Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Cancer Immunology Essentials
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Toolbox: Coding and Computation
      • Toolbox: Signatures and Cells
      • "Best of" Collection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Immunology Research
Cancer Immunology Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Cancer Immunology Essentials
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Toolbox: Coding and Computation
      • Toolbox: Signatures and Cells
      • "Best of" Collection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Research Articles

GITR Agonism Enhances Cellular Metabolism to Support CD8+ T-cell Proliferation and Effector Cytokine Production in a Mouse Tumor Model

Simran S. Sabharwal, David B. Rosen, Jeff Grein, Dana Tedesco, Barbara Joyce-Shaikh, Roanna Ueda, Marie Semana, Michele Bauer, Kathy Bang, Christopher Stevenson, Daniel J. Cua and Luis A. Zúñiga
Simran S. Sabharwal
1Merck & Co., Inc., Palo Alto, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David B. Rosen
1Merck & Co., Inc., Palo Alto, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeff Grein
1Merck & Co., Inc., Palo Alto, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dana Tedesco
1Merck & Co., Inc., Palo Alto, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barbara Joyce-Shaikh
1Merck & Co., Inc., Palo Alto, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roanna Ueda
1Merck & Co., Inc., Palo Alto, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marie Semana
2Charles River Laboratories, Insourcing Solutions, Palo Alto, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michele Bauer
2Charles River Laboratories, Insourcing Solutions, Palo Alto, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathy Bang
2Charles River Laboratories, Insourcing Solutions, Palo Alto, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher Stevenson
2Charles River Laboratories, Insourcing Solutions, Palo Alto, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel J. Cua
1Merck & Co., Inc., Palo Alto, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luis A. Zúñiga
1Merck & Co., Inc., Palo Alto, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: luis.zuniga@merck.com
DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-17-0632 Published October 2018
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Costimulation with the mouse GITR agonist antibody, DTA-1, enhances activation and metabolism in CD8+ T cells stimulated with low-dose anti-CD3. A, Representative CellTrace Violet FACS plots of IgG2a control versus DTA-1–treated CD8+ T cells 3 days after activation. B, Proliferation results of 4 independent experiments. Oxygen consumption rate (OCR; C) and glycolytic rate [extracellular acidification rate (ECAR)] (D); N = 3. E, Uptake of the fluorescent glucose analogue 2-NBDG at 72 Hours; N = 5. F, ELISA results for interferon γ (IFNγ) levels; N = 3. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. *, P ≤ 0.05 using Student t test.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Mouse anti-GITR agonism by DTA-1 enhances CD8+ T-cell activation and metabolism despite optimal anti-CD3/anti-CD28 stimulation. A, Cell size and (B) viability in IgG2a control versus DTA-1–treated CD8+ T cells; N = 3. C, FACS plots of activation markers. D, ELISA IFNγ concentrations; N = 3. E, Representative NF-κB pathway Western blots from two separate experiments. F, NF-κB pathway gene expression; N = 3; ns, not significant. G, ECAR (first two panels) and OCR at baseline and after addition of 100 μmol/L etomoxir (last two panels). H, 2-NBDG uptake, intracellular lipid droplet staining by BODIPY, and C12 and C16 fatty acid uptake. I, Gene-expression heat map depicting DTA-1 regulation of proliferation and activation-associated genes and (J) metabolic gene transcripts. Individual color blocks represent an average of normalized gene expression from 3 individual experiments. FACS plots are representative of at least three individual experiments. Data are shown as mean ± SD. *, P ≤ 0.05 using Student t test for comparing two groups or ANOVA for multiple groups.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    DTA-1–induced cellular proliferation requires increased glycolytic and mitochondrial metabolism, whereas increased IFNγ is glycolysis dependent. A, OCR, (B) ECAR, and (C) 2-NBDG uptake of cells treated with Veh, 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG), or etomoxir (Eto). D, Proliferating cells were gated into cells undergoing 1–3 cell divisions or 4+ cell divisions. Graph represents N = 3 for 2-DG and N = 4 for other groups. E, IFNγ ELISA levels for 2-DG and Eto-treated cells. Cells treated with the ATP synthase inhibitor oligomycin (Oligo) and their (F) OCR, (G) ECAR, (H) 2-NBDG uptake, (I) percent proliferating cells, and (J) IFNγ concentration. K, Representative plot of cellular proliferation with cells treated with Veh and oligo. N = 3 for oligo experiments. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.05 compared with all other IgG2a treatment groups; ‡, P ≤ 0.05 compared with all other DTA-1 treatment groups, as measured by ANOVA; ns, not significant.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    DTA-1 upregulates MAPK signaling and can rescue CD8+ T cells from MEK inhibition, in part due to increased PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling. A, Representative MAPK pathway Western blots from two separate experiments. B, OCR, (C) ECAR, and (D) 2-NBDG uptake of cells incubated with DMSO vehicle (Veh), the p38 inhibitor SB203580 (SB), or the MEK inhibitor PD98059 (PD). E, p70S6k Western blot representative of two experiments. F, 2-NBDG uptake (N = 3), (G) basal OCR (N = 4), and (H) basal ECAR (N = 4) of cells incubated with Veh, PD, the PI3Kδ inhibitor SW30 (SW), or the PD/SW combination (Com). I, CellTrace plots representative of three separate experiments. J, IFNγ levels (left; multiple t tests using Holm–Sidak method). The large difference in concentrations between control and treatment groups required the log transformation of data to compare results between treatment groups (right, N = 3). For F, average percent change is depicted in red. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.05 compared with all other IgG2a treatment groups; ‡, P ≤ 0.05 compared with all other DTA-1 treatment groups, as measured by ANOVA; ns, not significant.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Checkpoint blockade therapy and anti-GITR therapy combine to overcome inhibition of CD8+ T-cell activation by PD-L1 signaling in vitro. A, Cell viability at 72 Hours. *, P ≤ 0.05 versus all other groups via ANOVA. **, P ≤ 0.05 versus all other PD-L1–inhibited groups via ANOVA. B, OCR and C, ECAR, in CD8+ T cells, 4 technical replicates representative of N = 3 separate experiments. D, 2-NBDG uptake and (E) cellular proliferation of PD-L1–inhibited CD8+ T cells; representative of N = 3. F, IFNγ concentrations by ELISA; N = 5 individual experiments. Data are shown as mean ± SD. *, P ≤ 0.05 by ANOVA.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    DTA-1 treatment in a syngeneic mouse tumor model enhances CD8+ T-cell activation and proliferation in vivo. A, Tumor mass and (B) DLN mass on day 8 after treatment; individual masses from N = 4 separate experiments (8–13 mice per experiment), *, P ≤ 0.05 by Student t test. C, Gene-expression heat map depicting DTA-1 regulation of proliferation-associated genes in DLN. Individual color blocks represent an average of normalized gene expression from 4 individual experiments. D, Granzyme and IFNγ gene transcript levels; *, P ≤ 0.05 by ANOVA. F, Klrg1 gene transcript levels; N = 4; *, P ≤ 0.05 by Student t test. E, Effector/memory staining from DLN. Representative plot from N = 4 separate experiments. Data are shown as mean ± SD.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    GITR agonism increases metabolism in CD8+ T cells in the DLN and tumor of MC38-bearing mice. A, OCR and (B) ECAR in DLN (N = 4), and TIL (C and D, respectively; N = 3) CD8+ T cells. E, TIL spare glycolytic reserve (basal ECAR minus oligomycin-treated ECAR). F, Gene expression of TIL CD8+ metabolic genes. G, BODIPY staining. Data shown are mean ± SD. *, P ≤ 0.05 by Student t test; ns, not significant.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplementary Data

    • Supplementary Figure Legends - Legends for the 3 Supplementary Figure Legends
    • Figure S1 - Metabolic Inhibitors
    • Figure S2 - MEK/PI3K Data
    • Figure S3 - PhosFlow and Ki67 data
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Immunology Research: 6 (10)
October 2018
Volume 6, Issue 10
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Editorial Board (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Immunology Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
GITR Agonism Enhances Cellular Metabolism to Support CD8+ T-cell Proliferation and Effector Cytokine Production in a Mouse Tumor Model
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Immunology Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Immunology Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
GITR Agonism Enhances Cellular Metabolism to Support CD8+ T-cell Proliferation and Effector Cytokine Production in a Mouse Tumor Model
Simran S. Sabharwal, David B. Rosen, Jeff Grein, Dana Tedesco, Barbara Joyce-Shaikh, Roanna Ueda, Marie Semana, Michele Bauer, Kathy Bang, Christopher Stevenson, Daniel J. Cua and Luis A. Zúñiga
Cancer Immunol Res October 1 2018 (6) (10) 1199-1211; DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-17-0632

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
GITR Agonism Enhances Cellular Metabolism to Support CD8+ T-cell Proliferation and Effector Cytokine Production in a Mouse Tumor Model
Simran S. Sabharwal, David B. Rosen, Jeff Grein, Dana Tedesco, Barbara Joyce-Shaikh, Roanna Ueda, Marie Semana, Michele Bauer, Kathy Bang, Christopher Stevenson, Daniel J. Cua and Luis A. Zúñiga
Cancer Immunol Res October 1 2018 (6) (10) 1199-1211; DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-17-0632
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Nutlin-3a: An Immune-Checkpoint Activator for NK Cells in Neuroblastoma
  • Therapy to Engage, Expand, and Enable Antitumor Responses
  • Dietary Fructose Promotes Resistance to Cancer Immunotherapy
Show more Research Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Cancer Immunology Essentials

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Immunology Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Immunology Research
eISSN: 2326-6074
ISSN: 2326-6066

Advertisement