Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

AACR logo

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Cancer Immunology Essentials
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • "Best of" Collection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

  • AACR Publications
    • Blood Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Immunology Research
Cancer Immunology Research
  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Cancer Immunology Essentials
    • Collections
      • COVID-19 & Cancer Resource Center
      • "Best of" Collection
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • Editors' Picks
    • OnlineFirst
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
    • RSS Feeds
    • My Alert Summary & Preferences
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • COVID-19
  • Webinars
  • Search More

    Advanced Search

Priority Brief

Increased Frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T Cells as a Pharmacodynamic Biomarker for Anti-CTLA-4 Therapy

Derek Ng Tang, Yu Shen, Jingjing Sun, Sijin Wen, Jedd D. Wolchok, Jianda Yuan, James P. Allison and Padmanee Sharma
Derek Ng Tang
1Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, 2Biostatistics, and 3Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; 4Department of Biostatistics, West Virginia University Health Science Center, Morgantown, West Virginia; and 5Department of Medicine and 6Ludwig Center for Cancer Immunotherapy, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yu Shen
1Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, 2Biostatistics, and 3Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; 4Department of Biostatistics, West Virginia University Health Science Center, Morgantown, West Virginia; and 5Department of Medicine and 6Ludwig Center for Cancer Immunotherapy, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jingjing Sun
1Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, 2Biostatistics, and 3Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; 4Department of Biostatistics, West Virginia University Health Science Center, Morgantown, West Virginia; and 5Department of Medicine and 6Ludwig Center for Cancer Immunotherapy, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sijin Wen
1Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, 2Biostatistics, and 3Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; 4Department of Biostatistics, West Virginia University Health Science Center, Morgantown, West Virginia; and 5Department of Medicine and 6Ludwig Center for Cancer Immunotherapy, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jedd D. Wolchok
1Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, 2Biostatistics, and 3Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; 4Department of Biostatistics, West Virginia University Health Science Center, Morgantown, West Virginia; and 5Department of Medicine and 6Ludwig Center for Cancer Immunotherapy, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
1Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, 2Biostatistics, and 3Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; 4Department of Biostatistics, West Virginia University Health Science Center, Morgantown, West Virginia; and 5Department of Medicine and 6Ludwig Center for Cancer Immunotherapy, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jianda Yuan
1Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, 2Biostatistics, and 3Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; 4Department of Biostatistics, West Virginia University Health Science Center, Morgantown, West Virginia; and 5Department of Medicine and 6Ludwig Center for Cancer Immunotherapy, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James P. Allison
1Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, 2Biostatistics, and 3Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; 4Department of Biostatistics, West Virginia University Health Science Center, Morgantown, West Virginia; and 5Department of Medicine and 6Ludwig Center for Cancer Immunotherapy, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Padmanee Sharma
1Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, 2Biostatistics, and 3Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; 4Department of Biostatistics, West Virginia University Health Science Center, Morgantown, West Virginia; and 5Department of Medicine and 6Ludwig Center for Cancer Immunotherapy, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
1Departments of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, 2Biostatistics, and 3Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; 4Department of Biostatistics, West Virginia University Health Science Center, Morgantown, West Virginia; and 5Department of Medicine and 6Ludwig Center for Cancer Immunotherapy, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0020 Published October 2013
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article has a correction. Please see:

  • Correction: Increased Frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T Cells as a Pharmacodynamic Biomarker for Anti-CTLA-4 Therapy - May 1, 2014

Abstract

Pharmacodynamic biomarkers can play an important role in understanding whether a therapeutic agent has “hit its target” to impact biologic function. A pharmacodynamic biomarker for anti-CTLA-4 therapy remains to be elucidated. We previously reported that anti-CTLA-4 therapy increases the frequency of CD4 T cells expressing the inducible costimulator (ICOS) molecule. To determine whether the frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T cells could be used as a pharmacodynamic biomarker for anti-CTLA-4 therapy, we carried out flow cytometric studies and statistical analyses on data from 56 individuals, which included 10 healthy donors, 36 patients who received anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody (mAb), and 10 patients who received treatment with a different immunomodulatory agent (gp100 DNA vaccine). After treatment with anti-CTLA-4 mAb (ipilimumab; Bristol-Myers Squibb), we detected a statistically significant increase in the frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T-cells. After two doses of anti-CTLA-4 therapy, the assay was found to have an estimated specificity of 96% [95% confidence interval (CI), 88–100] and sensitivity of 71% (95% CI, 54–85), with positive expression defined as a frequency that is more than the upper bound of 95% CI among baseline samples from all subjects. Our data suggest that an increased frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T cells measured by flow cytometry can be used as a reproducible pharmacodynamic biomarker to indicate biologic activity in the setting of anti-CTLA-4 therapy, which should enable appropriate immune monitoring to determine whether patients receiving anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy or combination treatment strategies are having an adequate biologic response. Cancer Immunol Res; 1(4); 229–34. ©2013 AACR.

Introduction

Cytotoxic lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) is an inhibitory coreceptor expressed on T cells and acts to attenuate T-cell immune responses (1–3). Blockade of CTLA-4 with a monoclonal antibody (mAb) has been shown to enhance T-cell responses and induce tumor rejection in a number of animal models (4, 5). Ipilimumab (Bristol-Myers Squibb), a mAb to human CTLA-4, has been found to elicit objective responses in clinical trials (6–10) and was shown to improve median overall survival of patients with metastatic melanoma in two different phase III clinical trials (11, 12).

In a presurgical clinical trial in which anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab) was administered to patients with localized bladder cancer, we previously reported a significant increase in the frequency of T cells expressing the inducible costimulator (ICOS) molecule in both tumor tissues and blood samples obtained from patients. (13, 14) We subsequently reported that a sustained increase in the frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T cells was correlated with clinical benefit in a small cohort of patients with melanoma who received anti-CTLA-4 therapy (15). We also found that loss of the ICOS/ICOS-ligand pathway in a murine model led to impaired antitumor immune responses and tumor rejection (16). Another study, with a different anti-CTLA-4 antibody (tremelimumab; Pfizer), also reported an increase in ICOS+ CD4 T cells in blood samples obtained from patients with breast cancer (17). Collectively, these data indicated a biologically relevant role for ICOS in antitumor responses elicited by anti-CTLA-4 therapy.

ICOS is a T-cell–specific molecule that belongs to the CD28/CTLA-4 family (18, 19) and is expressed only after T-cell activation. As anti-CTLA-4 enhances T-cell activation, we hypothesized that ICOS expression on CD4 T cells could be used as a pharmacodynamic biomarker for anti-CTLA-4 therapy. To determine whether ICOS expression on CD4 T cells measured by flow cytometry could be used as a pharmacodynamic biomarker for anti-CTLA-4 therapy (ipilimumab), we analyzed blood samples from 56 individuals, consisting of 10 healthy donors, 36 patients who received ipilimumab (12 patients with bladder cancer and 24 patients with melanoma), and 10 patients with melanoma who received treatment with a different immunomodulatory agent (gp100 DNA vaccine).

Materials and Methods

Normal healthy donors and cancer patients

Blood samples were collected after normal healthy donors provided informed consent on The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX) Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved laboratory protocol 2005-0027. Blood samples from patients with cancer were obtained after they provided consent on IRB-approved protocols such that patients with bladder cancer were consented as per protocols 2006-0080 and 2005-0027, as previously published (13, 15), and patients with melanoma were either consented on the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY) IRB-approved biospecimen collection protocols 95-090 or 00-144 before treatment with ipilimumab (NCT00495066), as previously published (15), or protocol 06-113 for treatment with gp100 DNA vaccine (NCT00398073), as previously published (20).

Blood processing

All blood samples were collected from the clinic and transported at room temperature within 3 hours after being drawn from each individual. Whole blood was collected in Vacutainer tubes containing sodium heparin (BD Vacutainer). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated from whole blood by density gradient centrifugation using Lymphocyte Separation Medium (Mediatech) and Leucosep tubes (Greiner Bio-one). In brief, whole blood was centrifuged at 410 × g for 10 minutes and the plasma layer was collected, centrifuged for 10 minutes at 885 × g, and the supernatant frozen at −80°C for subsequent experiments. The whole blood was diluted 1:1 with RPMI (Mediatech) and the PMBCs isolated per manufacturer's guidelines. Cells at the interface were harvested and washed once with RPMI, and red blood cells were lysed with ammonium chloride lysis buffer. Cells were washed, counted, and immediately used fresh for staining and flow cytometry analysis as previously described (13), or 10 million PBMCs were frozen per milliliter of freezing solution (10% DMSO 10% FBS-supplemented RPMI) per NUNC cryovial. PBMCs were frozen in a Nalgene Cryo 1°C freezing container per manufacturer's instructions and stored in liquid nitrogen thereafter.

In vitro activation

PBMCs were resuspended at 1.5 × 106 cells/mL in RPMI (Mediatech) supplemented with MEM nonessential amino acids, 2 mmol/L l-glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, and 10% human AB serum (Life Technologies); 30 × 106 PBMCs were added to appropriate T25 tissue culture flask (Corning). PMBCs were activated for 48 hours with immobilized anti-CD3 5 μg/mL clone UCHT1 and soluble anti-CD28 2 μg/mL clone CD28.2 (BD Biosciences). PBMCs were collected after detachment from the flask with 4 mmol/L NaEDTA and washed twice with PBS + 2% FBS, followed immediately by labeling for flow cytometry or freezing as above for approximately 24 hours before labeling for flow cytometry.

Flow cytometry

Antibodies used for flow cytometry analysis were CD4 PerCP Cy5.5 (BD Biosciences), ICOS PE-Cy7 (eBioscience), and FoxP3-PE. Lineage was excluded using a cocktail of FITC-conjugated antibodies, CD303 (Miltenyi Biotec), CD20, CD16, CD14, CD56, TCR γδ, and CD19 (BD Biosciences). Triplicate samples were analyzed using the FACSCanto II (Becton Dickinson). Data were analyzed using the BD FACSDiva software. Gates were set according to appropriate isotype controls. D.N. Tang and J. Sun conducted studies independently.

Statistical analyses

Summary statistics such as mean, median, SD, and 95% confidence interval (CI) were provided for the frequency of CD4+ICOS+ T cells. The histograms and bar plots were used to display ICOS expressions by different subject group. Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired data was used to assess the difference on the frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T cells between prior and posttreatment. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was also used to assess the difference on the frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T cells at baseline between donor controls and patients with different tumor types. All P values presented are two-sided. P values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Statistical analyses were carried out using SPLUS 7 (Insightful Corp).

Results

ICOS expression on CD4 T cells was consistently increased after patients received treatment with anti-CTLA-4

In a subset of 3 to 6 patients with bladder cancer who received two doses of anti-CTLA-4 and for whom PBMCs were available, we evaluated multiple potential pharmacodynamic biomarkers, including expression of ICOS, HLA-DR, and CD25 on CD4 T-cells; frequency of total CD4 and CD8 T-cell populations; and absolute lymphocyte count. As shown in Table 1, an increased frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T cells was consistently found after patients received treatment with dose 1 and dose 2 of anti-CTLA-4. However, we did not observe a consistent change in the other 5 evaluated biomarkers after patients received treatment with two doses of anti-CTLA-4. These data suggested that ICOS expression on CD4 T cells was a reasonable biomarker to further pursue as a potential pharmacodynamic biomarker for anti-CTLA-4 therapy.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Evaluation of six different immunologic parameters in patients treated with anti-CTLA-4

Flow cytometric studies can reproducibly measure frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T cells

Because we found that anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab) led to an increased frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T cells, which was due to enhanced T-cell activation, we conducted studies to determine whether in vitro activation with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 would also lead to an increased frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T cells. We conducted in vitro activation with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 on human PBMCs obtained from normal healthy donors to determine whether our flow cytometric assay could reliably detect a change in ICOS expression on CD4 T cells. We found that in vitro activation of human PBMCs led to a detectable increase in ICOS+ CD4 T cells (Supplementary Fig. S1), which was similarly observed for 10 different donors (Supplementary Table S1).

To determine whether our flow cytometric assay was reproducible, we obtained blood samples from 3 healthy donors on 3 different days and evaluated frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T cells before and after in vitro activation for both fresh and frozen samples. Blood was obtained from donors on 3 separate days, and samples were evaluated by two independent operators before and after activation either immediately (fresh) or after being frozen for 24 hours (Fig. 1, representative donor). Blood samples from 2 additional healthy donors were also obtained on 3 separate days and underwent similar analyses (Supplementary Table S2). Each donor sample was tested in triplicate, and the coefficient of variation was found to be less than 20% for the two operators (Supplementary Table S2). In addition, we evaluated the intra-assay variability on triplicate samples studied at each timepoint for 6 patients who received treatment with anti-CTLA-4 and found that the coefficient of variation was less than 10% (Supplementary Table S3). These data indicate that ICOS expression on CD4 T cells could be reproducibly detected by flow cytometric analyses.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Flow cytometric studies can reproducibly measure frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T cells. Peripheral blood from a single individual was drawn on 3 different days, and cells were unactivated (control) or activated in vitro before two different operators performed flow cytometry to evaluate frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T cells on fresh or frozen samples.

An increase in the frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T cells is specific for anti-CTLA-4 therapy

To determine whether there were any differences in the frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T cells in samples obtained from normal healthy donors as compared with baseline (pretherapy) samples obtained from patients with cancer, we compared data from a cohort of normal healthy donors (n = 10) to pretherapy data obtained from patients with localized bladder cancer (n = 12) and patients with metastatic melanoma (n = 34; 24 patients who would receive treatment with ipilimumab and 10 patients who would receive treatment with gp100 DNA vaccine). As shown in Table 2, there was not a statistically significant difference in the frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T cells at baseline among these cohorts. However, after treatment with anti-CTLA-4, the frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T cells significantly increased in patients with localized bladder cancer and metastatic melanoma (P ≤ 0.004). Patients who were treated with a different immunomodulatory agent, gp100 DNA vaccine, did not show a statistically significant change in the frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T cells (P = 0.92; Table 3). We used the upper bound of 95% CI obtained from the baseline samples (n = 56) to define a positive test for the frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T cells as more than 5.63. On the basis of this threshold, flow cytometric analysis for the frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T cells as a pharmacodynamic biomarker for ipilimumab therapy provided an average specificity of 96% (95% CI, 88–100) and sensitivity of 71% (95% CI, 54–85) after administration of two doses of anti-CTLA-4 (Table 4).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T cells from normal healthy donors and baseline blood samples from cancer patients

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T cells in pre- and posttherapy samples after treatment with anti-CTLA-4

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4.

Sensitivity and specificity of ICOS+ CD4 T cells as a pharmacodynamic biomarker of anti-CTLA-4 therapy

Discussion

Pharmacodynamic biomarkers are markers of drug effect that usually encompass the pathway associated with the molecular target or represent downstream consequences of target and pathway modulation. In the case of anti-CTLA-4 therapy, the mAb blocks the inhibitory CTLA-4 molecule and prevents interactions between CTLA-4 and its ligand (B7), which subsequently enables B7 to be free for interactions with CD28, a critical costimulatory molecule for T-cell activation (21, 22). Therefore, anti-CTLA-4 therapy leads to enhanced T-cell activation. Upon T-cell activation, ICOS expression is upregulated (18, 23); therefore, ICOS can serve as a marker of T-cell activation. We were the first to report that anti-CTLA-4 therapy (ipilimumab) led to an increase in the frequency of ICOS+ T cells in patients with cancer (13–15). Subsequently, another group found an increase in the frequency of ICOS+ T cells after patients with cancer were treated with a different anti-CTLA-4 antibody, tremelimumab (17). In this study, we tested the hypothesis that an increased frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T cells detected by flow cytometry can be used as a pharmacodynamic biomarker for anti-CTLA-4 therapy. We showed 96% specificity and 71% sensitivity for flow cytometric measurement of an increased frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T cells after treatment with anti-CTLA-4.

Although we present data to show that the frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T cells can serve as a pharmacodynamic biomarker for anti-CTLA-4 therapy, it should be noted that ICOS+ T cells also play an important role in the antitumor response mediated by anti-CTLA-4 therapy. We have previously shown that mice lacking ICOS or its ligand (ICOSL) have impaired antitumor responses after treatment with anti-CTLA-4, as compared with wild-type mice (16). Therefore, based on the clear relationship between T-cell activation and upregulation of ICOS expression, as well as the biologic role of the ICOS/ICOSL pathway in mediating antitumor immune responses, we propose that ICOS expression on CD4 T cells represents a valid biomarker to be further developed in the setting of anti-CTLA-4 therapy.

Anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab) is currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma. In addition, because anti-CTLA-4 targets a T-cell–specific molecule, as opposed to a tumor-specific molecule, it is being tested in multiple clinical trials in patients with different malignancies, which will require appropriate development of biomarkers for anti-CTLA-4 therapy. Also, because preclinical data suggest that combination therapies with agents that prime a T-cell response plus anti-CTLA-4 are more effective at eliciting antitumor responses as compared with monotherapy (24–26), clinical trials are under way with anti-CTLA-4 in various combination strategies, which will require appropriate biomarker development to evaluate whether the combination maintains biologic efficacy of anti-CTLA-4. Given the number of clinical trials that are ongoing or are expected to be conducted with anti-CTLA-4 antibody, appropriate biomarkers are clearly needed to enable rational decisions regarding dose, schedule, and combinations. Here, we define an increased frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T cells measured by flow cytometry as a pharmacodynamic biomarker that can be measured in blood samples, which can potentially be used for making decisions regarding different doses, schedules, and/or combinations tested in clinical trials with anti-CTLA-4. Our work represents a small retrospective analysis and warrants further prospective studies in a larger cohort of patients.

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

J.D. Wolchok has a commercial research grant and is a consultant/advisory board member for Bristol-Myers Squibb. J.P. Allison has ownership interest (including patents) in Bristol-Meyers Squibb and is a consultant/advisory board member for Kite Pharmceuticals and Jounce Therapeutics. P. Sharma has ownership interest (including patents) in Jounce and is a consultant/advisory board member for Bristol-Myers Squibb and MedImmune. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors.

Authors' Contributions

Conception and design: P. Sharma

Development of methodology: D.N. Tang, J. Yuan, P. Sharma

Acquisition of data (provided animals, acquired and managed patients, provided facilities, etc.): D.N. Tang, J.D. Wolchok, J. Yuan, P. Sharma

Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): D.N. Tang, Y. Shen, J. Sun, S. Wen, J. Yuan, J.P. Allison, P. Sharma

Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: D.N. Tang, Y. Shen, J. Sun, S. Wen, J.D. Wolchok, J. Yuan, J.P. Allison, P. Sharma

Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): D.N. Tang, Y. Shen

Study supervision: J.D. Wolchok, P. Sharma

Grant Support

This work was supported in part by a UTMDACC Physician-Scientist Program Award, a Career Development Award from the UTMDACC Bladder Cancer SPORE, a Melanoma Research Alliance Young Investigator Award, a Doris Duke Clinical Scientist Development Award, and an American Cancer Society Mentored Research Scholar Grant (all to P. Sharma). Bristol-Myers Squibb sponsored and funded the clinical trials with ipilimumab. The work of P. Sharma, J.D. Wolchok, and J.P. Allison is supported by a Stand Up To Cancer – Cancer Research Institute Cancer Immunology Translational Cancer Research Grant (SU2C-AACR-DT1012). Stand Up To Cancer is a program of the Entertainment Industry Foundation administered by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Footnotes

  • Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Immunology Research Online (http://cancerimmunolres.aacrjournals.org/).

  • Received February 22, 2013.
  • Revision received June 5, 2013.
  • Accepted July 4, 2013.
  • ©2013 American Association for Cancer Research.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Walunas TL,
    2. Lenschow DJ,
    3. Bakker CY,
    4. Linsley PS,
    5. Freeman GJ,
    6. Green JM,
    7. et al.
    CTLA-4 can function as a negative regulator of T-cells activation. Immunity 1994;1:405–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Krummel MF,
    2. Allison JP
    . CD28 and CTLA-4 have opposing effects on the response of T-cells to stimulation. J Exp Med 1995;182:459–65.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Krummel MF,
    2. Allison JP
    . CTLA-4 engagement inhibits IL-2 accumulation and cell cycle progression upon activation of resting T-cells. J Exp Med 1996;183:2533–40.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Leach DR,
    2. Krummel MF,
    3. Allison JP
    . Enhancement of antitumor immunity by CTLA-4 blockade. Science 1996;271:1734–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  5. 5.↵
    1. van Elsas A,
    2. Hurwitz AA,
    3. Allison JP
    . Combination immunotherapy of B16 melanoma using anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-producing vaccines induces rejection of subcutaneous and metastatic tumors accompanied by autoimmune depigmentation. J Exp Med 1999;190:355–66.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Hodi FS,
    2. Mihm MC,
    3. Soiffer RJ,
    4. Haluska FG,
    5. Butler M,
    6. Seiden MV,
    7. et al.
    Biologic activity of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 antibody blockade in previously vaccinated metastatic melanoma and ovarian carcinoma patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:4712–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Phan GQ,
    2. Yang JC,
    3. Sherry RM,
    4. Hwu P,
    5. Topalian SL,
    6. Schwartzentruber DJ,
    7. et al.
    Cancer regression and autoimmunity induced by cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 blockade in patients with metastatic melanoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:8372–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Korman A,
    2. Yellin M,
    3. Keler T
    . Tumor immunotherapy: preclinical and clinical activity of anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 2005;6:582–91.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Saenger YM,
    2. Wolchok JD
    . The heterogeneity of the kinetics of response to ipilimumab in metastatic melanoma: patient cases. Cancer Immun 2008;8:1–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Small EJ,
    2. Tchekmedyian S,
    3. Rini BI,
    4. Fong L,
    5. Lowy I,
    6. Allison JP
    . A pilot trial of CTLA-4 blockade with human anti-CTLA-4 in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:1810–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Hodi FS,
    2. O'Day SJ,
    3. McDermott DF,
    4. Weber RW,
    5. Sosman JA,
    6. Haanen JB,
    7. et al.
    Improved survival with Ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med 2010;363:711–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Robert C,
    2. Thomas L,
    3. Bondarenko I,
    4. O'Day S,
    5. Weber J,
    6. Garbe C,
    7. et al.
    Ipilimumab plus Dacarbazine for previously untreated metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med 2011;364:2517–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Liakou CI,
    2. Kamat A,
    3. Ng Tang D,
    4. Chen H,
    5. Sun J,
    6. Troncoso P,
    7. et al.
    CTLA-4 blockade increases IFNγ -producing CD4+ICOShi cells to shift the ratio of effector to regulatory T-cells in cancer patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:14987–92.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Chen H,
    2. Liakou CI,
    3. Kamat A,
    4. Pettaway C,
    5. Ward JF,
    6. Ng Tang D,
    7. et al.
    Anti-CTLA-4 therapy results in higher CD4+ICOShi T-cells frequency and IFN-γ levels in both nonmalignant and malignant prostate tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106:2729–34.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Carthon BC,
    2. Wolchok JD,
    3. Yuan J,
    4. Kamat A,
    5. Ng Tang DS,
    6. Sun J,
    7. et al.
    Preoperative CTLA-4 blockade: tolerability and immune monitoring in the setting of a presurgical clinical trial. Clin Cancer Res 2010;16:2861–71.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Fu T,
    2. He Q,
    3. Sharma P
    . The ICOS/ICOSL pathway is required for optimal antitumor responses mediated by anti-CTLA-4 therapy. Cancer Res 2011;71:5445–54.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Vonderheide RH,
    2. LoRusso PM,
    3. Khalil M,
    4. Gartner EM,
    5. Khaira D,
    6. Soulieres D,
    7. et al.
    Tremelimumab in combination with Exemestane in patients with advance breast cancer and treatment-associated modulation of inducible costimulator expression on patient T-cells. Clin Cancer Res 2010;16:3485–94.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Hutloff A,
    2. Dittrich AM,
    3. Beier KC,
    4. Eljaschewitsch B,
    5. Kraft R,
    6. Anagnostopoulos I,
    7. et al.
    ICOS is an inducible T-cells co-stimulator structurally functionally related CD28. Nature 1999;397:263–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Dong C,
    2. Juedes AE,
    3. Temann U,
    4. Shresta S,
    5. Allison JP,
    6. Ruddle NH,
    7. et al.
    ICOS co-stimulatory receptor is essential for T-cells activation and function. Nature 2001;409:97–101.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Ginsberg BA,
    2. Gallardo HF,
    3. Rasalan TS,
    4. Adamow M,
    5. Mu Z,
    6. Tandon S,
    7. et al.
    Immunologic response to xenogeneic gp100 DNA in melanoma patients: comparison of particle-mediated epidermal delivery with intramuscular injection. Clin Cancer Res 2010;16:4057–65.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Lenschow DJ,
    2. Walunas TL,
    3. Bluestone JA
    . CD28/B7 System of T-cells co-stimulation. Annu Rev Immunol 1996;14:233–58.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Chambers CA,
    2. Allison JP
    . Co-stimulatory regulation of T-cells function. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1999;11:203–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Yoshinaga SK,
    2. Whoriskey JS,
    3. Khare SD,
    4. Sarmiento U,
    5. Guo J,
    6. Horan T,
    7. et al.
    T-cells co-stimulation through B7RP-1 and ICOS. Nature 1999;402:827–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Hurwitz AA,
    2. Foster BA,
    3. Kwon ED,
    4. Truong T,
    5. Choi EM,
    6. Greenberg NM,
    7. et al.
    Combination immunotherapy of primary prostate cancer in a transgenic mouse model using CTLA-4 blockade. Cancer Res 2000;60:2444–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Quezada SA,
    2. Peggs KS,
    3. Curran MA,
    4. Allison JP
    . CTLA4 blockade and GM-CSF combination immunotherapy alters the intratumor balance of effector and regulatory T-cells. J Clin Invest 2006;116:1935–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Dewan MZ,
    2. Galloway AE,
    3. Noriko Kawashima N,
    4. Dewyngaert JK,
    5. Babb JS,
    6. Formenti SC,
    7. et al.
    Fractionated but not single-dose radiotherapy induces an immune-mediated abscopal effect when combined with anti–CTLA-4 antibody. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:5379–88.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Immunology Research: 1 (4)
October 2013
Volume 1, Issue 4
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Immunology Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Increased Frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T Cells as a Pharmacodynamic Biomarker for Anti-CTLA-4 Therapy
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Immunology Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Immunology Research.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Increased Frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T Cells as a Pharmacodynamic Biomarker for Anti-CTLA-4 Therapy
Derek Ng Tang, Yu Shen, Jingjing Sun, Sijin Wen, Jedd D. Wolchok, Jianda Yuan, James P. Allison and Padmanee Sharma
Cancer Immunol Res October 1 2013 (1) (4) 229-234; DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Increased Frequency of ICOS+ CD4 T Cells as a Pharmacodynamic Biomarker for Anti-CTLA-4 Therapy
Derek Ng Tang, Yu Shen, Jingjing Sun, Sijin Wen, Jedd D. Wolchok, Jianda Yuan, James P. Allison and Padmanee Sharma
Cancer Immunol Res October 1 2013 (1) (4) 229-234; DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0020
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
    • Authors' Contributions
    • Grant Support
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • CD47–SIRPα Checkpoint Controls CD18 Activation via Kindlin3
  • Triple Therapy Depletes Immune-Potentiating Myeloid Cells
  • Inducing CTLs through DLnano-vaccines to Target Cancer
Show more Priority Brief
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Cancer Immunology Essentials

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians

About Cancer Immunology Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Immunology Research
eISSN: 2326-6074
ISSN: 2326-6066

Advertisement