Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Cancer Immunology Essentials
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Toolbox: Coding and Computation
      • Toolbox: Signatures and Cells
      • "Best of" Collection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Immunology Research
Cancer Immunology Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Cancer Immunology Essentials
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Toolbox: Coding and Computation
      • Toolbox: Signatures and Cells
      • "Best of" Collection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Priority Brief

BRAFV600E Co-opts a Conserved MHC Class I Internalization Pathway to Diminish Antigen Presentation and CD8+ T-cell Recognition of Melanoma

Sherille D. Bradley, Zeming Chen, Brenda Melendez, Amjad Talukder, Jahan S. Khalili, Tania Rodriguez-Cruz, Shujuan Liu, Mayra Whittington, Wanleng Deng, Fenge Li, Chantale Bernatchez, Laszlo G. Radvanyi, Michael A. Davies, Patrick Hwu and Gregory Lizée
Sherille D. Bradley
1Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Center for Cancer Immunology Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zeming Chen
1Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Center for Cancer Immunology Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brenda Melendez
1Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Center for Cancer Immunology Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amjad Talukder
1Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Center for Cancer Immunology Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jahan S. Khalili
1Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Center for Cancer Immunology Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tania Rodriguez-Cruz
1Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Center for Cancer Immunology Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shujuan Liu
1Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Center for Cancer Immunology Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mayra Whittington
1Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Center for Cancer Immunology Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wanleng Deng
1Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Center for Cancer Immunology Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fenge Li
1Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Center for Cancer Immunology Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chantale Bernatchez
1Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Center for Cancer Immunology Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laszlo G. Radvanyi
1Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Center for Cancer Immunology Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael A. Davies
1Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Center for Cancer Immunology Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick Hwu
1Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Center for Cancer Immunology Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gregory Lizée
1Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Center for Cancer Immunology Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
2Department of Immunology, Center for Cancer Immunology Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: glizee@mdanderson.org
DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-15-0030 Published June 2015
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    MAPK pathway inhibition induces rapid upregulation of MHC class I surface expression in BRAF-mutant melanoma cell lines. A, flow-cytometric analysis showing HLA-A, B, and C surface expression in human dermal melanocytes transduced with lentiviral vectors expressing BRAFV600E and GFP or GFP alone. B, summary of MHC-I expression in three melanocyte lines, each transduced in triplicate; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity. C, melanoma cell lines harboring V600E-mutated BRAF (Mel888 and WM793) or WT BRAF (CHL1) were treated for 3 hours with either DMSO, dabrafenib, 50 nmol/L (BRAFi), or trametinib, 50 nmol/L (MEKi), then stained for total HLA-A, B, and C and analyzed by flow cytometry. D, confocal microscopy images of DMSO- or BRAFi-treated Mel888 and CHL1 cells following staining with fluorescently labeled HLA-A, B, and C–specific antibody. E, quantification of confocal imaging, with MHC-I surface expression expressed as mean pixel counts for at least 40 imaged cells within each treatment group. F, time-course experiment showing total MHC-I upregulation in Mel888, WM793, and CHL1 melanoma cells treated with dabrafenib for 30 minutes, 60 minutes, or 3 hours, as measured by flow cytometry. All experiments were performed at least four times with similar results; **, P < 0.01; ns, not statistically significant.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Modulation of MHC-I expression by the MAPK pathway is mediated by conserved MHC-I tail phosphorylation site Serine-335. A, Western blot analysis showing HLA-A*0201 immunoprecipitated from Mel888 and WM793 melanoma cells lentivirally transduced to express WT HLA-A*0201 or one of three cytoplasmic tail mutants of HLA-A*0201: ΔTail (ΔT), Y320A, or S335A. B, transduced Mel888 and WM793 melanoma cells were treated for 3 hours with either DMSO or dabrafenib, 50 nmol/L (BRAFi), then stained for HLA-A*0201 and analyzed by flow cytometry. C, quantification of BRAFi-induced changes in HLA-A*0201 surface expression, as measured by flow cytometry; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity. D, HLA-A2–transduced Mel888 or WM793 cells were treated with DMSO or MEKi for 3 hours. Following treatment, cells were stained with a fluorescently labeled HLA-A1–specific antibody and analyzed by flow cytometry. E, IFNγ release by MART-1–specific CD8+ TILs during 8 hours of coculture with HLA-A*0201–transduced Mel888 cells pretreated for 3 hours with DMSO or dabrafenib, 50 nmol/L, as measured by ELISA. F, the percentage of intracellular IFNγ-positive TILs following 3 hours of coculture with DMSO- or BRAFi-treated HLA-A*0201–transduced Mel888 cells or MART-1(27–35) peptide-pulsed WM793 cells, as measured by flow cytometry. All data are from representative experiments performed at least three times with comparable results; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.005; ns, not statistically significant.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    BRAFV600E promotes rapid MHC-I internalization and intracellular sequestration that is reversible with MAPK pathway inhibition. A, WM793 and CHL1 melanoma cells were surface-labeled with Alexa488-conjugated HLA-A, B, and C–specific mAb (green, 1° label) and then cultured at 37°C. At the indicated time points, cells were stained with an Alexa568-conjugated secondary antibody (red, 2° label) to double label the remaining cell surface MHC-I (yellow), and analyzed by confocal microscopy. White arrows indicate MHC-I (green) that was internalized during time in culture. B, same experiment as in A, except WM793 cells were pretreated with either DMSO or dabrafenib, 50 nmol/L for 2 hours before HLA-A, B, and C surface labeling, and then cultured at 37°C for 90 minutes with continued exposure to DMSO or BRAFi. C, time course of MHC-I surface expression in Mel888 (BRAFV600E) or MeWo (BRAF WT) melanoma cells following removal of dabrafenib from cell culture medium, as measured by flow cytometry. D, confocal images showing cellular distribution of total HLA-A, B, and C in permeabilized WM793 cells following a 2-hour treatment with DMSO or dabrafenib. White arrows indicate increased cell surface localization following BRAFi treatment. E, double staining of total MHC-I (green) and the endolysosomal marker LAMP-1 (red), with white color indicating overlap of the two markers. F, the percentage of pixels showing green/red (MHC-I and LAMP-1) colocalization, quantified from at least 40 imaged cells within each treatment group. All data are from representative experiments performed at least three times with comparable results; *, P < 0.05.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    The proposed model of melanoma cell MHC class I trafficking in the context of MAPK pathway activation or inhibition. Oncogenic activating BRAF mutations (e.g., V600E) in melanoma cells drive the rapid and constitutive internalization of MHC-I molecules from the cell surface and their subsequent sequestration within LAMP1-positive endolysosomal compartments (left). This redistribution process requires the conserved Serine-335 phosphorylation site (S) found within the cytoplasmic tail of MHC-I. Pharmaceutical inhibition of MAPK signaling can inhibit MHC-I internalization, thus altering the equilibrium and resulting in reduced endolysosomal sequestration and enhanced MHC-I surface expression within hours (right). This augmented MHC-I surface expression in turn leads to increased tumor cell recognition and function of melanoma antigen-specific CD8+ T cells.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplementary Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Figures 1 - 8 - Supplemental Figure 1. Three melanoma cell lines (CHL1, Mel888, and WM793) were treated with DMSO (0), 10uM, or 50uM of dabrafenib (BRAFi) for 3 hours. Whole cell lysates were prepared, and levels of phospho-ERK and total ERK were analyzed by immunoblotting. Supplemental Figure 2. Mel888 cells were treated with vehicle (DMSO) or 50 uM of BRAFi for 3 hours. Following treatment, cells were stained with fluorescently-labeled antibodies specific for MHC-I (HLA-A,B,C), MHC-II (HLA-DR), PD-L1, or melanoma-associated chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan (MCSP), and analyzed by flow cytometry. Data shown are representative of at least three replicate experiments with similar results. * indicates p < 0.05; ns, not significant. Supplemental Figure 3. HLA-A2-transduced Mel888 melanoma cell lines were treated with vehicle DMSO (0), 10uM, or 50uM of BRAFi for 3 hours. Whole cell lysates were prepared and levels of phospho-ERK and total ERK were analyzed by immunoblotting. Supplemental Figure 4. HLA-A2-transduced Mel888 or WM793 cells were treated with DMSO or MEKi for 3 hours. Following treatment, cells were stained with a fluorescently-labeled HLA-A2-specific antibody and analyzed by flow cytometry. These experiments were repeated at least four times with similar results. *** indicates p < 0.005; ns, not significant. Supplemental Figure 5. T2 cells were pulsed with titrated amounts of MART-1(27-35) peptide, washed, and then used as stimulator cells for MART1-specific CD8+ TILs. Supernatants were collected after 8 hours of co-culture and analyzed by ELISA to measure interferon-gamma (IFNgamma) release. Supplemental Figure 6. Percentage of intracellular IFNgamma-positive TILs following 3 hours of co-culture with DMSO- or BRAFi-treated HLA-A*0201-transduced Mel888 cells or MART-1(27-35) peptide-pulsed WM793 cells, as measured by flow cytometry. All data are representative of experiments performed at least 3 times with similar results. *, p<0.05; ns, not significant. Supplemental Figure 7. Mel888 cells were treated with 50 uM BRAFi for the indicated times, and cell lysates prepared. Cellular expression of MART-1 protein at each time point was assessed by immunoblotting and quantified using densitometry, with beta-actin levels measured as a loading control. Supplemental Figure 8. Mel888 cells were treated with DMSO, BRAFi, or MEKi for 2 hours and then labeled with 35S-Methionine for 20 min. Cells were placed back into culture at 37 C with continued exposure to drug or vehicle. Cells lysates were prepared at each of the indicated time points and total HLA-A2 was immunoprecipitated and analyzed using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Immunoprecipitated HLA-A2 was then analyzed for 35S content by Phosphor-imaging.
    • Supplemental Methods and Figure Legends - Supplemental Methods and Figure Legends
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Immunology Research: 3 (6)
June 2015
Volume 3, Issue 6
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Immunology Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
BRAFV600E Co-opts a Conserved MHC Class I Internalization Pathway to Diminish Antigen Presentation and CD8+ T-cell Recognition of Melanoma
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Immunology Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Immunology Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
BRAFV600E Co-opts a Conserved MHC Class I Internalization Pathway to Diminish Antigen Presentation and CD8+ T-cell Recognition of Melanoma
Sherille D. Bradley, Zeming Chen, Brenda Melendez, Amjad Talukder, Jahan S. Khalili, Tania Rodriguez-Cruz, Shujuan Liu, Mayra Whittington, Wanleng Deng, Fenge Li, Chantale Bernatchez, Laszlo G. Radvanyi, Michael A. Davies, Patrick Hwu and Gregory Lizée
Cancer Immunol Res June 1 2015 (3) (6) 602-609; DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-15-0030

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
BRAFV600E Co-opts a Conserved MHC Class I Internalization Pathway to Diminish Antigen Presentation and CD8+ T-cell Recognition of Melanoma
Sherille D. Bradley, Zeming Chen, Brenda Melendez, Amjad Talukder, Jahan S. Khalili, Tania Rodriguez-Cruz, Shujuan Liu, Mayra Whittington, Wanleng Deng, Fenge Li, Chantale Bernatchez, Laszlo G. Radvanyi, Michael A. Davies, Patrick Hwu and Gregory Lizée
Cancer Immunol Res June 1 2015 (3) (6) 602-609; DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-15-0030
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Grant Support
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Inducing CTLs through DLnano-vaccines to Target Cancer
  • Targeted Inhibitors Increase T-cell Activation
  • Remodeling Translation Primes T-cell Tumor Control
Show more Priority Brief
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Cancer Immunology Essentials

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Immunology Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Immunology Research
eISSN: 2326-6074
ISSN: 2326-6066

Advertisement