Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Cancer Immunology Essentials
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Toolbox: Coding and Computation
      • Toolbox: Signatures and Cells
      • "Best of" Collection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Immunology Research
Cancer Immunology Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Cancer Immunology Essentials
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Toolbox: Coding and Computation
      • Toolbox: Signatures and Cells
      • "Best of" Collection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Research Articles

Expanded CD56superbrightCD16+ NK Cells from Ovarian Cancer Patients Are Cytotoxic against Autologous Tumor in a Patient-Derived Xenograft Murine Model

Sophie M. Poznanski, Tina Nham, Marianne V. Chew, Amanda J. Lee, Joanne A. Hammill, Isabella Y. Fan, Martin Butcher, Jonathan L. Bramson, Dean A. Lee, Hal W. Hirte and Ali A. Ashkar
Sophie M. Poznanski
1Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster Immunology Research Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tina Nham
1Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster Immunology Research Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marianne V. Chew
1Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster Immunology Research Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amanda J. Lee
1Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster Immunology Research Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Amanda J. Lee
Joanne A. Hammill
1Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster Immunology Research Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Isabella Y. Fan
1Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster Immunology Research Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Butcher
2Juravinski Cancer Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathan L. Bramson
1Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster Immunology Research Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jonathan L. Bramson
Dean A. Lee
3The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Dean A. Lee
Hal W. Hirte
4Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ali A. Ashkar
1Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster Immunology Research Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ashkara@mcmaster.ca
DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0144 Published October 2018
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Ex vivo K562-mb-IL21–expanded NK cells are a CD56superbrightCD16+-activated subset with greater antitumor functions compared with IL2-activated NK cells. Expanded and unexpanded NK cells were activated overnight with IL2 (100 U/mL). A, Percentage of IFNγ expression was compared (n = 6 donors per group). B, NK cell percent specific lysis of OVCAR8 target cells following 5-hour incubation at a 5:1 effector-to-target ratio (unexpanded group n = 5; expanded group n = 6). C, Representative flow plots and (D) MFI of CD56 expression (n = 6 donors per group). E, Proportion of CD56brightCD16+ cells of total NK cell populations (n = 5 donors per group). F–O, Expanded NK cell population was stratified by flow cytometry analysis based on CD56 expression. Percent expression of activation receptors (F) CD16 (n = 5 donors), (G) CD69, (H) NKG2D, (I) NKp30, (J) NKp44, (K) NKp46, and inhibitory receptors (L) NKG2A, (M) CD158a, (N) CD158b, and (O) CD158e1 was compared (G–O: n = 3 donors). A–F, Results from two independent experiments. G–O, Results from one experiment. A–E were analyzed via an unpaired t test. F–O were analyzed via matched one-way ANOVA. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Antitumor functions of expanded NK cells increase with increasing CD56 brightness. Expanded NK cell population was stratified by flow cytometry analysis based on CD56 expression intensity. A, Percent (n = 6 donors), (B) MFI (n = 6 donors), and (C) representative flow plots of IFNγ expression. D, Expanded NK cell percent CD107a expression following 5-hour incubation with OVCAR8 target cells (n = 5 donors). E, Representative flow plots of CD107a expression. Results are from two independent experiments and were analyzed via matched one-way ANOVA; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Expanded OCP PB- and ascites-NK cells reduce tumor burden and improve survival in a cell-line xenograft model of human OC. Expanded OCP PB-NK, OCP ascites (Asc)-NK, or HD PB-NK cells were adoptively transferred intraperitoneally to xenograft mice beginning 2 days following injection of OVCAR8-Luciferase (Luc) ovarian cancer cells. A, Schematic timeline of NK cell treatments. B, Mice were imaged at indicated days and tumor burden was quantified via bioluminescence (radiance). Results were analyzed via two-way ANOVA; ****, P < 0.0001 (n = 5 mice per group from one experiment). C, Images of mice at day 16 with color scale standardized across images. D, Survival of mice compared across groups and analyzed using the log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test followed by Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons; **, P < 0.0083 (n = 4–5 mice per group from one experiment).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Expanded OCP-NK cells reduce burden of established ovarian cancer tumor. Expanded OCP PB-NK cells were adoptively transferred intraperitoneally to NRG mice beginning 8 days following injection of OVCAR8-Luc ovarian cancer cells. A, Schematic timeline of NK cell treatments. B, Mice were imaged at indicated days and tumor burden was quantified via bioluminescence (radiance). Results were analyzed via two-way ANOVA; **, P < 0.01 (n = 5 mice per group from one experiment). C, Images of mice at days 8 and 11 with color scale standardized across images.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Establishment of patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model of human ovarian cancer. A, Schematic of model establishment: primary ovarian cancer cells in indicated volume of either PBS or ascites fluid were injected intraperitoneally into NRG mice. Tumor burden was assessed at endpoint. B, Survival of mice following injection of indicated doses of ovarian cancer cells in PBS or ascites fluid. C, Short-term survival of mice based on volume of ascites fluid injected to assess volume-based toxicity. D, CA-125 levels quantified in ascites of PDX mice compared with peritoneal fluid of control NRG mice. Results were analyzed via an unpaired t test; *, P < 0.05 (control NRG mice n = 3; PDX mice n = 5 from 2 experiments). E–G, Representative histologic tumor cross-sections stained with H&E. E, Image of tumor core taken at 20× objective magnification; scale bar, 200 μm. F, Image encompassing tumor edge and core taken at 4× objective magnification; scale bar, 500 μm. G, Image of tumor edge taken at 20× objective magnification; scale bar, 200 μm.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Expanded NK cells maintain a cytotoxic phenotype in an autologous ovarian cancer microenvironment. Expanded OCP PB-NK, OCP ascites (Asc)-NK, or HD PB-NK cells were adoptively transferred intraperitoneally to PDX mice with visible signs of ascites or control NRG mice with no tumor. Forty-eight hours following adoptive NK cell transfer, ascites or peritoneal fluid was collected from mice and cells were stained with NK cell markers for flow-cytometric analysis of NK cell phenotype. A, Representative flow plot of gating strategy. NK cells were identified as human (h)CD45+hCD56+hCD3−. Proportion of (B) CD56superbright NK cells, (C) CD16 expression, (D) NKp46 expression, and (E) NKp30 expression on NK cells. Results were analyzed via two-way ANOVA; *, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001 (tumor group n = 5; no tumor control group n = 3 from one experiment).

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Expanded OCP PB- and ascites-NK cells reduce tumor burden against autologous ovarian cancer. A, In vitro cytotoxicity assay of expanded NK cells against primary ovarian cancer cells passaged once in NRG mice. B, Representative flow plot of percent expression of MHC I on primary ovarian cancer cells in comparison with cells stained with the corresponding isotype control. C–E, Expanded OCP PB-NK cells, OCP ascites (Asc)-NK cells, or HD PB-NK cells were adoptively transferred i.p. to PDX mice beginning 2 days following injections of primary ovarian cancer cells. C, Schematic timeline of NK cell treatments. D, Abdominal circumference was measured at indicated days. Results were analyzed via one-way ANOVA; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001 (control group n = 4; NK cell groups n = 5 mice per group from one experiment). E, Representative images of peritoneal tumor burden at day 24. Red arrows indicate solid epithelial tumors.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplementary Data

    • Sup Figure 1 - Expanded NK cell activation and inhibitory receptor expression with increasing CD56 brightness.
    • Sup. Figure 2 - Expression of NK cell activation and inhibitory ligands on resistant primary ovarian cancer cells.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Immunology Research: 6 (10)
October 2018
Volume 6, Issue 10
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Editorial Board (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Immunology Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Expanded CD56superbrightCD16+ NK Cells from Ovarian Cancer Patients Are Cytotoxic against Autologous Tumor in a Patient-Derived Xenograft Murine Model
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Immunology Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Immunology Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Expanded CD56superbrightCD16+ NK Cells from Ovarian Cancer Patients Are Cytotoxic against Autologous Tumor in a Patient-Derived Xenograft Murine Model
Sophie M. Poznanski, Tina Nham, Marianne V. Chew, Amanda J. Lee, Joanne A. Hammill, Isabella Y. Fan, Martin Butcher, Jonathan L. Bramson, Dean A. Lee, Hal W. Hirte and Ali A. Ashkar
Cancer Immunol Res October 1 2018 (6) (10) 1174-1185; DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0144

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Expanded CD56superbrightCD16+ NK Cells from Ovarian Cancer Patients Are Cytotoxic against Autologous Tumor in a Patient-Derived Xenograft Murine Model
Sophie M. Poznanski, Tina Nham, Marianne V. Chew, Amanda J. Lee, Joanne A. Hammill, Isabella Y. Fan, Martin Butcher, Jonathan L. Bramson, Dean A. Lee, Hal W. Hirte and Ali A. Ashkar
Cancer Immunol Res October 1 2018 (6) (10) 1174-1185; DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0144
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Nutlin-3a: An Immune-Checkpoint Activator for NK Cells in Neuroblastoma
  • Therapy to Engage, Expand, and Enable Antitumor Responses
  • Dietary Fructose Promotes Resistance to Cancer Immunotherapy
Show more Research Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Cancer Immunology Essentials

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Immunology Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Immunology Research
eISSN: 2326-6074
ISSN: 2326-6066

Advertisement