Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Cancer Immunology Essentials
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • "Best of" Collection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Immunology Research
Cancer Immunology Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Cancer Immunology Essentials
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • "Best of" Collection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Research Articles

PI3Kγ Activates Integrin α4 and Promotes Immune Suppressive Myeloid Cell Polarization during Tumor Progression

Philippe Foubert, Megan M. Kaneda and Judith A. Varner
Philippe Foubert
1Moores UCSD Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Megan M. Kaneda
1Moores UCSD Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Judith A. Varner
1Moores UCSD Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, California.
2Department of Pathology, University of California, San Diego, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jvarner@ucsd.edu
DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-17-0143 Published November 2017
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    PI3Kγ and integrin α4 similarly impact tumor progression and CD11b+Gr1+ MDSC infiltration. A, Weights of LLC tumors implanted in WT versus α4Y991A or PI3Kγ–/− animals and of tumors that were treated with anti-α4 blocking or isotype antibodies (10 mg/kg every 3 days) or with the PI3Kγ inhibitor TG100-115 or vehicle (****, P < 0.0001; n = 10). B, Time course of LLC tumor growth in WT versus α4Y991A or PI3Kγ–/− animals (n = 10). C, Weights of orthotopic Panc02 pancreatic adenocarcinoma tumors from WT, α4Y991A or PI3Kγ–/− animals (***, P < 0.001; n = 10). D, Representative FACs profiles of CD11b+ myeloid cell populations in LLC tumors from WT, α4Y991A, and PI3Kγ–/− mice from A (**, P < 0.01). E, Quantification of CD11b+Gr1+ myeloid cells as a percentage of live cells in tumors from A (n = 4). F, Quantification of CD11b+Gr1+ myeloid cells as a percentage of live cells from C (**, P < 0.01; n = 4). G, Quantification of CD11b+Gr1hi neutrophils, CD11b+Gr1lo monocytes and CD11b+Gr1− macrophages as a percent of live cells in tumors from A (n = 4; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01). H, FACs profiles of Ly6G, F4/80, CD206, and CD11c in the three myeloid cell populations observed in D and quantified in G. Similar results were obtained in 3 replicate experiments. Error bars, SEM.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Blockade of the PI3Kγ–integrin α4 pathway promotes infiltration and maturation of CD11c+ DC in the tumor microenvironment. A, Representative images of CD11c+ DCs (green, arrowhead) and CD11b+ myeloid cells (red, arrow) in cryosections from LLC and Panc02 tumors and LLC tumor draining lymph nodes from WT and α4Y991A mice. Scale bar, 100 μm. B, Quantitative analysis of CD11b+ and CD11c+ cells in LLC and Panc02 tumors in WT and α4Y991A mice from A, expressed as pixels per field (n = 5). **, P < 0.01 vs. WT. C, Quantitative analysis of CD11b+ and CD11c+ cells in LLC tumor-draining lymph nodes in WT and α4Y991A mice from A, expressed as pixels per field (n = 5). **, P < 0.01 vs. WT. Scale bar, 100 μm. D, Representative images of CD11c+ DCs and CD11b+ myeloid cells in LLC tumors implanted in integrin α4Y991A mice transplanted with WT or α4Y991A BM and in WT mice transplanted with α4Y991A or WT BM. Scale bar, 100 μm. E and F, Quantitative analysis of (E) CD11b+ and (F) CD11c+ pixels in tumors from D (n = 5). G, Quantitative analysis of CD11c+MHCII+ mature DCs in Panc02 tumors assessed by flow cytometry in WT, α4Y991A, and PI3Kγ–/− mice (n = 5). **, P < 0.01 vs. WT. H, Representative FACs plots of MHCII expression in CD11c+ cells from G. I, Quantification of CD11c+MHCII+ mature DC infiltration in LLC tumors assessed by flow cytometry in WT, α4Y991A, and PI3Kγ–/− mice and mice treated with anti-α4 or PI3Kγ inhibitor TG100-115 (n = 5); **, P < 0.01. J and K, Quantification of the ratio between mature DC (CD11c+/MHCII+) and immature DC (CD11c+/MHCII−) in Panc02 (J) and LLC (K) tumors from (G and I; n = 5) *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. L, Mean fluorescence intensity of CD11c, CD80, and CD86 in CD11b+ cells from d14 LLC tumors from WT, PI3Kγ, and α4Y991A animals (n = 4). *, P < 0.05 for differences between WT and mutants. Error bars, SEM.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Blockade of the PI3Kγ–integrin α4 pathway repolarizes tumor-associated myeloid cells. A and B, mRNA expression of immune related cytokines in (A) LLC and (B) Panc02 tumors from WT, α4Y991A, and PI3Kγ–/− mice (n = 4) *P < 0.05. C–D, mRNA expression of immune related cytokines in LLC tumors from mice that were treated with (C) anti-α4 versus isotype matched control antibody or (D) PI3Kγ inhibitor TG100-115 versus control (n = 4); **, P < 0.01. E, mRNA expression of immune-related cytokines in LLC tumor–associated myeloid cells from WT, α4Y991A, and PI3Kγ–/− mice (n = 4); **, P < 0.05. F, mRNA expression of immune-related cytokines in in vitro IL4-stimulated WT and α4Y991A macrophages (n = 4); *, P < 0.05. Error bars, SEM.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Integrin α4 activation controls IL10 expression. A, Il10 mRNA levels ± SEM in CD11b− and CD11b+ cell populations from LLC tumors (n = 3). B, IL10 protein concentration (pg/mg total protein) ± SEM in LLC tumors from WT and α4Y991A animals (n = 3); *, P < 0.05. C,Il10 mRNA levels ± SEM in tumors from WT and α4Y991A bone marrow–transplanted animals (n = 3); *, P < 0.05. D, Mean LLC tumor volumes ± SEM from mice that were treated with two doses of anti-IL10 or cIgG (n = 6); *, P < 0.05.E, Percent CD11c+MHC+ DCs in tumors from D (n = 6); *, P < 0.05. F, Quantification of the ratio of mature DC (CD11c+/MHCII+) and immature DC (CD11c+/MHCII−) in mice from D (n = 6); **, P < 0.01. G, Il12b, (H) Ifng, and (I) Cd8a mRNA expression in tumors from D (n = 3); *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. J, Representative images of CD8+ T cells in LLC tumors from D. Scale bar, 100 μm. K, Mean CD8+ T cells in tumors ± SEM (pixels/field; n = 3); **, P < 0.01. Error bars, SEM.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Blockade of the PI3Kγ–integrin α4 pathway promotes CD8+ T-cell infiltration and T-cell cytotoxicity. A, Representative images of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell infiltration in LLC tumors in cryosections from WT, α4Y991A, and PI3Kγ–/−. Scale bar, 100 μm. B, Quantitative analysis CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in tumors from WT, α4Y991A, and PI3Kγ–/− mice (n = 5); **, P < 0.01 vs. WT. C, Flow cytometry analysis of CD4+ and CD8+ TILs from LLC tumor–bearing mice from WT, α4Y991A, and PI3Kγ–/− animals). D, The ratio of CD8+ to CD4+ T cells in tumors from WT, α4Y991A, and PI3Kγ–/− animals (n = 3); *, P < 0.05 vs. WT. E, Relative expression of Cd8a mRNA in TILs from LLC tumors from WT, α4Y991A, and PI3Kγ–/− animals (n = 4); *, P < 0.05. F, mRNA expression of Ifng, Il10, and Tgfb mRNA in TILs from LLC tumors from WT, α4Y991A, and PI3Kγ–/− animals (n = 4). G, TILs from LLC tumors from WT, α4Y991A, and PI3Kγ–/− animals were isolated and mixed with LLC tumor cells. T cell-cytotoxic activity against parental LLC tumor cells was assessed in an ex vivo CTL assay (n = 6); *, P < 0.05 vs. WT. Error bars, SEM.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Blockade of the PI3Kγ–integrin α4 pathway stimulates T cell–mediated cytotoxicity in vivo. A, LLC tumor cells were mixed with T cells isolated from LLC tumors grown in WT, α4Y991, or PI3Kγ–/− mice. The mixture was injected in the flank of naïve mice. Representative images of LLC tumors are shown. Scale bar, 1cm. B, Tumor weights analyzed after 10 days (n = 9–10); ***, P < 0.001 vs. WT. C, Representative images of apoptotic cells in LLC tumor by TUNEL immunostaining. D, Quantification of TUNEL+ cells from C (n = 9–10); ***, P < 0.001 vs. WT. E, Representative images of necrosis in LLC tumors by H&E staining. F, Quantification of necrotic areas in LLC tumors (n = 9–10). ***, P < 0.001 vs. WT. Error bars, SEM.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplementary Data

    • Figure S1 - Tumor growth curves
    • Supplementary Figure Legend - S1. PI3Kgamma and integrin alpha4 inhibitors suppress tumor progression.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Immunology Research: 5 (11)
November 2017
Volume 5, Issue 11
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Editorial Board (PDF)

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Immunology Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
PI3Kγ Activates Integrin α4 and Promotes Immune Suppressive Myeloid Cell Polarization during Tumor Progression
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Immunology Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Immunology Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
PI3Kγ Activates Integrin α4 and Promotes Immune Suppressive Myeloid Cell Polarization during Tumor Progression
Philippe Foubert, Megan M. Kaneda and Judith A. Varner
Cancer Immunol Res November 1 2017 (5) (11) 957-968; DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-17-0143

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
PI3Kγ Activates Integrin α4 and Promotes Immune Suppressive Myeloid Cell Polarization during Tumor Progression
Philippe Foubert, Megan M. Kaneda and Judith A. Varner
Cancer Immunol Res November 1 2017 (5) (11) 957-968; DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-17-0143
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Grant Support
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • CD28 Mutation Enhances CAR T-cell Function
  • ICV-Delivered CD19-CAR T Cells for CNS and Systemic Lymphoma
  • Activin A Mediates Radiation-Induced Antitumor Immunity
Show more Research Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Cancer Immunology Essentials

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Immunology Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Immunology Research
eISSN: 2326-6074
ISSN: 2326-6066

Advertisement