Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Cancer Immunology Essentials
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Toolbox: Coding and Computation
      • Toolbox: Signatures and Cells
      • "Best of" Collection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Immunology Research
Cancer Immunology Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Cancer Immunology Essentials
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • Toolbox: Coding and Computation
      • Toolbox: Signatures and Cells
      • "Best of" Collection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Research Articles

Enhancing Efficacy of Anticancer Vaccines by Targeted Delivery to Tumor-Draining Lymph Nodes

Laura Jeanbart, Marie Ballester, Alexandre de Titta, Patricia Corthésy, Pedro Romero, Jeffrey A. Hubbell and Melody A. Swartz
Laura Jeanbart
1Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences and School of Engineering; 2Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research (ISREC), School of Life Sciences; 3Institute for Chemical Sciences and Engineering, School of Basic Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL); and 4Ludwig Center for Cancer Research, Université de Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
1Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences and School of Engineering; 2Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research (ISREC), School of Life Sciences; 3Institute for Chemical Sciences and Engineering, School of Basic Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL); and 4Ludwig Center for Cancer Research, Université de Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marie Ballester
1Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences and School of Engineering; 2Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research (ISREC), School of Life Sciences; 3Institute for Chemical Sciences and Engineering, School of Basic Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL); and 4Ludwig Center for Cancer Research, Université de Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
1Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences and School of Engineering; 2Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research (ISREC), School of Life Sciences; 3Institute for Chemical Sciences and Engineering, School of Basic Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL); and 4Ludwig Center for Cancer Research, Université de Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexandre de Titta
1Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences and School of Engineering; 2Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research (ISREC), School of Life Sciences; 3Institute for Chemical Sciences and Engineering, School of Basic Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL); and 4Ludwig Center for Cancer Research, Université de Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patricia Corthésy
1Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences and School of Engineering; 2Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research (ISREC), School of Life Sciences; 3Institute for Chemical Sciences and Engineering, School of Basic Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL); and 4Ludwig Center for Cancer Research, Université de Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
1Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences and School of Engineering; 2Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research (ISREC), School of Life Sciences; 3Institute for Chemical Sciences and Engineering, School of Basic Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL); and 4Ludwig Center for Cancer Research, Université de Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pedro Romero
1Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences and School of Engineering; 2Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research (ISREC), School of Life Sciences; 3Institute for Chemical Sciences and Engineering, School of Basic Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL); and 4Ludwig Center for Cancer Research, Université de Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey A. Hubbell
1Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences and School of Engineering; 2Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research (ISREC), School of Life Sciences; 3Institute for Chemical Sciences and Engineering, School of Basic Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL); and 4Ludwig Center for Cancer Research, Université de Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
1Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences and School of Engineering; 2Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research (ISREC), School of Life Sciences; 3Institute for Chemical Sciences and Engineering, School of Basic Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL); and 4Ludwig Center for Cancer Research, Université de Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melody A. Swartz
1Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences and School of Engineering; 2Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research (ISREC), School of Life Sciences; 3Institute for Chemical Sciences and Engineering, School of Basic Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL); and 4Ludwig Center for Cancer Research, Université de Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
1Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences and School of Engineering; 2Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research (ISREC), School of Life Sciences; 3Institute for Chemical Sciences and Engineering, School of Basic Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL); and 4Ludwig Center for Cancer Research, Université de Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
1Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences and School of Engineering; 2Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research (ISREC), School of Life Sciences; 3Institute for Chemical Sciences and Engineering, School of Basic Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL); and 4Ludwig Center for Cancer Research, Université de Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0019-T Published May 2014
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    The tdLN is enlarged and immune suppressed, but contains tumor antigen–primed T cells. A total of 106 E.G7-OVA cells were inoculated intradermally on one side of the back such that tumor-draining and non–tumor-draining lymph nodes (tdLN and non-tdLN, respectively) could be compared at various time points. A, representative LN sections of tumor-bearing mice demonstrate enlargement of the tdLN compared with non-tdLN 14 days after tumor inoculation (white, lyve-1; red, CD3; green, B220); scale bar, 500 μm. B–H, characterization of LN-resident leukocytes 11 days after tumor inoculation. B, relative cell distributions show an increase in B- (B220+) to T-cell (CD3+) ratios in the tdLN versus non-tdLN, while percentages of total leukocytes (CD45+) as well as macrophages (CD11b+ MHCII+), DCs (CD11c+ MHCII+), and immature myeloid cells (CD11b+ MHCII−) were unchanged 11 days after tumor inoculation. C and D, cross-presenting DCs (CD8+ CD11b−) as percentages of CD11c+ MHCII+ DCs (G) and total live cells (H). E, PD-L1 expression by mature DCs (CD11c+ MHCII+). F, PD-1 expression by CD8+ T cells. G, relative numbers of LN-resident TAA-specific CD8+ T cells as determined by SIINFEKL-MHCI pentamer staining on days 4, 7, and 11 after tumor inoculation. H, functionality of CD8+ T cells after 6 hours restimulation as reflected by intracellular cytokine staining. Data reflect two independent experiments with 8 mice per group. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Nanoparticle conjugation enhances cell targeting and therapeutic efficacy of OVA + CpG cancer vaccines. Responses of B16-F10 (A–D) and E.G7-OVA (E–K) tumor-bearing mice to therapeutic vaccination are shown. Vaccination schedule (A), B16-F10 tumor volumes (B), overall survival rates (C), and circulating TRP-2180–188–specific CD8+ T cells (D) 11 days after tumor inoculation (as determined by TRP-2180–188–MHCI pentamer staining). Vaccination schedule (E), E.G7-OVA tumor volumes (F), percentage of mice with tumor shrinkage after vaccination (G), overall survival rates (H), and circulating OVA257–264–specific CD8+ T cells (I) on days 11 and 18. J and K, on day 7 after tumor inoculation, E.G7-OVA tumor-bearing mice were injected intradermally with Alexa Fluor 488–labeled OVA and DY633-labeled CpG, either free or nanoparticle conjugated, in the front footpad either ipsi or contra to the tumor, and brachial LNs were analyzed 24 hours later. Nanoparticle conjugation leads to better targeting of OVA and CpG by mature macrophages (MΦ, MHCII+ CD11b+) and DCs (MHCII+ CD11c+) in the tdLN after ipsi injection (J) and in the non-tdLN after contra injection (K). Data reflect two independent experiments with 8 mice per group. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    The tdLN is a more effective vaccine target site than the non-tdLN for a tumor antigen, but a less effective site for a nontumor antigen. Responses of EL-4 and E.G7-OVA tumor-bearing mice to therapeutic vaccination ipsi or contra to the tumor. A, vaccination schedule. B, day 11 tumor volumes, and C, circulating OVA257–264–specific CD8+ T cells 11 days after tumor inoculation in EL-4 versus E.G7-OVA tumor-bearing mice. Data reflect two independent experiments with 5 to 10 mice per group. **, P < 0.01.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Therapeutic vaccines targeting the tdLN are more effective than those targeting the non-tdLN, but only after tumor growth has begun. Response of E.G7-OVA tumor-bearing mice to therapeutic vaccination with 10 μg NP-OVA + 1 μg NP-CpG ipsi or contra to the tumor 4 days (A), 7 days (B), or 11 days (C) after tumor inoculation: tumor volumes (top), survival (middle), and proportions of circulating OVA257–264–specific CD8+ T cells (bottom) 7, 14, and 21 days after vaccination of immunized and control mice (n.d., no data; statistics, ipsi vs. contra). A, at 4 days after inoculation, before tumors are visible, there is very little difference between vaccinating the tdLN versus the non-tdLN in terms of tumor response. B, in contrast, when vaccinated after 7 days, when tumors are visible and have presumably affected the tdLN, large differences are seen between contra versus ipsi vaccination, and only the ipsi-vaccinated group survives with no tumor regrowth. C, when mice are vaccinated at day 11 of tumor growth, which is close to the size limit before death or sacrifice is necessary, only the tdLN-targeted group can be rescued, while the non–tdLN-targeted group show no response to the vaccine. Response of B16-F10 melanoma-bearing mice after vaccination with 10 μg NP-TRP-2180–188 + 1 μg NP-CpG ipsi or contra to the tumor: tumor volumes (D), survival (E), and proportions (F) of circulating TRP-2180–188–specific CD8+ T cells 11 days after tumor inoculation of immunized and control B16-F10 tumor-bearing mice. Data reflect several independent experiments with 5 to 10 mice per group. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; n.s., not significant P > 0.05.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Targeting a nanoparticle vaccine to the tdLN enhances the effector CD8+ T-cell response locally and systemically. CD8+ T-cell responses 7 days after vaccination in E.G7-OVA tumor-bearing mice immunized with 10 μg NP-OVA + 1 μg NP-CpG ipsi or contra to the tumor. A, vaccination schedule. B, representative flow cytometry plots of SIINFEKL–MHCI pentamer staining of tumor-infiltrating CTLs (CD44+ CD62L− effector CD8+ T cells). C, proportion of OVA257–264–specific CTLs (CD44+ CD62L− effector CD8+ T cells) in the tumor, spleen, tdLN, and non-tdLN as determined by SIINFEKL–MHCI pentamer staining. D, tumor-infiltrating OVA257–264–specific CD8+ T cells with an effector (CD44+ CD62L−) versus an exhausted (PD-1+) phenotype. E–H, cells from spleens and LNs were restimulated ex vivo with SIINFEKL (1 μg/mL) for 6 hours before staining for intracellular cytokines and analysis by flow cytometry. E, representative flow cytometry plots of spleen CD8+ T cells stained for IFN-γ+ and TNF-α+. Values in the dot plots represent the percentage of CD8+ T cells in each gate. Proportion of IFN-γ+, IFN-γ+ TNF-α+, and IFN-γ+ TNF-α+ IL-2+ cytotoxic CD8+ T cells in the spleen (F), tdLN (G), and non-tdLN (H) of ipsi, contra, and control mice after SIINFEKL restimulation. Data reflect two independent experiments with 8 mice per group. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Targeting the tdLN with nanoparticle-conjugated OVA and CpG reduces the frequencies of tumor-infiltrating MDSCs and Tregs. Mice were immunized as described in Fig. 5A. Tumors (A–E) and spleens (F–G) were collected and analyzed by flow cytometry. A and B, representative flow cytometry plots (A) and pie charts (B) of Gr1-stained CD11b+ MHCII− immature myeloid cells in the tumor: cells were gated on CD11b+ MHCII− cells and numbers indicate the proportion of Gr1hi, Gr1int, and Gr1lo cells as a percentage of CD11b+ MHCII−. C, frequencies of Gr1+ CD11b+ cells as a percentage of CD45+ cells: immature MHCII− cells (left) and mature MHCII+ cells (right). D, frequency of Foxp3+ CD4+ Tregs as a percentage of CD45+ cells. E, ratio of Foxp3+ CD4+ Tregs to all CTLs (CD44+ CD62L− effector CD8+ T cells) and to OVA257–264–specific CTLs in the tumor. F and G, frequencies of immature (MHCII−, left) and mature (MHCII+, right) Gr1+ CD11b+ cells (F) and frequency of Foxp3+ CD4+ Tregs (G) as a percentage of CD45+ cells in the spleen. Data reflect two independent experiments with 8 mice per group. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Supplementary Data

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplementary Methods, Figure Legends - PDF file - 254K
    • Supplementary Figure 1 - PDF file - 37K, NPs target the tdLN.
    • Supplementary Figure 2 - PDF file - 51K, NP-conjugated OVA and CpG induces functional OVA257-264-specific CD8+ T cells and antibodies.
    • Supplementary Figure 3 - PDF file - 23K, Targeting the tdLN with NP-TRP-2 + free CpG is therapeutically more beneficial than targeting a non-tdLN.
    • Supplementary Figure 4 - PDF file - 22K, Targeting the tdLN with NP-OVA and NP-CpG induces more antigen-specific and effector CD8+ T cells in the tumor, spleen, and tdLN.
    • Supplementary Figure 5 - PDF file - 42K, CD4+ T cells are more polyfunctional upon ex vivo restimulation when NP-OVA + NP-CpG is targeted to the tdLN.
    • Supplementary Figure 6 - PDF file - 22K, As the tumor progresses, OVA expression decreases in the tumor.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Immunology Research: 2 (5)
May 2014
Volume 2, Issue 5
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Immunology Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Enhancing Efficacy of Anticancer Vaccines by Targeted Delivery to Tumor-Draining Lymph Nodes
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Immunology Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Immunology Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Enhancing Efficacy of Anticancer Vaccines by Targeted Delivery to Tumor-Draining Lymph Nodes
Laura Jeanbart, Marie Ballester, Alexandre de Titta, Patricia Corthésy, Pedro Romero, Jeffrey A. Hubbell and Melody A. Swartz
Cancer Immunol Res May 1 2014 (2) (5) 436-447; DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0019-T

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Enhancing Efficacy of Anticancer Vaccines by Targeted Delivery to Tumor-Draining Lymph Nodes
Laura Jeanbart, Marie Ballester, Alexandre de Titta, Patricia Corthésy, Pedro Romero, Jeffrey A. Hubbell and Melody A. Swartz
Cancer Immunol Res May 1 2014 (2) (5) 436-447; DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0019-T
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Grant Support
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Myeloid-Targeted CXCR2 Deletion Improves Antitumor Immunity
  • Metabolic Screening of CD8+ T Cells
  • Nutlin-3a: An Immune-Checkpoint Activator for NK Cells in Neuroblastoma
Show more Research Articles
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Cancer Immunology Essentials

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Immunology Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Immunology Research
eISSN: 2326-6074
ISSN: 2326-6066

Advertisement