression program driven by RORγt (encoded by Rorc; ref. 7). A common progenitor for all ILCs has been identified as expressing both the transcription factor PLZF and the surface marker PD1 (18, 20). This population has lost LTi potential, suggesting that, although expressing RORγt, LTis are a distinct lineage of ILCs from ILC3s.

The ontogeny of group 1 innate lymphocytes, which include NK cells and ILC1s, is still highly contentious. Both cell types share many features that underlie their classification into group 1 innate lymphocytes. Although extensive gene expression profiling revealed only a small set of genes whose expression pattern can distinguish between NK cells and ILC1s (7), fate-mapping and adoptive transfer experiments conclusively demonstrated that NK cells and ILC1s are distinct lineages of lymphocytes (17, 20). Although both are derived from the common lymphoid progenitor (CLP) and downstream early innate lymphocyte progenitor (EILP; ref. 21), ILC1s develop from common helper innate lymphoid progenitors (CHILP; ref. 17), which have lost the potential to differentiate into NK cells. The identity of the NK cell–restricted progenitor in mouse is still unknown (Fig. 1). Although NK progenitors (NKP), including the pre-NKP and the refined NKPs (rNKP), can readily differentiate into NK1.1+NKp46+-expressing cells, whether this population still retains ILC1 potential is unclear.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Ontogeny of innate lymphocytes. The CLP gives rise to all lymphocyte lineages. Downstream of CLP, the EILP can develop into all innate lymphocyte lineages, but not T or B cells. Circulating NK cells develop from a yet to be identified NK-restricted progenitor (NKP) whereas tissue-resident innate lymphocytes are derived from PLZF+ ILCP, which do not have NK-cell potential. The PLZF+ population contains multipotent progenitors for all CD127hi helper ILCs. There also exists a group of tissue-resident CD127lo/− innate lymphocytes with cytolytic potential, although their lineage identity is not fully understood. This population of innate lymphocytes may be heterogeneous, receiving inputs from both the ILC lineage, as demonstrated for the ILC1ks in the liver, and trNK cells, via in situ differentiation from circulating mature NK cells. Alternatively, a yet to be identified progenitor downstream of EILPs may exist that specifically gives rise to ILC1ks, but not helper ILCs or NK cells. In the periphery, it also remains unknown whether ILC1hs can acquire cytotoxic potential.

Parabiosis experiments suggest that ILCs are tissue resident and seed the tissues early in life without much input from the circulation later (3). Although it remains possible that differentiated ILCs self-renew to maintain its population, it is also likely that multipotent ILC progenitors (ILCP) seed the tissue and differentiate to replenish the ILC compartment as the organism develops. The latter possibility has been implicated in humans. A tissue-residing ILCP has been identified that can give rise to cytotoxic innate lymphocytes and all ILCs in vitro and when adoptively transferred into lymphopoenic mice (22). These ILCPs can also be found in circulation (22), although to what extent the circulating ILCPs contribute to the maintenance of the ILC compartment is unclear. The mouse counterpart of the circulating ILCP in human has yet to be identified, but the ILC2 pool can be moderately replenished from circulation in response to N. brasiliensis infection. It remains unclear whether these newly recruited ILC2s developed from differentiated or multipotent progenitors from, if at all, the bone marrow (3).

Tissue-Resident Cytotoxic Innate Lymphocytes

The tissue-resident innate lymphocytes are a heterogeneous population that can be further delineated by the expression of CD127 (the IL7 receptor). CD127hi ILCs, found in the small intestine lamina propria, are noncytotoxic cytokine producers (7, 17), whereas the CD127lo/− innate lymphocytes, residing in the liver, salivary gland, mammary gland, and small intestine epithelium, express granzyme B as well as type 1 cytokines to various degrees (refs. 23–27; Fig. 1). Fate-mapping experiments using Rorc-Cre revealed that a substantial fraction of CD127hi ILC1s in the small intestine lamina propria are ex-RORγt-expressers, or ex-ILC3s (17). Conversely, RORγt− ILC1s can upregulate Rorc and produce ILC3-signature cytokines when cultured under polarizing conditions as shown ex vivo with human ILCs or under adoptive transfer settings in mice (21, 28, 29). Thus, the functional plasticity of ILC1/3s is reminiscent of the TH1/TH17 interconversion in the gut and during autoimmune neuroinflammation. Notably, among the Rorc-Cre fate-mapped ILCs in the small intestine lamina propria, the vast majority are in fact CD127hi, indicating that high CD127 expression marks a subset of noncytotoxic cytokine-producing ILC1s that can interconvert with ILC3s (ref. 17; Fig. 1). These CD127hi ILC1s with exclusively helper functions are hereafter designated ILC1h.

In the liver, the CD127lo/− type 1 innate lymphocytes can be further subdivided based on the expression of two integrin molecules, CD49a and CD49b. The tissue-resident CD49a+ population expresses substantially more granzymes than the circulating CD49b+ conventional NK cells (7). These CD49a+CD127lo/− type 1 innate lymphocytes have been formerly named tissue-resident NK (trNK; ref. 25). However, recent evidence points to their closer relationship to ILC1s than NK, based on their developmental requirements. Genetic studies showed that NK cells strictly require the transcription factor Nfil3 and Eomes for development and maintenance, whereas CD127hi ILC1s are unaffected by Eomes deficiency (25, 30). The liver-resident CD49a+CD127lo/− innate lymphocytes develop independently of Nfil3 and Eomes, supporting their closer lineage relationship to ILCs than NK cells (25, 30). In addition, CD49a+CD127lo/− innate lymphocytes appear to share a similar progenitor with all other ILCs, collectively named CHILP (17). A fraction of CHILP highly expresses PLZF and PD1 and retains potential for all CD127hi ILCs, but not LTis. These cells can also give rise to liver-resident innate lymphocytes at a much higher frequency than giving rise to conventional NK cells in both adoptive transfer settings and during the steady state (18, 20). Although by this criteria, the vast majority of liver CD49a+ innate lymphocytes are ILC1s, whether circulating NK cells can also upregulate CD49a, downregulate Eomes, and acquire a tissue-resident program is still unknown. Before such a possibility is ruled out, for instance, with cell fate tracing experiments, the term “trNK” is better kept to distinguish this NK-derived population from CHILP-derived PLZFCre fate-mapped ILC1s (Fig. 1).

All CD127hi helper ILCs require the transcription factor Gata3 for development (31). However, liver ILC1s, commonly deemed as the prototypical helper ILC1s, are unaffected by Gata3 deficiency (25). A striking parallel is seen during thymocyte development, in which deletion of Gata3 at the double-positive stage results in the specific loss of CD4+, but not CD8+, mature thymocytes (32, 33), suggesting that the Gata3-dependent specification of the helper program may be a common theme in lymphocyte development. Although the exact developmental stage at which Gata3 acts to specify helper ILC differentiation is still unknown, current data suggest a dichotomy of tissue-resident type 1 innate lymphocytes into Gata3-dependent exclusive cytokine producers, or helper CD127hi ILC1s (ILC1hs) as typified in the intestine, and Gata3-independent cytotoxic killer CD127lo/− ILC1s (ILC1ks), first identified in the liver. Although both develop from the PLZF+ fraction of CHILP, it remains possible that the PLZF+ population is heterogeneous and contains distinct progenitors for ILC1hs and ILC1ks. Alternatively, the two types of ILC1s may share a common progenitor and the fate choice may diverge later in a Gata3-dependent manner. It is also possible that a yet to be identified non-NK, nonhelper ILCP downstream of EILP specifically gives rise to ILC1ks. Whether ILC1hs can gain cytotoxic potential and contribute to the ILC1k pool in the periphery is unclear either (Fig. 1). Human intestinal CD127hi, but not CD103+CD127lo/−, ILC1s can differentiate into ILC3s (29), suggesting against the possibility of peripheral conversion from ILC1h to ILC1k. Whether the lack of plasticity is a general feature for mouse ILC1hs and ILC1ks needs more rigorous testing.

Tumor-Infiltrating Innate Lymphocytes

Tumors present a challenge to the immune system, because tolerance mechanisms constitutively curb immune responses against self. Effective antitumor immune responses require the immune system to detect and destroy self-derived cancer cells. Although high mutation loads in tumors generate immunogenic neoepitopes rendering transformed cells susceptible to recognition and destruction by the adaptive immune system, not all tumors carry such mutations (34, 35). Early-stage precancerous lesions in particular may not harbor many mutations, making their detection by the adaptive immune system difficult. Tumors with loss-of-function mutations in antigen presentation pathways are invisible to conventional cytotoxic T cells, even if they harbor neoepitopes (36). Thus, the adaptive immune system may miss early transformation events, and neoepitope-dependent antitumor responses by adaptive lymphocytes are ineffective against tumors with low somatic mutations. Indeed, in a spontaneous oncogene-driven breast tumor model, CD8+ T cells fail to restrain early tumor growth. Rather, innate lymphocytes appear to be essential for early tumor immunosurveillance (26). In other tumor models, depletion of NK1.1+ cells accelerated tumor growth (37–39), further supporting an antitumor role of group 1 innate lymphocytes. Thus, group 1 innate lymphocytes utilize a nonredundant immunosurveillance mechanism.

Although NK1.1+ innate lymphocytes in the tumors are implicated as the major contributors to antitumor immunity, the ontogeny of these cells is still unresolved. In the PyMT-driven breast tumor model, all NK1.1+ innate lymphocytes are CD127−, and can be further divided into two populations, based on the expression of the two integrins, CD49a and CD49b. The CD49a−CD49b+ subset among the NK1.1+ innate lymphocytes are conventional NK cells as they recirculate and are strictly dependent on Nfil3 (26). In contrast, the CD49a+CD49b+/− NK1.1+ innate lymphocytes are tissue resident and only moderately reduced in Nfil3-deficient mice (26). Furthermore, the core ILC1 gene expression signature defined by liver-resident CD49a+ NK1.1+ innate lymphocytes is also shared by intratumoral CD49a+ NK1.1+ innate lymphocytes (26). These data collectively suggest that tumor-infiltrating CD49a+ NK1.1+ innate lymphocytes resemble the CD49a+ NK1.1+ cytotoxic innate lymphocytes in the liver and salivary glands, thus designated ILC1-like cells. Whether these tumor-infiltrating ILC1-like cells are also Gata3 independent, like the liver ILC1ks, remains to be tested. Although both NK cells and ILC1-like cells are cytotoxic, ILC1-like cells, but not NK cells, acquire the integrin CD103 whose ligand, E-cadherin, is abundantly expressed by tumor cells (26). CD103 assists in granule positioning and release during tumor cell lysis (40). These results suggest that although both tumor-infiltrating NK cells and ILC1-like cells can kill transformed targets, they mediate cancer immunosurveillance through distinct mechanisms.

In the PyMT-driven breast tumor model, IL15-deficient animals showed accelerated tumor growth at a time point earlier than mice lacking CD8+ T cells (26), suggesting a contribution from NK1.1+ lymphocytes, but not CD8+ T cells for restraining early tumor growth. Notably, mice deficient for Nfil3, despite lacking conventional NK cells, did not show accelerated tumor growth, implying a dominant role of ILC1-like cells, rather than conventional NK cells, in mediating early tumor immunosurveillance (26). This indirect evidence would be aided by more genetic tools that specifically target NK cells or ILC1-like cells, to finely tease out their relative contribution to antitumor immunity.

Besides oncogene-driven cancer models, type 1 innate lymphocytes are also reported in transplantable tumor models (41–43). A population of CD127−CD49a+ NK1.1+ innate lymphocytes was found in tumor explants and carcinogen-induced sarcoma. The majority of them coexpress CD49b and Eomes, phenotypically resembling the ILC1-like cells found in breast tumors and salivary gland (41). The study proposed that these tumor-infiltrating and liver CD49a+NK1.1+ innate lymphocytes are converted from circulating conventional NK cells by tissue-derived signals, such as IL15 and TGFβ, based on adoptive transfer experiments (41). However, adoptive transfer experiments of CHILP already definitively demonstrated that conventional NK cells and all CD127+ ILCs, as well as liver ILC1-like cells, develop from distinct progenitors, making NK to ILC conversion at the steady state an unlikely event (17, 20).

The apparent discrepancy between the report by Gao and colleagues and the current paradigm highlights an outstanding problem in the field, namely, the lack of lineage-defining markers for NK cells and ILC1s. Eomes expression is widely accepted as a convenient marker to distinguish NK cells from ILC1-like cells in the liver, but such a distinction is difficult to draw when one looks beyond the liver. In the salivary gland and PyMT-driven tumors, both CD49a+ non-NK ILC1-like cells and NK cells express Eomes. Hence, Eomes expression alone does not exclusively define the NK lineage. Eomes expression can be suppressed by TGFβ signals (23), so ILC1s cannot be reliably defined by the lack of Eomes expression. Taken together, these data present an alternative interpretation of the results by Gao and colleagues: NK cells adopt ILC1-like phenotypes rather than transdifferentiate into ILC1s under certain conditions, particularly during lymphopenia with a rich cytokine environment. Indeed, active IL15 and TGFβ signaling promote CD49a and CD103 expression by NK cells (23, 41). Although these findings failed to resolve the lineage relationships between NK cells and ILC1-like cells, they nevertheless raise the possibility that the tissue-resident CD49a+ ILC1-like population in breast tumor models may be heterogeneous with some contribution from conventional NK cells. Further fate-mapping experiments are needed to address this hypothesis.

Whether innate lymphocytes assume a pro- or anticancer function varies between tumor models. In patients with high-grade serous cancer, the presence of CD56+ type 1 innate lymphocytes is associated with suppressed T cell responses, implying an immunomodulatory role (44). Altered expression or mutations in NK activating receptors on type 1 innate lymphocytes have also been reported to correlate with increased metastasis and progressive tumor development (45–47), although whether defective innate lymphocyte responses are the causes of tumor progression remains to be tested. In mouse models, although conventional NK cells are dispensable for constraining PyMT-driven tumor growth, they exhibited some antitumor effects in transplantable or carcinogen-induced cancer models. This discrepancy is likely caused by the natural distribution of resident ILC1-like cells in breast tissues. Their proximity to transformation events and increased cytotoxic potential allows them to survey the epithelium more efficiently than do NK cells. In contrast, tumor explants acutely disrupt the tissue structure and their aggressive growth may not allow enough time for a resident ILC population to codevelop. Thus, this paucity of surveillance by cytotoxic lymphocytes necessitates strong NK cell responses to mediate early control of tumor growth in transplantable tumor models. Carcinogen-induced sarcomas are enriched for neoepitopes and elicit a strong adaptive immune response. NK cells may in this case mediate antibody-dependent cytotoxicity through their Fc receptors binding to antibodies deposited on tumor cells.

Concluding Remarks

As one of the latest additions to the lymphocyte family, the discovery of ILCs provided valuable insights into how lymphocytes evolved and, at the same time, prompted a reevaluation of lymphocyte-mediated immune responses. Although cytotoxic innate lymphocytes have been implicated in antitumor immunity, the precise ontogeny of these cells is still unresolved. Although identification of a committed ILCP excludes the interconversion between NK cells and CD127+ ILC1hs or liver ILC1ks, direct evidence that ILC1-like cells in other tissues represent a distinct lineage from NK cells is still lacking. Although it is comforting that various human tumors elicited cytotoxic innate lymphocyte responses similar to those reported in murine models, the precise origin of these CD56-expressing cells is all the more confusing. Given the important yet controversial role of cytotoxic innate lymphocytes in tumors, understanding the ontogeny of these cells may allow for novel therapeutic opportunities aimed at manipulating their activity to restrain tumor growth.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design: C. Chou, M.O. Li

Development of methodology: C. Chou

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): C. Chou

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): C. Chou

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: C. Chou, M.O. Li

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01 CA198280-01 to M.O. Li), the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (Faculty Scholar Award to M.O. Li), and the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Support Grant/Core Grant (P30 CA008748). C. Chou is a Cancer Research Institute Irvington Fellow supported by the Cancer Research Institute.

We thank Briana G. Nixon and Emily R. Kansler for valuable discussions and critical reading of the manuscript.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Spits H,
    2. Artis D,
    3. Colonna M,
    4. Diefenbach A,
    5. Di Santo JP,
    6. Eberl G,
    7. et al.
    Innate lymphoid cells—a proposal for uniform nomenclature. Nat Rev Immunol 2013;13:145–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Sun JC,
    2. Lanier LL
    . NK cell development, homeostasis and function: parallels with CD8(+) T cells. Nat Rev Immunol 2011;11:645–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Gasteiger G,
    2. Fan XY,
    3. Dikiy S,
    4. Lee SY,
    5. Rudensky AY
    . Tissue residency of innate lymphoid cells in lymphoid and nonlymphoid organs. Science 2015;350:981–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Shih HY,
    2. Sciume G,
    3. Poholek AC,
    4. Vahedi G,
    5. Hirahara K,
    6. Villarino AV,
    7. et al.
    Transcriptional and epigenetic networks of helper T and innate lymphoid cells. Immunol Rev 2014;261:23–49.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Daussy C,
    2. Faure F,
    3. Mayol K,
    4. Viel S,
    5. Gasteiger G,
    6. Charrier E,
    7. et al.
    T-bet and Eomes instruct the development of two distinct natural killer cell lineages in the liver and in the bone marrow. J Exp Med 2014;211:563–77.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Pegram HJ,
    2. Andrews DM,
    3. Smyth MJ,
    4. Darcy PK,
    5. Kershaw MH
    . Activating and inhibitory receptors of natural killer cells. Immunol Cell Biol 2011;89:216–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Robinette ML,
    2. Fuchs A,
    3. Cortez VS,
    4. Lee JS,
    5. Wang YM,
    6. Durum SK,
    7. et al.
    Transcriptional programs define molecular characteristics of innate lymphoid cell classes and subsets. Nat Immunol 2015;16:306–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Victorino F,
    2. Sojka DK,
    3. Brodsky KS,
    4. McNamee EN,
    5. Masterson JC,
    6. Homann D,
    7. et al.
    Tissue-resident NK cells mediate ischemic kidney injury and are not depleted by anti-asialo-GM1 antibody. J Immunol 2015;195:4973–85.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. O'Sullivan TE,
    2. Rapp M,
    3. Fan X,
    4. Weizman OE,
    5. Bhardwaj P,
    6. Adams NM,
    7. et al.
    Adipose-resident group 1 innate lymphoid cells promote obesity-associated insulin resistance. Immunity 2016;45:428–41.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Moro K,
    2. Koyasu S
    . Innate production of Th2 cytokines by adipose tissue-associated c-Kit(+)Sca-1(+) lymphoid cells. Nature 2010;463:540–544.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Neill DR,
    2. Wong SH,
    3. Bellosi A,
    4. Flynn RJ,
    5. Daly M,
    6. Langford TKA,
    7. et al.
    Nuocytes represent a new innate effector leukocyte that mediates type-2 immunity. Nature 2010;464:1367–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Price AE,
    2. Liang HE,
    3. Sullivan BM,
    4. Reinhardt RL,
    5. Eisley CJ,
    6. Erle DJ,
    7. et al.
    Systemically dispersed innate IL-13-expressing cells in type 2 immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:11489–94.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Barlow JL,
    2. McKenzie ANJ
    . Type-2 innate lymphoid cells in human allergic disease. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2014;14:397–403.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Rankin LC,
    2. Girard-Madoux MJH,
    3. Seillet C,
    4. Mielke LA,
    5. Kerdiles Y,
    6. Fenis A,
    7. et al.
    Complementarity and redundancy of IL-22-producing innate lymphoid cells. Nat Immunol 2016;17:179–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Klose CSN,
    2. Artis D
    . Innate lymphoid cells as regulators of immunity, inflammation and tissue homeostasis. Nat Immunol 2016;17:765–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. van de Pavert SA,
    2. Mebius RE
    . New insights into the development of lymphoid tissues. Nat Rev Immunol 2010;10:664–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Klose CSN,
    2. Flach M,
    3. Mohle L,
    4. Rogell L,
    5. Hoyler T,
    6. Ebert K,
    7. et al.
    Differentiation of type 1 ILCs from a common progenitor to all helper-like innate lymphoid cell lineages. Cell 2014;157:340–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Yu Y,
    2. Tsang JCH,
    3. Wang C,
    4. Clare S,
    5. Wang JX,
    6. Chen X,
    7. et al.
    Single-cell RNA-seq identifies a PD-1(hi) ILC progenitor and defines its development pathway. Nature 2016;539:102–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Hoyler T,
    2. Klose CS,
    3. Souabni A,
    4. Turqueti-Neves A,
    5. Pfeifer D,
    6. Rawlins EL,
    7. et al.
    The transcription factor GATA-3 controls cell fate and maintenance of type 2 innate lymphoid cells. Immunity 2012;37:634–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Constantinides MG,
    2. McDonald BD,
    3. Verhoef PA,
    4. Bendelac A
    . A committed precursor to innate lymphoid cells. Nature 2014;508:397–401.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Yang Q,
    2. Li FY,
    3. Harly C,
    4. Xing SJ,
    5. Ye LY,
    6. Xia XF,
    7. et al.
    TCF-1 upregulation identifies early innate lymphoid progenitors in the bone marrow. Nat Immunol 2015;16:1044–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Lim AI,
    2. Li Y,
    3. Lopez-Lastra S,
    4. Stadhouders R,
    5. Paul F,
    6. Casrouge A,
    7. et al.
    Systemic human ILC precursors provide a substrate for tissue ILC differentiation. Cell 2017;168:1086–100.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23.↵
    1. Cortez VS,
    2. Cervantes-Barragan L,
    3. Robinette ML,
    4. Bando JK,
    5. Wang Y,
    6. Geiger TL,
    7. et al.
    Transforming growth factor-beta signaling guides the differentiation of innate lymphoid cells in salivary glands. Immunity 2016;44:1127–39.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Cortez VS,
    2. Fuchs A,
    3. Cella M,
    4. Gilfillan S,
    5. Colonna M
    . Cutting edge: salivary gland NK cells develop independently of Nfil3 in steady-state. J Immunol 2014;192:4487–91.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Sojka DK,
    2. Plougastel-Douglas B,
    3. Yang LP,
    4. Pak-Wittel MA,
    5. Artyomov MN,
    6. Ivanova Y,
    7. et al.
    Tissue-resident natural killer (NK) cells are cell lineages distinct from thymic and conventional splenic NK cells. Elife 2014;3:e01659.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Dadi S,
    2. Chhangawala S,
    3. Whitlock BM,
    4. Franklin RA,
    5. Luo CT,
    6. Oh SA,
    7. et al.
    Cancer immunosurveillance by tissue-resident innate lymphoid cells and innate-like T cells. Cell 2016;164:365–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Fuchs A,
    2. Vermi W,
    3. Lee JS,
    4. Lonardi S,
    5. Gilfillan S,
    6. Newberry RD,
    7. et al.
    Intraepithelial type 1 innate lymphoid cells are a unique subset of IL-12-and IL-15-responsive IFN-gamma-producing cells. Immunity 2013;38:769–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Vonarbourg C,
    2. Mortha A,
    3. Bui VL,
    4. Hernandez PP,
    5. Kiss EA,
    6. Hoyler T,
    7. et al.
    Regulated expression of nuclear receptor ROR gamma t confers distinct functional fates to NK cell receptor-expressing ROR gamma t(+) innate lymphocytes. Immunity 2010;33:736–51.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Bernink JH,
    2. Krabbendam L,
    3. Germar K,
    4. de Jong E,
    5. Gronke K,
    6. Kofoed-Nielsen M,
    7. et al.
    Interleukin-12 and-23 control plasticity of CD127(+) group 1 and group 3 innate lymphoid cells in the intestinal lamina propria. Immunity 2015;43:146–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Pikovskaya O,
    2. Chaix J,
    3. Rothman NJ,
    4. Collins A,
    5. Chen YH,
    6. Scipioni AM,
    7. et al.
    Cutting edge: eomesodermin is sufficient to direct type 1 innate lymphocyte development into the conventional NK lineage. J Immunol 2016;196:1449–54.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Yagi R,
    2. Zhong C,
    3. Northrup DL,
    4. Yu F,
    5. Bouladoux N,
    6. Spencer S,
    7. et al.
    The transcription factor GATA3 is critical for the development of all IL-7Ralpha-expressing innate lymphoid cells. Immunity 2014;40:378–88.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Wang L,
    2. Wildt KF,
    3. Zhu J,
    4. Zhang X,
    5. Feigenbaum L,
    6. Tessarollo L,
    7. et al.
    Distinct functions for the transcription factors GATA-3 and ThPOK during intrathymic differentiation of CD4(+) T cells. Nat Immunol 2008;9:1122–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Pai SY,
    2. Truitt ML,
    3. Ting CN,
    4. Leiden JM,
    5. Glimcher LH,
    6. Ho IC
    . Critical roles for transcription factor GATA-3 in thymocyte development. Immunity 2003;19:863–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Koebel CM,
    2. Vermi W,
    3. Swann JB,
    4. Zerafa N,
    5. Rodig SJ,
    6. Old LJ,
    7. et al.
    Adaptive immunity maintains occult cancer in an equilibrium state. Nature 2007;450:903–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Matsushita H,
    2. Vesely MD,
    3. Koboldt DC,
    4. Rickert CG,
    5. Uppaluri R,
    6. Magrini VJ,
    7. et al.
    Cancer exome analysis reveals a T-cell-dependent mechanism of cancer immunoediting. Nature 2012;482:400–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Garrido F,
    2. Aptsiauri N,
    3. Doorduijn EM,
    4. Lora AMG,
    5. van Hall T
    . The urgent need to recover MHC class I in cancers for effective immunotherapy. Curr Opin Immunol 2016;39:44–51.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Smyth MJ,
    2. Thia KYT,
    3. Street SEA,
    4. Cretney E,
    5. Trapani JA,
    6. Taniguchi M,
    7. et al.
    Differential tumor surveillance by natural killer (NK) and NKT cells. J Exp Med 2000;191:661–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Smyth MJ
    . NK cells and NKT cells collaborate in host protection from methylcholanthrene-induced fibrosarcoma. Int Immunol 2008;20:631.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Smyth MJ,
    2. Crowe NY,
    3. Godfrey DI
    . NK cells and NKT cells collaborate in host protection from methylcholanthrene-induced fibrosarcoma. Int Immunol 2001;13:459–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Le Floc'h A,
    2. Jalil A,
    3. Franciszkiewicz K,
    4. Validire P,
    5. Vergnon I,
    6. Mami-Chouaib F
    . Minimal engagement of CD103 on cytotoxic T lymphocytes with an E-Cadherin-Fc molecule triggers lytic granule polarization via a phospholipase C gamma-dependent pathway. Cancer Res 2011;71:328–38.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Gao Y,
    2. Souza-Fonseca-Guimaraes F,
    3. Bald T,
    4. Ng SS,
    5. Young A,
    6. Ngiow SF,
    7. et al.
    Tumor immunoevasion by the conversion of effector NK cells into type 1 innate lymphoid cells. Nat Immunol 2017;18:1004–15.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Cortez VS,
    2. Ulland TK,
    3. Cervantes-Barragan L,
    4. Bando JK,
    5. Robinette ML,
    6. Wang Q,
    7. et al.
    SMAD4 impedes the conversion of NK cells into ILC1-like cells by curtailing non-canonical TGF-beta signaling. Nat Immunol 2017;18:995–1003.
    OpenUrl
  43. 43.↵
    1. Morvan MG,
    2. Lanier LL
    . NK cells and cancer: you can teach innate cells new tricks. Nat Rev Cancer 2016;16:7–19.
    OpenUrl
  44. 44.↵
    1. Crome SQ,
    2. Nguyen LT,
    3. Lopez-Verges S,
    4. Yang SY,
    5. Martin B,
    6. Yam JY,
    7. et al.
    A distinct innate lymphoid cell population regulates tumor-associated T cells. Nat Med 2017;23:368–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  45. 45.↵
    1. Konjevic G,
    2. Mirjacic Martinovic K,
    3. Vuletic A,
    4. Jovic V,
    5. Jurisic V,
    6. Babovic N,
    7. et al.
    Low expression of CD161 and NKG2D activating NK receptor is associated with impaired NK cell cytotoxicity in metastatic melanoma patients. Clin Exp Metastasis 2007;24:1–11.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. El-Sherbiny YM,
    2. Meade JL,
    3. Holmes TD,
    4. McGonagle D,
    5. Mackie SL,
    6. Morgan AW,
    7. et al.
    The requirement for DNAM-1, NKG2D, and NKp46 in the natural killer cell-mediated killing of myeloma cells. Cancer Res 2007;67:8444–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    1. Costello RT,
    2. Sivori S,
    3. Marcenaro E,
    4. Lafage-Pochitaloff M,
    5. Mozziconacci MJ,
    6. Reviron D,
    7. et al.
    Defective expression and function of natural killer cell-triggering receptors in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2002;99:3661–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Back to top
View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Re(de)fining Innate Lymphocyte Lineages in the Face of Cancer
Chun Chou and Ming O. Li
Cancer Immunol Res April 1 2018 (6) (4) 372-377; DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-17-0440
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Advertisement