Advertisement
Priority Briefs

CD4+ T Effectors Specific for the Tumor Antigen NY-ESO-1 Are Highly Enriched at Ovarian Cancer Sites and Coexist with, but Are Distinct from, Tumor-Associated Treg

Maha Ayyoub, Pascale Pignon, Jean-Marc Classe, Kunle Odunsi and Danila Valmori
DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0062-T Published November 2013

Abstract

Whereas tumor infiltration by T effectors is generally associated with a more favorable prognosis, the accumulation of CD4+ regulatory T cells (Treg) within tumors is instead often associated with poor disease outcome. Because approaches to improve antitumor immunity aim, on one hand, at expanding tumor antigen-specific T cells and, on the other, at eliminating or inactivating Treg, an outstanding question is whether, and to what extent, tumor antigen-specific CD4+ T effectors present at tumor sites overlap with tumor-associated Treg. Here, we used MHC class II/peptide tetramers incorporating an immunodominant peptide from the human tumor-specific antigen NY-ESO-1 to assess antigen-specific CD4+ T cells among conventional CD4+ T effectors and Treg at sites of ovarian cancer. We found that, in patients who spontaneously respond to the antigen, the frequency of NY-ESO-1 tetramer+ cells detected ex vivo was highly enriched in tumors as compared with the periphery. At tumor sites, NY-ESO-1 tetramer+ cells were detected concomitantly with high proportions of Treg but were distinct from the latter and displayed characteristics of TH1 effectors. Thus, even in the presence of high proportions of Treg, tumor antigen-specific CD4+ T cells can accumulate in ovarian tumors and maintain an effector phenotype. Cancer Immunol Res; 1(5); 303–8. ©2013 AACR.

Introduction

The balance between T-cell subsets that play opposite immune functions is a determinant factor in antitumor immunity. The presence of high proportions of T effectors at tumor sites is generally associated with efficient antitumor responses (1), whereas that of regulatory/suppressor CD4+ T cells (Treg) has been often reported to be associated with less favorable clinical outcomes (2). Some studies, however, have instead reported an association between high levels of FOXP3+ Treg and improved clinical outcomes (3, 4), a contradictory finding that could possibly result from the fact that certain subsets of Treg comigrate with T effectors and are therefore enriched in tumors that are also highly infiltrated by T effectors (5). In support of their favorable role in antitumor immunity, T effectors in tumors have been found to contain cells that recognize antigens expressed by cancer cells, leading to their elimination (6).

On the basis of this evidence, strategies to improve antitumor immunity currently aim at increasing tumor antigen-specific T effectors in patients with cancer through various approaches, including vaccination, adoptive cell transfer therapy, and/or checkpoint blockade (7–10). Other potentially complementary approaches aim instead at impacting Treg by eliminating/inactivating them or converting them into effectors (11). However, because the antigen specificity of Treg infiltrating human tumors is largely unknown, an outstanding question in the development of all these approaches is whether, and to what extent, tumor antigen-specific CD4+ T effectors present at tumor sites overlap with tumor-infiltrating Treg. This, however, has been difficult to assess, partly because Treg are anergic, i.e., unable to proliferate or produce cytokines following T-cell receptor (TCR)-mediated stimulation, which complicates the assessment of their antigen specificity.

NY-ESO-1, a human tumor-specific antigen of the cancer/testis group expressed in germ cells and in cancer, but not in normal somatic tissues (12), is a major candidate for the development of immunotherapy in cancers of different histologic types. NY-ESO-1 is frequently expressed in high-grade serous ovarian cancer, a tumor type in which Treg are present in high proportions and may significantly contribute to dampen antitumor immunity (2, 13, 14). We have previously identified an immunodominant peptide, NY-ESO-1119-143, recognized by NY-ESO-1–specific CD4+ T cells, and have generated MHC class II/NY-ESO-1 peptide tetramers that allow the direct assessment of antigen-specific CD4+ T cells by flow cytometry, independent of their function (15). Here, we have used the tetramers to directly assess NY-ESO-1–specific cells ex vivo among conventional CD4+ T cells and Treg present at sites of ovarian cancers in patients with spontaneous serologic responses to the antigen.

Materials and Methods

Patient samples and phenotypic assessment of CD4+ T cells

Surgical tumor specimens and peripheral blood samples were obtained at the Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (Nantes-Saint Herblain, France) and Roswell Park Cancer Institute (Buffalo, NY) from patients with ovarian cancer upon approval by the institutional review boards and signed informed consent. Tumor specimens were processed by mechanical dissection to single-cell suspensions. Cells from ovarian cancer ascites were isolated by centrifugation. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated by density gradient sedimentation using LSM 1077 lymphocyte separation medium (PAA Laboratories GmbH). CD4+ T cells were enriched by positive selection using magnetic cell sorting (Miltenyi Biotec) from PBMC and single-cell suspensions from ovarian solid tumors or ascites. Isolated CD4+ T cells were assessed phenotypically by staining with fluorochrome-labeled monoclonal antibodies (mAb; from BD Biosciences unless indicated otherwise) specific for CD4, CD25 (Beckman Coulter), CD127 and FOXP3 (eBioscience), as indicated, and analyzed by flow cytometry (FACSAria, BD Biosciences). For assessment of NY-ESO-1–specific cells, isolated CD4+ T cells were stained with phycoerythrin-labeled HLA-DR52b/His-tag-NY-ESO-1119–143 tetramers (TCMetrix) and anti-CD4, -CD25, and -CD127 mAb as previously described (15). For ex vivo flow cytometry cell sorting, enriched CD4+ T cells were stained with mAb specific for CD4, CD25, and CD127 and separated into Tconv (CD4+CD25low) and Treg (CD4+CD25highCD127low) to high purity (>97%) by flow cytometry cell sorting (FACSAria, BD Biosciences).

Functional assessment of CD4+ T cells

The ability of tumor-associated CD4+ T cells to produce IFN-γ was assessed in a 6-hour intracellular cytokine staining assay using mAb specific for IFN-γ and FOXP3 following stimulation with PMA (100 ng/mL; Sigma-Aldrich) and ionomycin (1 μg/mL; Sigma-Aldrich), as previously described (5). The suppressive capacity of ex vivo-sorted tumor-associated Treg and Tconv was assessed by coculture with CFSE-labeled responder CD4+ T cells in the presence of irradiated monocytes and phytohemagglutinin (PHA; Sigma-Aldrich). Growth of responder cells was assessed by flow cytometry analysis of CFSE dilution in day-5 cultures. The growth (percentage of divided cells) of the wells with the test population (experimental group) was compared with that of the wells without the test population (control). The percentage of suppression was determined as follows: 100 − [(growth of experimental group/growth of control) × 100; ref. 5]. NY-ESO-1-tetramer+ T-cell lines were obtained by stimulation of tetramer+ cells, isolated by flow cytometry cell sorting from tumor-associated CD4+ T cells, with PHA and irradiated allogeneic feeder cells as previously described (15). To assess antigen recognition, the lines were stimulated with serial dilutions of NY-ESO-1119–143 in the presence of HLA-DR52b+ antigen-presenting cells (APC), and secreted IFN-γ was measured in 24-hour supernatants by ELISA. The ability of the lines to produce cytokines was assessed in a 4-hour intracellular cytokine staining assay following stimulation with PMA/ionomycin using mAb specific for IFN-γ, TNF-α, interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4, IL-10, and IL-17 (eBioscience).

Results and Discussion

A phenotypic and functional analysis of ovarian cancer-associated conventional CD4+ T effectors (Tconv) and Treg was initially carried out using cell suspensions obtained ex vivo from ovarian cancer ascites (TAL) or from mechanically dissociated ovarian tumor tissue tumor-infiltrating leukocytes (TIL). Treg were identified among CD4+ T cells as CD25highCD127low, and Tconv were identified as CD25low (Fig. 1A). Treg identified by this phenotype in tumor samples expressed high levels of FOXP3 and were highly suppressive ex vivo (Fig. 1B and C). In contrast, Tconv had little expression of FOXP3 and no suppressive activity. Tumor-associated Tconv stimulated ex vivo produced, for the most part, high levels of IFN-γ, whereas most tumor-associated FOXP3+ Treg failed to secrete IFN-γ (Fig. 1D). Thus, whereas tumor-associated Treg were highly suppressive ex vivo, most tumor-associated CD4+ Tconv instead displayed characteristics of effector cells.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Phenotype and function of Tconv and Treg in ovarian cancer. A and B, CD4+ T cells isolated from TAL and TIL were stained with mAb specific for CD4, CD25, CD127, and FOXP3 and analyzed by flow cytometry. Within the CD4+ T-cell gate, Treg are identified as CD25highCD127low and Tconv as CD25low (A). Gated Treg and Tconv were examined for intracellular FOXP3 expression (B). Examples of dot plots are shown for 1 TIL and 1 TAL in A. Examples of histograms are shown for 1 TIL in B, and data obtained for all samples are summarized in B. C, Treg and Tconv isolated ex vivo from TIL were cultured with CFSE-labeled responder CD4+ T cells in the presence of PHA and APC for 5 days. The percentage of suppression was calculated as detailed in Materials and Methods. D, CD4+ T cells isolated from tumors were stimulated ex vivo with PMA/ionomycin for 6 hours followed by labeling with FOXP3- and IFN-γ–specific mAb. A dot plot corresponding to CD4+ T cells from 1 TIL is shown, and data obtained with all samples are summarized. Numbers correspond to the percentage of IFN-γ+ cells in FOXP3+ (Treg) and FOXP3− (Tconv) cells.

Integrated immune responses to NY-ESO-1, including specific antibodies, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, spontaneously develop in patients with ovarian cancer bearing antigen-expressing tumors (13). Using MHC class II (DR52b/DRB3*0202)/NY-ESO-1 peptide tetramers, we have previously shown that NY-ESO-1-tetramer+ cells are detected among circulating CD4+ T cells from patients with spontaneous antibody responses to the antigen, but not in healthy donors or in NY-ESO-1–seronegative patients (15, 16). By assessing a group of 215 patients with ovarian cancer, 20 patients with detectable levels of circulating NY-ESO-1 antibodies were identified. For 2 patients who were DRB3*0202+, cryopreserved PBMC and cell suspensions from TAL and TIL were available. From these samples, CD4+ T cells were enriched ex vivo by magnetic cell sorting and stained with tetramers in combination with anti-CD25 and -CD127 mAb. NY-ESO-1-tetramer+ cells were detected ex vivo in all samples (Fig. 2A). For patient OC1, tetramer+ cells were detected among CD4+ T cells in TAL and TIL at a frequency of 0.3% and 1%, respectively, i.e., about 20- and 60-fold higher than in circulating CD4+ T cells (Fig. 2B). Similarly, for patient OC2 the frequency of tetramer+ cells among CD4+ T cells in TAL and TIL was 0.1% and 0.2%, respectively, i.e., 5- and 10-fold higher than in the periphery.

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

CD4+ NY-ESO-1-tetramer+ T cells are highly enriched in tumors from DRB3*0202+ patients with spontaneous immune responses to the antigen.CD4+ T cells isolated from PBMC, TAL, and TIL were stained with NY-ESO-1 tetramers and with anti-CD4 mAb and analyzed by flow cytometry. Examples of dot plots are shown in A; numbers correspond to the percentage of tetramer+ cells) and data are summarized in B.

We have previously reported that NY-ESO-1-tetramer+ cells in circulating CD4+ T cells from patients with both spontaneous and vaccine-induced immune responses to NY-ESO-1 are found among Tconv and not Treg (15, 16). Consistent with this, we found that NY-ESO-1-tetramer+ T cells in circulating CD4+ T cells from patients OC1 and OC2 were CD25lowCD127high (Fig. 3A and B). Similarly, NY-ESO-1-tetramer+ cells in both TAL and TIL were distinct from tumor-associated CD25highCD127low Treg, as they were largely CD25low and expressed various levels of CD127 (Fig. 3A and B), a phenotype that has been reported to identify differentiated effector cells producing IFN-γ (17).

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

CD4+ NY-ESO-1-tetramer+ T cells at tumor sites are distinct from tumor-associated Treg. CD4+ T cells isolated from PBMC, TAL, and TIL were stained with NY-ESO-1 tetramers and with anti-CD4, -CD25, and -CD127 mAb and analyzed by flow cytometry. Examples of dot plots, gated on CD4+ cells, are shown in A. The mean fluorescence intensities (MFI) of CD25 and CD127 staining in Tconv (CD25low), Treg (CD25highCD127low), and NY-ESO-1-tetramer+ cells (gated as shown in A) are summarized for all samples in B.

To assess tumor-associated NY-ESO-1–specific CD4+ T effectors functionally, we isolated NY-ESO-1-tetramer+ T cells from TIL and TAL and expanded them in vitro by mitogen stimulation to generate NY-ESO-1-tetramer+ T-cell lines (Fig. 4A and B). The lines obtained following this strategy exhibited a clear TH1 effector profile as they produced high levels of IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2 but did not produce cytokines associated with other CD4+ T-cell subsets, such as IL-17, IL-4, or IL-10 (Fig. 4C).

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Tumor-associated NY-ESO-1-tetramer+ CD4+ T cells exhibit a TH1 cytokine secretion profile. A, TIL and TAL, grown in vitro for 2 weeks in the presence of IL-2, were stained with NY-ESO-1 tetramers and anti-CD4 mAb (left dot plot), and tetramer+ CD4+ cells were sorted by flow cytometry and expanded by mitogen stimulation to generate NY-ESO-1–specific CD4+ T-cell lines. Samples of the T-cell lines were stained with tetramers and anti-CD4 mAb and analyzed by flow cytometry (middle and right dot plots). B, T-cell lines were assessed for antigen recognition by incubation with serial dilutions of NY-ESO-1119–143 or control peptide in the presence of DRB3*0202+ APC, and IFN-γ was measured in 24-hour supernatants by ELISA. C, the T-cell lines were assessed for cytokine production in a 4-hour intracellular cytokine staining assay. Data obtained with the TIL-derived T-cell line are shown. Similar results were obtained with the TAL-derived T-cell line.

In sum, our data provide direct evidence that high frequencies of CD4+ T cells specific for NY-ESO-1 are found at sites of ovarian cancers of patients with spontaneous immune responses to the antigen, where they coexist with high proportions of Treg. However, NY-ESO-1–specific CD4+ T cells in tumors are clearly distinct from Treg and exhibit instead characteristics of TH1 effectors. Because tumor-associated Treg are highly suppressive ex vivo, and despite the capacity of NY-ESO-1–specific TH1 cells to expand at tumor sites, it is likely that Treg still affect them and limit their full growth potential and/or effector functions, particularly in solid tumor tissues, where Treg are present in high numbers.

It is noteworthy that, because only a few MHC class II tetramers incorporating peptides from human tumor-specific antigens have been developed thus far, the data reported here represent the first direct ex vivo assessment of tumor antigen-specific CD4+ T cells at tumor sites of patients with spontaneous immune responses to a tumor-specific antigen. In our previous assessments of NY-ESO-1-tetramer+ cells in circulating CD4+ T lymphocytes from patients with cancer with spontaneous or vaccine-induced immune responses (15, 16), and, in this study, in tumor-associated CD4+ T cells, we have consistently failed to detect NY-ESO-1–specific Treg. Our results are at variance with those of other studies reporting that a fraction of NY-ESO-1–specific CD4+ T cells that spontaneously develop in patients with cancer or are induced through vaccination are Treg (18, 19). These studies, however, did not use ex vivo assessments by tetramers, but indirect strategies that may have confounded results and conclusions.

The origin and specificity of tumor-associated Treg is currently under debate. One study has proposed that accumulation of Treg in tumors is the consequence of an early recruitment/expansion at tumor sites of Treg specific for self-antigens (20) presumably of thymic origin (called natural or nTreg). Other studies, however, have suggested that the accumulation of Treg in tumors results from the local conversion of Tconv, including those directed against tumor-specific antigens, into induced Treg (iTreg; ref. 21). In line with the concept that Treg infiltrating ovarian cancers are mostly nTreg, we have recently reported that a large fraction of them express Helios, a transcription factor of the Ikaros family that has been proposed to distinguish nTreg from iTreg (5, 22). Interestingly, based on their comparison of the TCR sequences of tumor-infiltrating Treg in two different mouse models, Sainz-Perez and colleagues recently reported that Treg–Teff conversion is not an active process at tumor sites (23), a conclusion that is in line with the results of the present study.

Although our results do not rule out that iTreg specific for certain types of tumor-associated antigens, for example tissue differentiation antigens, could be represented among tumor-associated Treg, they nevertheless show that tumor-associated CD4+ T cells directed against a highly tumor-specific and immunogenic antigen such as NY-ESO-1 are largely distinct from tumor-associated Treg. The results of this study are highly relevant to the development of cancer immunotherapy in several respects. First, they show that CD4+ T cells that recognize highly specific tumor antigens can accumulate in tumors and, even in the presence of very high proportions of Treg, are not converted into Treg, but maintain instead an effector phenotype. These results therefore imply that vaccination strategies based on NY-ESO-1 or other tumor-specific and immunogenic antigens have a high potential for expanding antitumor effectors and not Treg in vivo, even when these cells migrate at tumor sites. On the other hand, because tumor antigen-specific CD4+ T effectors at tumor sites are distinct from Treg, our results suggest that a selective elimination of Treg, if achievable, would not erode the tumor antigen-specific component of antitumor immune responses, but could rather potentiate it, and contribute to remove the brakes that prevent antitumor effectors from completely eradicating tumor cells, in vivo.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design: M. Ayyoub, D. Valmori

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): P. Pignon, J.-M. Classe, K. Odunsi

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): M. Ayyoub, D. Valmori

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: M. Ayyoub, D. Valmori

Study supervision: M. Ayyoub, D. Valmori

Grant Support

The study was supported by the Cancer Research Institute, the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, and La Ligue contre le Cancer.

  • Received May 28, 2013.
  • Revision received August 9, 2013.
  • Accepted August 12, 2013.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Zhang L,
    2. Conejo-Garcia JR,
    3. Katsaros D,
    4. Gimotty PA,
    5. Massobrio M,
    6. Regnani G,
    7. et al.
    Intratumoral T cells, recurrence, and survival in epithelial ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;348:203–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Curiel TJ,
    2. Coukos G,
    3. Zou L,
    4. Alvarez X,
    5. Cheng P,
    6. Mottram P,
    7. et al.
    Specific recruitment of regulatory T cells in ovarian carcinoma fosters immune privilege and predicts reduced survival. Nat Med 2004;10:942–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Milne K,
    2. Kobel M,
    3. Kalloger SE,
    4. Barnes RO,
    5. Gao D,
    6. Gilks CB,
    7. et al.
    Systematic analysis of immune infiltrates in high-grade serous ovarian cancer reveals CD20, FoxP3 and TIA-1 as positive prognostic factors. PLoS ONE 2009;4:e6412.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Leffers N,
    2. Gooden MJ,
    3. de Jong RA,
    4. Hoogeboom BN,
    5. ten Hoor KA,
    6. Hollema H,
    7. et al.
    Prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating T-lymphocytes in primary and metastatic lesions of advanced stage ovarian cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2009;58:449–59.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Redjimi N,
    2. Raffin C,
    3. Raimbaud I,
    4. Pignon P,
    5. Matsuzaki J,
    6. Odunsi K,
    7. et al.
    CXCR3 +T regulatory cells selectively accumulate in human ovarian carcinomas to limit type I immunity. Cancer Res 2012;72:4351–60.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Valmori D,
    2. Dutoit V,
    3. Liénard D,
    4. Rimoldi D,
    5. Pittet M,
    6. Champagne P,
    7. et al.
    Naturally occurring HLA-A2 restricted CD8+ T cell response to the cancer testis antigen NY-ESO-1 in melanoma patients. Cancer Res 2000;60:4499–506.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Valmori D,
    2. Souleimanian NE,
    3. Tosello V,
    4. Bhardwaj N,
    5. Adams S,
    6. O'Neill D,
    7. et al.
    Vaccination with NY-ESO-1 protein and CpG in Montanide induces integrated antibody/Th1 responses and CD8 T cells through cross-priming. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104:8947–52.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Hunder NN,
    2. Wallen H,
    3. Cao J,
    4. Hendricks DW,
    5. Reilly JZ,
    6. Rodmyre R,
    7. et al.
    Treatment of metastatic melanoma with autologous CD4+ T cells against NY-ESO-1. N Engl J Med 2008;358:2698–703.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Rosenberg SA,
    2. Yang JC,
    3. Sherry RM,
    4. Kammula US,
    5. Hughes MS,
    6. Phan GQ,
    7. et al.
    Durable complete responses in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic melanoma using T-cell transfer immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 2011;17:4550–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Yuan J,
    2. Gnjatic S,
    3. Li H,
    4. Powel S,
    5. Gallardo HF,
    6. Ritter E,
    7. et al.
    CTLA-4 blockade enhances polyfunctional NY-ESO-1 specific T cell responses in metastatic melanoma patients with clinical benefit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:20410–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Pere H,
    2. Tanchot C,
    3. Bayry J,
    4. Terme M,
    5. Taieb J,
    6. Badoual C,
    7. et al.
    Comprehensive analysis of current approaches to inhibit regulatory T cells in cancer. Oncoimmunology 2012;1:326–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Simpson AJ,
    2. Caballero OL,
    3. Jungbluth A,
    4. Chen YT,
    5. Old LJ
    . Cancer/testis antigens, gametogenesis and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2005;5:615–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Odunsi K,
    2. Jungbluth AA,
    3. Stockert E,
    4. Qian F,
    5. Gnjatic S,
    6. Tammela J,
    7. et al.
    NY-ESO-1 and LAGE-1 cancer-testis antigens are potential targets for immunotherapy in epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Res 2003;63:6076–83.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Sato E,
    2. Olson SH,
    3. Ahn J,
    4. Bundy B,
    5. Nishikawa H,
    6. Qian F,
    7. et al.
    Intraepithelial CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and a high CD8+/regulatory T cell ratio are associated with favorable prognosis in ovarian cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102:18538–43.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Ayyoub M,
    2. Dojcinovic D,
    3. Pignon P,
    4. Raimbaud I,
    5. Schmidt J,
    6. Luescher I,
    7. et al.
    Monitoring of NY-ESO-1 specific CD4+ T cells using molecularly defined MHC class II/His-tag-peptide tetramers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:7437–42.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Redjimi N,
    2. Duperrier-Amouriaux K,
    3. Raimbaud I,
    4. Luescher I,
    5. Dojcinovic D,
    6. Classe JM,
    7. et al.
    NY-ESO-1-specific circulating CD4 T cells in ovarian cancer patients are prevalently T(H)1 type cells undetectable in the CD25FOXP3Treg compartment. PLoS ONE 2011;6:e22845.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Dunham RM,
    2. Cervasi B,
    3. Brenchley JM,
    4. Albrecht H,
    5. Weintrob A,
    6. Sumpter B,
    7. et al.
    CD127 and CD25 expression defines CD4+ T cell subsets that are differentially depleted during HIV infection. J Immunol 2008;180:5582–92.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Ebert LM,
    2. MacRaild SE,
    3. Zanker D,
    4. Davis ID,
    5. Cebon J,
    6. Chen W
    . A cancer vaccine induces expansion of NY-ESO-1-specific regulatory T cells in patients with advanced melanoma. PLoS ONE 2012;7:e48424.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Fourcade J,
    2. Sun Z,
    3. Kudela P,
    4. Janjic B,
    5. Kirkwood JM,
    6. El-Hafnawy T,
    7. et al.
    Human tumor antigen-specific helper and regulatory T cells share common epitope specificity but exhibit distinct T cell repertoire. J Immunol 2010;184:6709–18.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Darrasse-Jeze G,
    2. Bergot AS,
    3. Durgeau A,
    4. Billiard F,
    5. Salomon BL,
    6. Cohen JL,
    7. et al.
    Tumor emergence is sensed by self-specific CD44hi memory Tregs that create a dominant tolerogenic environment for tumors in mice. J Clin Invest 2009;119:2648–62.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Heiber JF,
    2. Geiger TL
    . Context and location dependence of adaptive Foxp3(+) regulatory T cell formation during immunopathological conditions. Cell Immunol 2012;279:60–5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Thornton AM,
    2. Korty PE,
    3. Tran DQ,
    4. Wohlfert EA,
    5. Murray PE,
    6. Belkaid Y,
    7. et al.
    Expression of Helios, an Ikaros transcription factor family member, differentiates thymic-derived from peripherally induced Foxp3+ T regulatory cells. J Immunol 2010;184:3433–41.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Sainz-Perez A,
    2. Lim A,
    3. Lemercier B,
    4. Leclerc C
    . The T-cell receptor repertoire of tumor-infiltrating regulatory T lymphocytes is skewed toward public sequences. Cancer Res 2012;72:3557–69.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Back to top
Cancer Immunology Research: 1 (5)
November 2013
Volume 1, Issue 5

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
CD4+ T Effectors Specific for the Tumor Antigen NY-ESO-1 Are Highly Enriched at Ovarian Cancer Sites and Coexist with, but Are Distinct from, Tumor-Associated Treg
Maha Ayyoub, Pascale Pignon, Jean-Marc Classe, Kunle Odunsi and Danila Valmori
Cancer Immunol Res November 1 2013 (1) (5) 303-308; DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0062-T
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Advertisement