Skip to main content
  • AACR Publications
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Cancer Immunology Essentials
    • Collections
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • OnlineFirst
    • Editors' Picks
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
  • AACR Publications
    • Cancer Discovery
    • Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
    • Cancer Immunology Research
    • Cancer Prevention Research
    • Cancer Research
    • Clinical Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Research
    • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Cancer Immunology Research
Cancer Immunology Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • About
    • The Journal
    • AACR Journals
    • Subscriptions
    • Permissions and Reprints
    • Reviewing
  • Articles
    • OnlineFirst
    • Current Issue
    • Past Issues
    • Meeting Abstracts
    • Cancer Immunology Essentials
    • Collections
      • Editors' Picks
  • For Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Author Services
    • Best of: Author Profiles
    • Submit
  • Alerts
    • Table of Contents
    • OnlineFirst
    • Editors' Picks
    • Citation
    • Author/Keyword
  • News
    • Cancer Discovery News
Review

NKG2D ligands as therapeutic targets

Paul Spear, Ming-Ru Wu, Marie-Louise Sentman and Charles L. Sentman
Paul Spear
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ming-Ru Wu
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marie-Louise Sentman
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles L. Sentman
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI:  Published January 2013
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The Natural Killer Group 2D (NKG2D) receptor plays an important role in protecting the host from infections and cancer. By recognizing ligands induced on infected or tumor cells, NKG2D modulates lymphocyte activation and promotes immunity to eliminate ligand-expressing cells. Because these ligands are not widely expressed on healthy adult tissue, NKG2D ligands may present a useful target for immunotherapeutic approaches in cancer. Novel therapies targeting NKG2D ligands for the treatment of cancer have shown preclinical success and are poised to enter into clinical trials. In this review, the NKG2D receptor and its ligands are discussed in the context of cancer, infection, and autoimmunity. In addition, therapies targeting NKG2D ligands in cancer are also reviewed.

This article was published in Cancer Immunity, a Cancer Research Institute journal that ceased publication in 2013 and is now provided online in association with Cancer Immunology Research.

Introduction

Innate immune cells recognize antigens through germline-encoded receptors and possess the ability to discriminate between self and non-self through three distinct mechanisms (1). In non-self recognition, innate leukocytes recognize conserved products of microbes not expressed by the host. In this strategy, innate leukocytes are capable of distinguishing between infectious non-self and non-infectious self. In a second strategy, recognition of “missing self ” requires detection of normal self-proteins to prevent self-reactivity and attack of healthy cells. These self-proteins are specific to the host and are absent from pathogens. Recognition of altered-self constitutes a third mechanism. Innate immune cells detect markers of “abnormal self ” that are upregulated due to infection or cellular transformation. The NKG2D receptor functions to recognize cells expressing induced self-proteins. Exploiting NKG2D-mediated recognition of altered self presents a method to target tumors or pathogen-infected cells.

NKG2D receptor

Expression

NKG2D is a C-type, lectin-like, type II transmembrane glycoprotein whose transcript was initially discovered in human natural killer (NK) and T cells (2, 3). Almost all NK cells in both mouse and humans express NKG2D (4). Contrary to human CD8+ T cells that constitutively express NKG2D, mouse CD8+ T cells only express the receptor after activation (4). Subsequent analyses demonstrated that the NKG2D receptor is expressed on natural killer T(NKT) cells, γδ T cells, activated mouse macrophages, and a small subset of CD4+ T cells (5). Only a small population of mouse CD4+ T cells naturally express NKG2D, and its expression on peripheral CD4+ T cells is not upregulated after T cell receptor (TCR) engagement (4). In addition, about 25% of spleen γδ T cells in the mouse express NKG2D, and it is almost ubiquitously expressed on dendritic epidermal T cells in the skin, but not by intestinal intraepithelial γδ T cells (4). Almost all peripheral blood γδ T cells in humans express NKG2D, while intestinal intraepithelial γδ T cells express low amounts of NKG2D, which is upregulated in response to IL-15 stimulation (6, 7). The expression of NKG2D is not restricted to mice and humans, and it is expressed by other mammals including rats, swine, canines, chimpanzees, and macaques.

Signaling

NKG2D, like many activating receptors, associates with an adaptor molecule to initiate signal transduction and cellular activation (Figure 1). A positively charged arginine in the transmembrane domain of NKG2D associates with a negatively charged aspartic acid in the transmembrane domain of the adaptor molecule DNAX-activating protein of 10 kDa (DAP10) (8). Although many adaptor molecules contain a cytoplasmic immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM) that mediates cell signaling, DAP10 contains a YXXM tyrosine-based motif that is similar to a motif found in the co-stimulatory molecules CD28 and ICOS (9). The YXXM motif of DAP10 recruits and activates the p85 subunit of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3-K) and growth factor receptor-bound protein 2 (Grb2) (9, 10). NKG2D forms a complex with DAP10 that required to stabilize NKG2D on the cell surface (8, 9, 11). Each NKG2D homodimer associates with two homodimers of DAP10 to form a hexameric structure (8). In humans, NKG2D exclusively associates with DAP10, but two isoforms of NKG2D exist in mice as a result of alternative splicing. Activated mouse NK cells express a shorter splice-variant of NKG2D that lacks 13 amino acids in the N-terminus of the cytoplasmic domain. Unlike the longer version of NKG2D that solely binds to DAP10, NKG2D-S can bind to DAP10 or another signal transducing protein, DNAX-activating protein of 12 kDa (DAP12) (12, 13). DAP12 contains an ITAM that recruits ZAP70 and Syk to mediate NK cell activation (12, 14). NKG2D acts as a primary activation signal for NK cells and can override inhibitory signals received by other NK cell receptors (12, 13, 15). However, NKG2D receptor engagement on CD8+ T cells functions as a co-stimulatory signal by amplifying T cell activation through the TCR (15).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

NKG2D receptor association with adaptor molecules and expression by leukocytes. The NKG2D receptor forms a homodimer that associates with two homodimers of the adaptor molecules DAP10 or DAP12 through interaction of a positively-charged amino acid in the transmembrane domain of NKG2D with a negatively-charged residue in the transmembrane domain of either adaptor molecule. The association of NKG2D with adaptor molecules is determined by the isoform of NKG2D expressed. Mouse and human NK cells, αβ T cells, γδ T cells, and NKT cells express a longer isoform of NKG2D that associates with DAP10. However, mouse NK cells also express a shorter splice variant of NKG2D that associate with DAP12. Upon ligand engagement, NKG2D initiate cell signaling cascades via these adaptor molecules. The DAP10-associated form of NKG2D activates PI3K and Grb2/Vav, while the DAP12-associated form activates SYK and ZAP70. NKG2D receptor engagement acts a primary activation signal for NK cells but as a co-stimulatory-type signal on T cells.

Regulation of NKG2D receptor expression

Many factors regulate the amount of NKG2D expressed on the cell surface. The expression and availability of DAP10 and DAP12 affect NKG2D cell surface expression because the receptor requires association with these molecules for cell surface expression. In addition, gamma-chain cytokines such as IL-2, IL-7, IL-12, and IL-15 increase cell surface expression of NKG2D in human and mouse NK and CD8+ T cells (16-18). IL-15 signaling not only regulates NKG2D expression, but increases the expression of DAP10 and phosphorylates the adaptor molecule to prime NKG2D signaling (19). Cytokines can also decrease NKG2D expression. IL-21, IFN-γ, and TGF-β have been shown to decrease NKG2D expression (20-22). High amounts of IFN-γ decrease NKG2D expression and impair NKG2D-mediated lysis of target cells (23). IL-21 has been shown to reduce expression of DAP10 and NKG2D in human CD8+ T cells and NK cells. In mice, IL-21 stimulation of murine NK cells does not regulate NKG2D expression, and this may be due to the pairing of NKG2D with DAP12 in NK cells, which may not be regulated by IL-21 (21). Similarly, TGF-β decreases NKG2D expression, but this can be reversed after NK cells are exposed to IL-2 or IL-18 (24).

NKG2D ligands

Species specificities of NKG2D and its ligands

NKG2D ligands were discovered by treating the embryonic testicular teratoma cell line F9 with retinoic acid, which induced expression of the mouse ligand Rae-1 (25). There are currently five known members of the Rae-1 family of mouse NKG2D ligands (Rae-1α, Rae-1β, Rae-1γ, Rae-1δ, Rae-1ε). In addition, the H60 family of NKG2D ligands contains three members (H60a, H60b, H60c), while murine UL16-binding protein-like transcript 1 (MULT1) is the only member of the third family of mouse ligands. Two families of NKG2D ligands have been identified in humans. MHC class I chain-related protein A (MICA) and B (MICB) and HCMV UL16-binding proteins (ULBP1-6) are recognized by the human NKG2D receptor. All six ULBP family members are officially named RAET1 genes and are orthologs of the mouse Raet1 genes. Although these ligands are distant HLA class I homologues, they do not associate with β-2 microglobulin and play no known role in antigen presentation. NKG2D ligands, especially MIC genes, are highly polymorphic (26). MICA shares only 15-40% amino acid sequence identity with MHC and is encoded on the MHC locus (27). Thus, MICA alleles may be associated with specific HLA haplotypes because of linkage disequilibrium. Similar to the highly polymorphic MHC locus, there are over 60 and 20 alleles of the MICA and MICB genes, respectively (26-28). There is also evidence of polymorphism in the human RAET1 genes and mouse Raet1 and H60 genes (29, 30). These allelic variants bind to NKG2D with varying affinities which may affect the threshold of NK cell triggering and T cell activation. MIC sequences have been identified in rhesus macaques that code for three genes: MIC1, MIC2, and MIC3 (31, 32). Phylogenetic analysis of these genes indicates that these are not orthologs of human MICA or MICB genes, and that they appeared to have evolved after the separation of human rhesus monkeys from a common ancestor. In addition, these alleles display polymorphism: six MIC1, five MIC2, and three MIC3 alleles have been identified (33). The RAET1 proteins are also highly polymorphic in primates. Twenty-five alleles of RAET1E/ULBP4 have been identified in the rhesus monkey (34). In chimpanzees, data suggest that MICA has been deleted and that other primates contain MICD and MICE (35). NKG2D ligands have been identified in many species and appear to serve a similar function, but there are significant differences between the ligands in protein sequence, receptor affinity, and expression patterns.

NKG2D ligand structure and binding

Human and mouse NKG2D ligands are structural homologs of MHC class I molecules. All ligands consist of two ectodomains that are distantly related to the α1 and α2 domains of the MHC class I protein. Unlike other ligands, MICA and MICB contain an α3-like domain in addition to the α1 and α2 domains (36). NKG2D displays varying affinities for its ligands (Table 1). It has the highest affinity for the murine ligand Mult1 (KD = .004 μM), but the affinity of NKG2D for all of its ligands is about 0.02 to 1 μM, which is roughly ten-fold higher than the affinity of many immunoreceptor-ligand interactions. For example, the inhibitory receptor CTLA-4 binds to its ligand CD80 with an affinity of 0.4 μM.

Table 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1

Affinity of NKG2D and other immunoreceptors.

Expression of NKG2D ligands by tumor cells

Many tumor cell lines and primary tumors from diverse tissue origins express NKG2D ligands. Human ULBP proteins are expressed by primary leukemia, glioma, and melanoma tumor cells (Table 2) (37-39). Almost all primary glioma isolates expressed MICA and ULBP1-3, but there was little expression of MICB on primary glioma (38). In addition, many primary tumor isolates from carcinoma (lung, breast, kidney, prostate, ovary, and colon), melanoma, and some primary leukemia cells express MICA (37-42). About 75% of primary cutaneous melanoma isolates and 50% of metastatic melanoma lesions express MICA protein (42). Moreover, human myeloma cells and over 80% of primary ovarian carcinoma cells express NKG2D ligands (43-45). NKG2D ligands on primary tumor isolates are heterogeneous with respect to the ligands found and amounts expressed, and ligand expression can also vary with tumor progression. Ovarian carcinoma cells express low amounts of the NKG2D ligands MICA, ULBP1, and ULBP3, whereas ULBP2 was more highly expressed (43). NKG2D ligands were highly expressed in lymph node metastasis of stage I colorectal cancer samples, but they were expressed in lower amounts in Stage II, III, or IV tumors (46). Higher expression of MICA in colorectal cancer patients was associated with a good prognosis (41).

Table 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2

Expression of NKG2D ligands on human tumor cells.

Regulation of NKG2D ligand expression

The presence of NKG2D ligands on tumor cells but not on healthy tissue implicated cellular transformation in the upregulation of ligands. It was hypothesized that oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes involved in the process of transformation may regulate NKG2D ligand expression. However, the loss of the tumor suppressor p53 in ovarian epithelial cells, as well as forced expression of combinations of the oncogenes Kras, c-myc, or the serine/threonine kinase AKT did not regulate NKG2D ligand expression (47). The expression of NKG2D ligands can be regulated by the ATM/ATR (ataxia telangiectasia mutated/ATM- and Rad3-related) DNA damage repair pathway, but cytokine exposure and TLR stimulation may also induce NKG2D ligand transcription. Following DNA damage, the PI3-K-related proteins ATM and ATR initiate a DNA damage response. Double-stranded breaks preferentially activate ATM, while stalled DNA replication induces ATR activity. The DNA damage response has been shown to be constitutively active in advanced tumors, as well as in precancerous and early cancerous lesions, but not in healthy tissue (48, 49). Inhibiting the ATM DNA damage pathway in these murine epithelial ovarian tumor cell line T2 decreased Rae-1 expression, demonstrating the role of the DNA damage response in maintaining NKG2D ligand expression on tumor cells (47). In addition, DNA damaging agents and replication inhibitors, such as 5’Fluorouracil and cisplatin, can also induce NKG2D protein expression in an ATM/ATRdependent manner (47). Other conventional cancer treatments, such as local ionizing radiation therapy, can upregulate expression of the mouse NKG2D ligand Rae-1 on breast carcinoma cells (Figure 2) (50). Several pharmacological drugs have been shown to induce expression of NKG2D ligands. Treatment of cell lines with the proteasome inhibitor Bortezomib (Velcade) can increase cell surface expression of NKG2D ligands. Inhibiting the proteasome has also been shown to increase ULBP2 expression, resulting in increased killing by NK cells (51). However, it is uncertain if proteasome inhibitors upregulate NKG2D ligands via DNA damage repair pathways. Inhibition of the ATM/ATR signaling pathway with caffeine did not prevent proteasome inhibitor drug-induced ULBP1 expression, indicating that inhibition of the proteasome regulates ULBP1 expression independent of the ATM/ATR DNA damage repair pathway (52).Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors have also been shown to induce DNA damage and increase expression of NKG2D ligands on tumor cells (53-55). Treatment with HDAC inhibitors resulted in increased recognition of cancer cells by cytotoxic lymphocytes via NKG2D (53, 54). Ewing’s sarcoma cells treated with an HDAC inhibitor upregulated NKG2D ligands in an ATM/ATR-dependent manner, which resulted in increased sensitivity to NK cell lysis (56). It has also been demonstrated that in vivo treatment with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) or the HDAC inhibitor valproic acid in patients affected with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) led to the induction of transcription and expression of NKG2D ligands on the surface of leukemic cells (57). The tyrosine kinase receptor HER3 was also shown to regulate the expression of MICA and MICB in breast cancer cell lines (58). Similar to proteasome inhibitors, inhibition of the ATM/ATR DNA damage repair pathway with caffeine did not affect HER3 regulation of MIC expression.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Induction of NKG2D ligand expression by cancer treatments and immunotherapies targeting these ligands. (top) NKG2D ligand expression increases after treatment with DNA-damage-inducing chemotherapies. In addition, local ionizing radiation or inhibition of the proteasome increases ligand expression on tumor cells. (bottom) Immunotherapies have been engineered to specifically target NKG2D ligands in cancer. NKG2D-based chimeric antigen receptor T cells express NKG2D fused to the intracellular signaling molecule CD3ζ. Upon recognition of NKG2D ligand-expressing tumor cells, NKG2D-CAR T cells lyse tumor cells through perforin/granzyme and secrete effector cytokines that modulate the tumor microenvironment. To enhance activation of T cells or NK cells, bispecific proteins targeting NKG2D ligands on tumor cells or activating NKG2D on effector cells have been developed. These bispecific proteins promote lysis of tumor cells through perforin-granzyme and secretion of effector cytokines. Targeting tumor cells with anti-NKG2D ligand monoclonal antibody therapy promotes antigen-presenting cell cross-presentation of tumor antigens to activate endogenous T cells. Moreover, anti-NKG2D ligand mAbs can promote ADCC of tumor cells by NK cells (NK), neutrophils (PMN), or macrophages (MØ) through Fc receptors. In addition to directly targeting tumor cells, therapies targeting NKG2D ligands can also eliminate regulatory leukocyte populations at the tumor site (i.e., MDSCs and Tregs).

Moreover, TLR signaling has been reported to induce transcription of NKG2D ligands. TLR4 and TLR7/8 agonists, but not TLR3 agonists, upregulated MIC proteins on human macrophages (59). TLR signaling through MyD88 adaptor has been shown to upregulate transcription of Rae1, but not H60 or Mult1 (59, 60). Cytokines can exert differential effects on the regulation of NKG2D ligands. Melanoma cells exposed to IFN-γ downregulate MICA and ULBP2, and IFN-γ reduces expression of mouse H60 on sarcomas (61, 62). In addition, TGF-β decreases the transcription of MICA, ULBP2, and ULBP4 on human glioma (63). The expression of NKG2D ligands has also been shown to be regulated by estradiol. Endometrial cells exposed to estradiol upregulated MICA protein (64). The MICA promoter contains an estrogen receptor response element suggesting that estrogen may increase MICA expression through transcriptional regulation.

NKG2D ligand regulation may also be mediated by posttranscriptional mechanisms. Micro-RNA encoded by human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) and overexpressed in some tumors can downregulate MICA and MICB expression by binding the 3’ untranslated region (UTR) of MICA and MICB (65, 66). In the same study, it was also demonstrated that a group of endogenous micro-RNAs expressed in various human tissues and cells regulated MICA and MICB through the same mechanism (65). The effect of IFN-γ on NKG2D ligand expression may also be due to micro-RNA regulation. It has been shown that IFN-γ induces miR-520b which decreases MICA transcription by binding the 3’ UTR and the MICA promoter region (67). It has also been shown that the tumor suppressive micro-RNA miR-34a/c targets the 3’ UTR of ULBP2, and that the amount of mir-34 inversely correlates with the amount of ULBP2 expressed on the cell surface (68). In addition to posttranscriptional micro-RNA regulation, NKG2D ligands can be degraded post-translation. Mult1 transcripts have been shown to be highly expressed in some tissues but the protein undergoes ubiquitination and lysosomal degradation under normal conditions that prevent cell surface expression (69). These posttranscriptional regulatory mechanisms suggest that NKG2D ligands can be continually synthesized but concomitantly degraded in healthy tissue to maintain minimal cell surface ligand expression. However, regulation of the degradation process by cellular stress and transformation may be responsible for the increase in NKG2D ligand cell surface expression on infected and transformed cells. It has been shown that Mult1 cell surface expression increases after heat shock or ultraviolet stress, and that these stress responses affect ligand expression by regulating the rate of Mult1 degradation (69).

Expression of NKG2D ligands on normal cells

It is hypothesized that NKG2D ligand expression is tightly regulated in healthy adult tissue to prevent self-recognition and autoimmune reactivity. However, mRNA for these ligands is expressed in early embryos and can be detected in normal cells in some cases. NKG2D ligand transcripts were found to be expressed in the brain of embryos from 129/J mice, but transcript could not be detected post-birth (70). In humans, ULBP transcripts were also detected in the fetal brain, heart, lung, and liver (71). In healthy adult tissue isolated from mice, H60a and H60b mRNA are expressed at low levels, while the expression of H60c is restricted to the skin (72). Healthy cardiac, skeletal, spleen, liver, thymus, and skin tissue express transcript for the H60a ligand in BALB/c mice, but not in C57BL/6 mice (72). In addition, Mult1 mRNA was detected in healthy adult tissue of C57BL/6 mice (73). Similar to Mult1, ULBP transcripts in humans appear to be widely expressed in healthy adult tissue (71). ULBP transcripts were detected in the kidney, prostate, uterus, tonsil, and lymph node tissues of healthy adults (71). However, immunohistochemistry showed that most human tissues (heart, brain, liver, thyroid, lung, skin, kidney, placenta, adrenal gland, tonsil, and spleen) do not express MICA, but gastric and glandular epithelial cells do express MICA (36). Subsequent studies determined that most MIC-positive epithelial cells expressed the protein intracellularly (74). Although mRNA for NKG2D ligands is detected in healthy tissues isolated from the mouse embryo and adult tissue, data suggest that posttranscriptional regulation prevents the translation and cell surface expression of these proteins.

Expression of NKG2D ligands and self-reactivity

Recent evidence has linked the NKG2D receptor and its ligands to some autoimmune diseases. Because NKG2D receptor and ligand expression are regulated by inflammatory stimuli, sustained inflammation induced by autoreactive immune responses may contribute to NKG2D ligand expression in these tissues. Blocking the NKG2D receptor during the pre-diabetic stage in NOD mice prevented the development of diabetes (75). Because autoreactive CD8+ T cells were shown to express the NKG2D receptor and infiltrate the pancreas, it was proposed that NKG2D blockade prevented the function of autoreactive CD8+ T cells in this mouse model. NKG2D ligands have been detected on the pancreatic islets of pre-diabetic NOD mice, but age-matched BALB/c mice did not express Rae1 or other NKG2D ligands (75). Thus, the role of NKG2D in the development of type I diabetes (T1D) mellitus may be NOD strain-specific. In humans, MICA has been positively associated with human T1D through genetic linkage studies (76). It was shown that MICA polymorphisms can confer either protection or susceptibility to T1D, and that the MICA5 allele is associated with increased susceptibility to T1D when found in combination with permissive HLA class II alleles (77). In addition, MICA protein has been shown to be expressed in higher amounts in small intestine mucosa of celiac disease patients compared to healthy donors (74). In one study, intra-epithelial CTLs isolated from celiac patients expressed higher amounts of NKG2D receptor, and receptor expression correlated with enhanced CTL lysis of MICA-expressing targets (78). The intraepithelial CTLs isolated from celiac patients lysed ligand-expressing targets independent of the TCR. However, Hue et al. found that CD8+ intraepithelial T cell lines isolated from celiac disease patients stimulated through the NKG2D receptor alone did not lyse MICA-expressing target cells in a redirected lysis assay (74). Rather, NKG2D stimulation enhanced lysis of MICA-expressing target cells only in combination with suboptimal TCR stimulation. Because intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) stimulated through the TCR alone mediated lysis, these data indicate that NKG2D ligands are not the primary target in celiac disease. In alopecia areata, ULBP3 was shown to be expressed on dermal sheath of the hair follicle in alopecia patients, and CD8+ NKG2D+ T cells were shown to infiltrate the hair follicle (79). However, the precise role of NKG2D in alopecia remains to be determined. In adult rheumatoid arthritis (RA), CD4+ T cells in the blood have been shown to express higher amounts of NKG2D, and proliferating synoviocytes upregulate MICA and MICB (80). In contrast, NKG2D-expressing CD4+ T cells have been shown to be immunosuppressive and their presence in juvenile onset lupus erythematosus has been shown to inversely correlate with disease activity (81). In addition, a recent study demonstrated a lack of correlation between the CD4+ NKG2D+ T cell population and RA, indicating that the NKG2D receptor may not play an integral role in RA (82).

The role of NKG2D and its ligands in autoimmune disease is complicated by linkage disequilibrium. The requirement for a certain MICA allele to be found in combination with a specific MHC allele when associated with T1D suggests that NKG2D ligands may play a secondary role in autoimmune type I diabetes, and that the disease may be MHC driven. Because MIC genes are encoded on the MHC locus, certain MHC alleles may be linked more frequently to specific MIC alleles. Therefore, when a particular MIC allele is associated with a disease, it may be the MIC gene itself or the linked MHC gene that is primarily responsible for the disease association. For example, the MICA5 allele confers susceptibility to type I diabetes, but only when inherited with permissive MHC alleles (77). Moreover, specific MHC haplotypes have been identified that are associated with autoimmune type I diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, and celiac disease (83). The MIC alleles may play a secondary role in potentiating autoimmune inflammation after disease initiation, explaining the association with autoimmune reactivity. Blocking the NKG2D receptor after the initiation of an autoimmune response may then be a potential strategy to break the inflammatory cascade that results in healthy tissue destruction. NKG2D blockade reduced disease severity in mildly colitic mice and attenuated colitis development when given prophylactically (84). However, NKG2D blockade during advanced stages of colitis had no effect on disease severity. These results suggest that NKG2D blockade may inhibit inflammatory cascades that promote self-reactivity, but that recognition of NKG2D ligands are not sufficient to induce disease.

NKG2D ligands in infection

NKG2D ligands can be upregulated during some bacterial and viral infections. The upregulation of ligands may be critical in alerting the immune response to infection, and may play a role in viral clearance since NK cells and CD8+ T cells express NKG2D and are often important effector cells in immunity against these pathogens. Pulmonary epithelial cells infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa upregulated NKG2D ligands, and pulmonary clearance of the bacteria was dependent on NKG2D (85, 86). Escherichia coli and Mycobacterium tuberculosis rapidly increased MICA expression on the surface of intestinal epithelial cells and Rae-1; expression on macrophages, respectively (87, 88). The upregulation of MICA after E. coli infection was dependent on the binding of the bacterial adhesion AfaE to CD55 on epithelial cells. The rapid induction of ligands after AfaE binding is consistent with stress-induced signaling. Similarly, HIV infection induces ULBP expression on CD4+ T cell blasts (89). The HIV vpr gene product activated the DNA damage pathway and was sufficient to induce ligand expression. In addition, human dendritic cells(DCs) infected with influenza virus upregulated ULBP1-3 but not MICA or MICB (90). NKG2D ligands may be upregulated on antigen-presenting cells (APCs) after stimulation with pathogen-derived Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands. LPS and poly I:C have been shown to increase NKG2D ligand expression on macrophages (60, 91-93). It has been shown that NKG2D ligands can be sequestered intracellularly during HCMV and adenovirus infections, and that HCMV impairs NK cell activation by preventing IFN-α-induced MICA and MICB upregulation on DCs (94-96). VSV, HSV, HCMV, and adenovirus infections have been shown to downregulate NKG2D ligand expression on infected cells (94-98). During HCMV infection, the UL16 glycoprotein selectively retains MICB, ULBP1, and ULBP2 in the endoplasmic reticulum and prevents cell surface expression (94, 99, 100). Infection with a UL16 deletion mutant virus resulted in NKG2D ligand upregulation on infected cells, and enhanced NK cell killing of infected targets in a NKG2Ddependent manner (100). In addition, HSV infection reduced cell surface expression of NKG2D ligands, but not the total cellular MICA content, suggesting masking, internalization, or retention of these ligands (98). Thus, targeting NKG2D ligands during some pathogen infections may promote destruction of pathogen-infected cells and clearance.

Immune evasion of NKG2D-mediated immunity

In the transgenic adenocarcinoma of the mouse prostate (TRAMP) model of spontaneous prostate adenocarcinoma, early tumors arising in mice deficient in the NKG2D receptor expressed higher amounts of NKG2D ligands compared to tumors in NKG2D-intact mice (101). However, tumor cells from mice bearing B cell lymphoma expressed heterogeneous NKG2D ligand expression in the presence or absence of NKG2D (101). These data suggest that NKG2D participates in tumor surveillance and eliminates NKG2D ligand-positive tumor cells in early tumor development in some tumor models. However, many primary tumor isolates from established tumors express MIC protein, so it is hypothesized that tumors employ mechanisms to evade NKG2D-mediated immune detection (40, 102). The release of MIC protein from the surface of tumor cells into the circulation is one mechanism hypothesized to prevent NKG2D-mediated tumor destruction (102). Soluble MIC protein has been identified in many human tumor types including breast, lung, colon, and ovarian carcinoma, glioma, neuroblastoma, leukemia, and melanoma (38, 39, 102-105). A correlation between the presence of soluble MICA in the sera of MICA-expressing tumors and the level of NKG2D downregulation on tumor infiltrating and peripheral CD8+ T cells has been shown (103). However, the sera of tumor patients contain factors that can regulate NKG2D ligand expression independent of soluble MICA. TGF-β has also been shown to decrease the transcription of MICA, ULBP2, and ULBP4 on human glioma (63). The presence of TGF-β can also downregulate NKG2D receptor expression on effector cells, and blocking TGF-β can lead to increased NKG2D expression regardless of soluble MICA present in the serum (106-108). Moreover, a mouse model created to express human MICA under the constitutive mouse H-2Kb promoter demonstrated that NKG2D receptor downregulation was not mediated by soluble MICA, but was primarily a result of persistent exposure to membrane-bound MICA (109). It is possible that soluble NKG2D ligands bind to the NKG2D receptor and prevent its interaction with membrane-bound ligands without downregulating NKG2D receptor expression. However, cytokine stimulation of cells may overcome receptor inhibition mediated by soluble ligands (24, 80). In addition, the amount of soluble MICA detected in the serum of patients with diverse cancer types is often 0.1-10 ng/ml (39, 105). The mean concentration of soluble MICA in serum from tumor-bearing patients was 228 pg/ml compared to 90 pg/ml in healthy controls (105). It was found that soluble-MIC protein downregulated NKG2D receptor expression at supraphysiological levels (100 ng/ml) (110). Although soluble MIC proteins may impair therapies targeting NKG2D ligands by immunotherapy, evidence suggests that immune effector cells are capable of eliminating NKG2D ligand-expressing tumor cells and inducing a host anti-tumor immune response (111, 112). Selective drug therapies as part of cancer treatment may also promote NKG2Dmediated tumor destruction by inducing ligand expression or reducing the cleavage of MIC proteins from the surface of tumor cells (50, 51, 53-56, 113).

The tumor microenvironment and leukocyte-mediated evasion of NKG2D-mediated anti-tumor immunity

Leukocytes within the tumor microenvironment can regulate NKG2D-mediated anti-tumor immunity. T regulatory cells (Tregs) can inhibit NK cell cytolytic function and IFN-γ secretion, and Tregs have been shown to downregulate NKG2D on human and mouse NK cells through membrane-bound TGF-β (114). In a study by Smyth et al., depletion of Tregs resulted in the rejection of NK cell-sensitive tumors (115). In addition, NKG2D-expressing CD8+ T cells promoted elimination of B16 tumors after treatment with anti-41BB and anti-CD4 mAb to deplete regulatory T cells (116). Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) have also been shown to downregulate NKG2D expression and impair the cytotoxic ability of NK cells via membrane-bound TGF-β (114). However, MDSC play a dual role in anti-tumor immunity and can promote NK cell activation through NKG2D. In some tumor models, MDSC express NKG2D ligands and induce IFN-γ production in a NKG2D-dependent manner (117, 118). It has also been shown that CD4+ FOXP3+ T cells at the tumor site but not in the spleen of mice bearing ovarian carcinoma or melanoma express NKG2D ligands, and that adaptive Tregs in cultures of human monocytes with M. tuberculosis express NKG2D ligands (118-120). NKG2D ligand expression on suppressive leukocyte populations in the tumor microenvironment indicates that NKG2D recognition may not only promote direct tumor cell lysis but may also relieve immunosuppression through lysis of regulatory leukocyte populations.

Immunotherapies targeting NKG2D ligands

Adoptive therapies transferring effector cells into tumor-bearing recipients have demonstrated therapeutic potential. NK cells, αβ T cells, γδ T cells, and NKT cells express NKG2D, and activated cells transfused into tumor-bearing recipients may induce anti-tumor immune responses and tumor destruction (121-125). Adoptive transfer of γδ T cells expressing NKG2D into patients with non-small cell lung cancer did not result in adverse events in a phase I trial (126). The ex vivo expansion of human PBMCs with IL-2 resulted in the outgrowth of CD8+, NKG2D+ T effector cells that lysed myeloma cells independent of their TCR (45). It was demonstrated that the cytotoxicity of these CD8+ T cells against myeloma cells was NKG2D-dependent. Because NKG2D is expressed on many transferred effector cells and can recognize its ligands on tumor cells, it is possible that NKG2D may play a part in the anti-tumor effects of adoptively transferred lymphocytes. However, direct investigation of NKG2D function was not performed in these studies. In addition, combination treatment using NKG2D-based immunotherapies with other novel immunotherapeutics or conventional treatments may improve clinical outcomes. NKG2D has been shown to contribute to anti-tumor responses elicited by IL-2 and IL-12 cytokine therapy, as well as CTLA-4 inhibitory receptor blockade (50, 127, 128). Moreover, certain drugs used in conventional treatment regimens (i.e., HDAC inhibitors, bortezomib) have been shown to upregulate NKG2D ligands on tumor cells (47, 54, 129). Therefore, irradiation, chemotherapy, or immunotherapies used in conjunction with NKG2D-based therapies may enhance tumor elimination through upregulation of NKG2D ligands on tumor cells or through activation of effector cells that eliminate the tumor through NKG2D. Because it is possible that these therapeutic agents and therapies may transiently upregulate NKG2D ligands on healthy tissue by inducing DNA damage, understanding the therapeutic window and timing of NKG2D-based therapies may be critical for safety. The expression of NKG2D ligands on many primary tumor cells makes it an attractive target for the development of novel therapeutics (Figure 2).

Engineering T cells with a chimeric NKG2D receptor

The use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells to target specific molecules on tumors has the potential to lead to long-term improved outcomes in cancer patients. Targeting NKG2D ligands with T cells engineered to express a NKG2D CAR has been shown to induce tumor elimination and long-term tumor-free survival in RMA lymphoma, ID8 ovarian carcinoma, and 5T33MM multiple myeloma (112, 130, 131). The NKG2D CAR expressing T cells consist of the full-length NKG2D receptor fused to CD3ζ and associates with DAP10. This CAR design leaves the natural NKG2Dligand interaction and spatial dynamics between the effector and target cells intact. T cells transduced to express the NKG2D-based CAR recognize NKG2D ligands expressed on tumor cells through the CAR receptor and independent of the TCR. The NKG2D CAR signals through CD3ζ and DAP10 (132). These T cells lyse NKG2D ligand-positive tumor cells and secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines following activation (130, 133). Complete tumor elimination mediated by transfusion of NKG2D CAR T cells was not only dependent on direct killing by the transferred T cells, but also on the activation of host anti-tumor immunity (112, 130, 134). IFN-γ and GM-CSF produced by the adoptively transferred T cells transformed the tumor microenvironment from immunosuppressive to immunostimulatory and activated host lymphocytes for optimal tumor elimination (119, 130, 134, 135). In addition, treatment with NKG2D CAR T cells induced the development of a host tumor-specific T cell memory response that was capable of protecting mice from a tumor rechallenge (112, 131). Moreover, transfer of NKG2D CAR T cells has been shown to target regulatory leukocyte populations at the tumor site. CD4+ FOXP3+ T cells in the ovarian carcinoma model expressed NKG2D ligands, and transfusion of NKG2D CAR T cells reduced the number of these cells in a perforin-dependent mechanism (119). MDSC have also been shown to upregulate NKG2D ligands in some tumor models (118). Elimination of regulatory leukocyte populations may enhance NKG2D CAR T cell-mediated anti-tumor effects. Although the presence of soluble NKG2D ligands may block the receptor, the cytolytic activity of NKG2D CAR T cells was not inhibited by physiological levels of soluble MICA protein (136). Lehner et al. engineered a T cell to express a CAR receptor consisting of the NKG2D ectodomain in reverse orientation fused to a CD3ζ and CD28 signaling platform. This NKG2D ligand-binding CAR enhanced T cell cytotoxicity against sarcoma tumor cell lines in vitro (137).

Bispecific protein therapies targeting NKG2D and NKG2D ligands

A few therapies utilizing single-chain fragment variable regions to target NKG2D or its ligands have shown therapeutic potential. A ULBP2-BB4 bispecific protein increased the susceptibility of multiple myeloma cell lines to NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity and enhanced the elimination of a xenograft tumor when combined with adoptive transfer of peripheral blood lymphocytes (138). It was shown that ULBP2 binds to the NKG2D receptor while BB4 simultaneously binds to CD138, which is overexpressed in multiple myeloma and on other tumor cells. In addition, a NKG2D/anti-CD3 scFv bispecific protein was shown to promote regression of RMA-RG lymphoma and B16F10 melanoma tumors in vivo (118). The NKG2D-CD3 scFv binds NKG2D ligands on tumor cells and CD3 on T cells. The host anti-tumor immune response initiated by NKG2D/anti-CD3 scFv treatment was required for tumor elimination and sustained protection from cognate tumor rechallenge. Moreover, NKG2D-CD3 scFv treatment reduced the number of local CD4+ FOXP3+ Tregs and Gr1+ MDSC in B16F10 melanoma-bearing mice (118).

Targeting soluble MICA

Patients treated with anti-CTLA-4 antibody blockade or vaccinated with autologous tumor cells engineered to express GM-CSF generated high-titer anti-MICA antibodies that were associated with enhanced therapeutic efficacy by relieving immunosuppression and stimulating anti-tumor cytotoxicity (128). The high-titer anti-MICA antibodies were associated with lower amounts of circulating soluble MICA and enhanced tumor cell opsonization and cross-presentation by DCs. These findings indicate that monoclonal anti-MICA antibody therapy may promote tumor elimination by neutralizing circulating MICA while simultaneously stimulating CTL activity by enhancing DC cross-presentation of tumor antigens. However, anti-MICA antibodies may also block NKG2D on effector cells from binding to NKG2D ligands on tumor cells.

Conclusion

NKG2D ligands present an attractive target for therapy. The potential expression of ligands on healthy tissue during infection and autoimmune inflammation are safety concerns. Unlike many cellular-based therapies that attempt to increase persistence of the transferred cells in vivo, NKG2D-targeted effector cells that persist long-term may have on-target but unwanted effects by reacting with ligands expressed on other tissues during inflammation or infection. Chronic inflammation and local cell death may invoke processes that induce NKG2D ligand expression at these sites and may contribute to pathology. However, the expression of these ligands on tumor cells from diverse origins make targeting NKG2D ligands an attractive therapy that may be broadly used in the treatment of many tumor types. The fact that cell-based NKG2D therapies recognize the target ligands independent of the MHC complex is also an advantage. The MHC-independent recognition of target cells allows the transferred effector cells to respond to tumor cells that evade immune detection through downregulation of MHC and enables these therapies to be used irrespective of MHC haplotype. Effectively harnessing the potent anti-tumor function of the NKG2D receptor while minimizing adverse effects due to ligand expression on healthy tissue will be the therapeutic hurdle for NKG2D-based cancer therapies as they enter into the clinic. Yet, the preclinical success and broad applicability of these therapies to many types of tumors offer great promise for the treatment of cancer.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health CA130911 and T32-AI007363. The views in this paper reflect the authors’ opinions and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the National Institutes of Health.

Competing interests: The chimeric NKG2D technology mentioned in this review is licensed to Celdara Medical LLC. CLS and Celdara are developing the technology for clinical use. If they are successful, CLS will receive compensation. The arrangement is under compliance with Dartmouth College.

  • Copyright © 2013 by Charles L. Sentman

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Medzhitov R,
    2. Janeway CA Jr.
    . Decoding the patterns of self and nonself by the innate immune system. Science 2002; 296:298–300. pmid:11951031
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Yabe T,
    2. McSherry C,
    3. Bach FH,
    4. Fisch P,
    5. Schall RP,
    6. Sondel PM,
    7. Houchins JP
    . A multigene family on human chromosome 12 encodes natural killer-cell lectins. Immunogenetics  1993; 37:455–460. pmid:8436421
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Houchins JP,
    2. Yabe T,
    3. McSherry C,
    4. Bach FH
    . DNA sequence analysis of NKG2, a family of related cDNA clones encoding type II integral membrane proteins on human natural killer cells. J Exp Med 1991; 173: 1017–1020. pmid:2007850
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Jamieson AM,
    2. Diefenbach A,
    3. McMahon CW,
    4. Xiong N,
    5. Carlyle JR,
    6. Raulet DH
    . The role of the NKG2D immunoreceptor in immune cell activation and natural killing. Immunity 2002; 17:19–29. pmid:12150888
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Raulet DH
    . Roles of the NKG2D immunoreceptor and its ligands. Nature Rev Immunol  2003; 3: 781–790. pmid:14523385
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Bauer S,
    2. Groh V,
    3. Wu J,
    4. Steinle A,
    5. Phillips JH,
    6. Lanier LL,
    7. Spies T
    . Activation of NK cells and T cells by NKG2D, a receptor for stress-inducible MICA. Science  1999; 285: 727–729. pmid:10426993
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Roberts AI,
    2. Lee L,
    3. Schwarz E,
    4. Groh V,
    5. Spies T,
    6. Ebert EC,
    7. Jabri B
    . NKG2D receptors induced by IL-15 costimulate CD28-negative effector CTL in the tissue microenvironment. J Immunol 2001; 167:5527–5530. pmid:11698420
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Garrity D,
    2. Call ME,
    3. Feng J,
    4. Wucherpfennig KW
    . The activating NKG2D receptor assembles in the membrane with two signaling dimers into a hexameric structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102: 7641–7646. pmid:15894612
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Wu J,
    2. Song Y,
    3. Bakker AB,
    4. Bauer S,
    5. Spies T,
    6. Lanier LL,
    7. Phillips JH
    . An activating immunoreceptor complex formed by NKG2D and DAP10. Science  1999; 285: 730–732. pmid:10426994
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Upshaw JL,
    2. Arneson LN,
    3. Schoon RA,
    4. Dick CJ,
    5. Billadeau DD,
    6. Leibson PJ
    . NKG2D-mediated signaling requires a DAP10-bound Grb2-Vav1 intermediate and phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase in human natural killer cells. Nat Immunol  2006; 7:524–532. pmid:16582911
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Ogasawara K,
    2. Lanier LL
    . NKG2D in NK and T cell-mediated immunity. J Clin Immunol  2005; 25: 534–540. pmid:16380817
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Gilfillan S,
    2. Ho EL,
    3. Cella M,
    4. Yokoyama WM,
    5. Colonna M
    . NKG2D recruits two distinct adapters to trigger NK cell activation and costimulation. Nat Immunol 2002; 3:1150–1155. pmid:12426564
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Diefenbach A,
    2. Tomasello E,
    3. Lucas M,
    4. Jamieson AM,
    5. Hsia JK,
    6. Vivier E,
    7. Raulet DH
    . Selective associations with signaling proteins determine stimulatory versus costimulatory activity of NKG2D. Nat Immunol  2002; 3:1142–1149. pmid:12426565
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. McVicar DW,
    2. Taylor LS,
    3. Gosselin P,
    4. Willette-Brown J,
    5. Mikhael AI,
    6. Geahlen RL,
    7. Nakamura MC,
    8. Linnemeyer P,
    9. Seaman WE,
    10. Anderson SK,
    11. Ortaldo JR,
    12. Mason LH
    . DAP12-mediated signal transduction in natural killer cells. A dominant role for the Syk protein-tyrosine kinase. J Biol Chem  1998; 273:32934–32942. pmid:9830044
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Groh V,
    2. Rhinehart R,
    3. Randolph-Habecker J,
    4. Topp MS,
    5. Riddell SR,
    6. Spies T
    . Costimulation of CD8alphabeta T cells by NKG2D via engagement by MIC induced on virus-infected cells. Nat Immunol 2001; 2: 255–260. pmid:11224526
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Dhanji S,
    2. Teh HS
    . IL-2-activated CD8+CD44high cells express both adaptive and innate immune system receptors and demonstrate specificity for syngeneic tumor cells. J Immunol 2003; 171:3442–3450. pmid:14500639
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.
    1. Maasho K,
    2. Opoku-Anane J,
    3. Marusina AI,
    4. Coligan JE,
    5. Borrego F
    . NKG2D is a costimulatory receptor for human naive CD8+ T cells. J Immunol  2005; 174: 4480–4484. pmid:15814668
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Zhang C,
    2. Zhang J,
    3. Niu J,
    4. Zhou Z,
    5. Zhang J,
    6. Tian Z
    . Interleukin-12 improves cytotoxicity of natural killer cells via upregulated expression of NKG2D. Hum Immunol  2008; 69: 490–500. pmid:18619507
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Horng T,
    2. Bezbradica JS,
    3. Medzhitov R
    . NKG2D signaling is coupled to the interleukin 15 receptor signaling pathway. Nat Immunol 2007; 8: 1345–1352. pmid:17952078
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Burgess SJ,
    2. Maasho K,
    3. Masilamani M,
    4. Narayanan S,
    5. Borrego F,
    6. Coligan JE
    . The NKG2D receptor: immunobiology and clinical implications. Immunol Res  2008; 40: 18–34. pmid:18193361
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Takaki R,
    2. Hayakawa Y,
    3. Nelson A,
    4. Sivakumar PV,
    5. Hughes S,
    6. Smyth MJ,
    7. Lanier LL
    . IL-21 enhances tumor rejection through a NKG2Ddependent mechanism. J Immunol 2005; 175:2167–2173. pmid:16081783
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Friese MA,
    2. Wischhusen J,
    3. Wick W,
    4. Weiler M,
    5. Eisele G,
    6. Steinle A,
    7. Weller M
    . RNA interference targeting transforming growth factor-beta enhances NKG2D-mediated antiglioma immune response, inhibits glioma cell migration and invasiveness, and abrogates tumorigenicity. in vivo. Cancer Res  2004; 64:7596–7603. pmid:15492287
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Zhang C,
    2. Zhang J,
    3. Sun R,
    4. Feng J,
    5. Wei H,
    6. Tian Z
    . Opposing effect of IFNgamma and IFNalpha on expression of NKG2 receptors: negative regulation of IFNgamma on NK cells. Int Immunopharmacol 2005; 5: 1057–1067. pmid:15829421
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Song H,
    2. Hur DY,
    3. Kim KE,
    4. Park H,
    5. Kim T,
    6. Kim CW,
    7. Bang S,
    8. Cho DH
    . IL-2/IL-18 prevent the down-modulation of NKG2D by TGF-beta in NK cells via the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway. Cell Immunol  2006; 242: 39–45. pmid:17070508
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Zou Z,
    2. Nomura M,
    3. Takihara Y,
    4. Yasunaga T,
    5. Shimada K
    . Isolation and characterization of retinoic acid-inducible cDNA clones in F9 cells: a novel cDNA family encodes cell surface proteins sharing partial homology with MHC class I molecules. J Biochem 1996; 119:319–328. pmid:8882725
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Stephens HA
    . MICA and MICB genes: can the enigma of their polymorphism be resolved? Trends Immunol 2001; 22:378–385. pmid:11429322
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Bahram S,
    2. Bresnahan M,
    3. Geraghty DE,
    4. Spies T
    . A second lineage of mammalian major histocompatibility complex class I genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A  1994; 91: 6259–6263. pmid:8022771
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Choy MK,
    2. Phipps ME
    . MICA polymorphism: biology and importance in immunity and disease. Trends Mol Med 2010; 16:97–106. pmid:20153697
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Romphruk AV,
    2. Romphruk A,
    3. Naruse TK,
    4. Raroengjai S,
    5. Puapairoj C,
    6. Inoko H,
    7. Leelayuwat C
    . Polymorphisms of NKG2D ligands: diverse RAET1/ULBP genes in northeastern Thais. Immunogenetics 2009; 61: 611–617. pmid:19688209
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Malarkannan S,
    2. Shih PP,
    3. Eden PA,
    4. Horng T,
    5. Zuberi AR,
    6. Christianson G,
    7. Roopenian D,
    8. Shastri N
    . The molecular and functional characterization of a dominant minor H antigen, H60. J Immunol  1998; 161: 3501–3509. pmid:9759870
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Averdam A,
    2. Seelke S,
    3. Grützner I,
    4. Rosner C,
    5. Roos C,
    6. Westphal N,
    7. Stahl-Hennig C,
    8. Muppala V,
    9. Schrod A,
    10. Sauermann U,
    11. Dressel R,
    12. Walter L
    . Genotyping and segregation analyses indicate the presence of only two functional MIC genes in rhesus macaques. Immunogenetics  2007; 59: 247–251. pmid:17216437
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Seo JW,
    2. Walter L,
    3. Gunther E
    . Genomic analysis of MIC genes in rhesus macaques. Tissue Antigens 2001; 58:159–165. pmid:11703823
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Doxiadis GG,
    2. Heijmans CM,
    3. Otting N,
    4. Bontrop RE
    . MIC gene polymorphism and haplotype diversity in rhesus macaques. Tissue Antigens  2007; 69: 212–219. pmid:17493144
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Naruse TK,
    2. Okuda Y,
    3. Mori K,
    4. Akari H,
    5. Matano T,
    6. Kimura A
    . ULBP4/RAET1E is highly polymorphic in the Old World monkey. Immunogenetics  2011; 63: 501–509. pmid:21553130
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Cattley SK,
    2. Longman N,
    3. Dawkins RL,
    4. Gaudieri S,
    5. Kulski JK,
    6. Leelayuwat C
    . Phylogenetic analysis of primate MIC (PERB11) sequences suggests that the representation of the gene family differs in different primates: comparison of MIC (PERB11) and C4. Eur J Immunogenet  1999; 26: 233–238. pmid:10331161
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Groh V,
    2. Bahram S,
    3. Bauer S,
    4. Herman A,
    5. Beauchamp M,
    6. Spies T
    . Cell stress-regulated human major histocompatibility complex class I gene expressed in gastrointestinal epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A  1996; 93: 12445–12450. pmid:8901601
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Pende D,
    2. Rivera P,
    3. Marcenaro S,
    4. Chang CC,
    5. Biassoni R,
    6. Conte R,
    7. Kubin M,
    8. Cosman D,
    9. Ferrone S,
    10. Moretta L,
    11. Moretta A
    . Major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain a and UL16-binding protein expression on tumor cell lines of different histotypes: analysis of tumor susceptibility to NKG2D-dependent natural killer cell cytotoxicity. Cancer Res  2002; 62:6178–6186. pmid:12414645
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Friese MA,
    2. Platten M,
    3. Lutz SZ,
    4. Naumann U,
    5. Aulwurm S,
    6. Bischo F,
    7. Bühring HJ,
    8. Dichgans J,
    9. Rammensee HG,
    10. Steinle A,
    11. Weller M
    . MICA/NKG2D-mediated immunogene therapy of experimental gliomas. Cancer Res  2003; 63: 8996–9006. pmid:14695218
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Salih HR,
    2. Antropius H,
    3. Gieseke F,
    4. Lutz SZ,
    5. Kanz L,
    6. Rammensee HG,
    7. Steinle A
    . Functional expression and release of ligands for the activating immunoreceptor NKG2D in leukemia. Blood 2003; 102:1389–1396. pmid:12714493
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Groh V,
    2. Rhinehart R,
    3. Secrist H,
    4. Bauer S,
    5. Grabstein KH,
    6. Spies T
    . Broad tumor-associated expression and recognition by tumor-derived gamma delta T cells of MICA and MICB. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999; 96:6879–6884. pmid:10359807
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Watson NF,
    2. Spendlove I,
    3. Madjd Z,
    4. McGilvray R,
    5. Green AR,
    6. Ellis IO,
    7. Scholefield JH,
    8. Durrant LG
    . Expression of the stress-related MHC class I chain-related protein MICA is an indicator of good prognosis in colorectal cancer patients. Int J Cancer 2006; 118:1445–1452. pmid:16184547
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Vetter CS,
    2. Groh V,
    3. thor Straten P,
    4. Spies T,
    5. Brocker EB,
    6. Becker JC
    . Expression of stress-induced MHC class I related chain molecules on human melanoma. J Invest Dermatol 2002; 118:600–605. pmid:11918705
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Carlsten M,
    2. Björkstrom NK,
    3. Norell H,
    4. Bryceson Y,
    5. van Hall T,
    6. Baumann BC,
    7. Hanson M,
    8. Schedvins K,
    9. Kiessling R,
    10. Ljunggren HG,
    11. Malmberg KJ
    . DNAX accessory molecule-1 mediated recognition of freshly isolated ovarian carcinoma by resting natural killer cells. Cancer Res  2007; 67: 1317–1325. pmid:17283169
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.
    1. Carbone E,
    2. Neri P,
    3. Mesuraca M,
    4. Fulciniti MT,
    5. Otsuki T,
    6. Pende D,
    7. Groh V,
    8. Spies T,
    9. Pollio G,
    10. Cosman D,
    11. Catalano L,
    12. Tassone P,
    13. Rotoli B,
    14. Venuta S
    . HLA class I, NKG2D, and natural cytotoxicity receptors regulate multiple myeloma cell recognition by natural killer cells. Blood  2005; 105: 251–258. pmid:15328155
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    1. Wu JY,
    2. Ernstoff MS,
    3. Hill JM,
    4. Cole B,
    5. Meehan KR
    . Ex vivo expansion of non-MHC-restricted cytotoxic effector cells as adoptive immunotherapy for myeloma. Cytotherapy 2006; 8:141–148. pmid:16698687
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. McGilvray RW,
    2. Eagle RA,
    3. Watson NF,
    4. Al-Attar A,
    5. Ball G,
    6. Jafferji I,
    7. Trowsdale J,
    8. Durrant LG
    . NKG2D ligand expression in human colorectal cancer reveals associations with prognosis and evidence for immunoediting. Clin Cancer Res 2009; 15:6993–7002. pmid:19861434
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    1. Gasser S,
    2. Orsulic S,
    3. Brown EJ,
    4. Raulet DH
    . The DNA damage pathway regulates innate immune system ligands of the NKG2D receptor. Nature  2005; 436: 1186–1190. pmid:15995699
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    1. Bartkova J,
    2. Horejsí Z,
    3. Koed K,
    4. Krämer A,
    5. Tort F,
    6. Zieger K,
    7. Guldberg P,
    8. Sehested M,
    9. Nesland JM,
    10. Lukas C,
    11. Ørntoft T,
    12. Lukas J,
    13. Bartek J
    . DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis. Nature 2005; 434:864–870. pmid:15829956
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Gorgoulis VG,
    2. Vassiliou LV,
    3. Karakaidos P,
    4. Zacharatos P,
    5. Kotsinas A,
    6. Liloglou T,
    7. Venere M,
    8. Ditullio RA Jr,
    9. Kastrinakis NG,
    10. Levy B,
    11. Kletsas D,
    12. Yoneta A,
    13. Herlyn M,
    14. Kittas C,
    15. Halazonetis TD
    . Activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and genomic instability in human precancerous lesions. Nature 2005; 434:907–913. pmid:15829965
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. 50.↵
    1. Ruocco MG,
    2. Pilones KA,
    3. Kawashima N,
    4. Cammer M,
    5. Huang J,
    6. Babb JS,
    7. Liu M,
    8. Formenti SC,
    9. Dustin ML,
    10. Demaria S
    . Suppressing T cell motility induced by anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy improves antitumor effects. J Clin Invest 2012; 122:3718–3730. pmid:22945631
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. 51.↵
    1. Valeś-Gómez M,
    2. Chisholm SE,
    3. Cassady-Cain RL,
    4. Roda-Navarro P,
    5. Reyburn HT
    . Selective induction of expression of a ligand for the NKG2D receptor by proteasome inhibitors. Cancer Res 2008; 68:1546–1554. pmid:18316620
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. 52.↵
    1. Butler JE,
    2. Moore MB,
    3. Presnell SR,
    4. Chan HW,
    5. Chalupny NJ,
    6. Lutz CT
    . Proteasome regulation of ULBP1 transcription. J Immunol 2009; 182: 6600–6609. pmid:19414815
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. 53.↵
    1. Skov S,
    2. Pedersen MT,
    3. Andresen L,
    4. Straten PT,
    5. Woetmann A,
    6. Odum N
    . Cancer cells become susceptible to natural killer cell killing after exposure to histone deacetylase inhibitors due to glycogen synthase kinase-3-dependent expression of MHC class I-related chain A and B. Cancer Res 2005; 65:11136–11145. pmid:16322264
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. 54.↵
    1. Armeanu S,
    2. Bitzer M,
    3. Lauer UM,
    4. Venturelli S,
    5. Pathil A,
    6. Krusch M,
    7. Kaiser S,
    8. Jobst J,
    9. Smirnow I,
    10. Wagner A,
    11. Steinle A,
    12. Salih HR
    . Natural killer cell-mediated lysis of hepatoma cells via specific induction of NKG2D ligands by the histone deacetylase inhibitor sodium valproate. Cancer Res 2005; 65:6321–6329. pmid:16024634
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. 55.↵
    1. Lee JH,
    2. Choy ML,
    3. Ngo L,
    4. Foster SS,
    5. Marks PA
    . Histone deacetylase inhibitor induces DNA damage, which normal but not transformed cells can repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010; 107:14639–14644. pmid:20679231
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. 56.↵
    1. Berghuis D,
    2. Schilham MW,
    3. Vos HI,
    4. Santos SJ,
    5. Kloess S,
    6. Buddingh EP,
    7. Egeler RM,
    8. Hogendoorn PC,
    9. Lankester AC
    . Histone deacetylase inhibitors enhance expression of NKG2D ligands in Ewing sarcoma and sensitize for natural killer cell-mediated cytolysis. Clin Sarcoma Res  2012; 2: 8– pmid:22587892
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. 57.↵
    1. Maeda T,
    2. Towatari M,
    3. Kosugi H,
    4. Saito H
    . Up-regulation of costimulatory/adhesion molecules by histone deacetylase inhibitors in acute myeloid leukemia cells. Blood 2000; 96:3847–3856. pmid:11090069
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. 58.↵
    1. Okita R,
    2. Mougiakakos D,
    3. Ando T,
    4. Mao Y,
    5. Sarhan D,
    6. Wennerberg E,
    7. Seliger B,
    8. Lundqvist A,
    9. Mimura K,
    10. Kiessling R
    . HER2/HER3 signaling regulates NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity via MHC class I chain-related molecule A and B expression in human breast cancer cell lines. J Immunol 2012; 188:2136–2145. pmid:22301547
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. 59.↵
    1. Eissmann P,
    2. Evans JH,
    3. Mehrabi M,
    4. Rose EL,
    5. Nedvetzki S,
    6. Davis DM
    . Multiple mechanisms downstream of TLR-4 stimulation allow expression of NKG2D ligands to facilitate macrophage/NK cell crosstalk. J Immunol  2010; 184: 6901–6909. pmid:20488792
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. 60.↵
    1. Hamerman JA,
    2. Ogasawara K,
    3. Lanier LL
    . Cutting edge: Toll-like receptor signaling in macrophages induces ligands for the NKG2D receptor. J Immunol  2004; 172: 2001–2005. pmid:14764662
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. 61.↵
    1. Schwinn N,
    2. Vokhminova D,
    3. Sucker A,
    4. Textor S,
    5. Striegel S,
    6. Moll I,
    7. Nausch N,
    8. Tuettenberg J,
    9. Steinle A,
    10. Cerwenka A,
    11. Schadendorf D,
    12. Paschen A
    . Interferon-gamma down-regulates NKG2D ligand expression and impairs the NKG2D-mediated cytolysis of MHC class I-deficient melanoma by natural killer cells. Int J Cancer 2009; 124: 1594–1604. pmid:19089914
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. 62.↵
    1. Bui JD,
    2. Carayannopoulos LN,
    3. Lanier LL,
    4. Yokoyama WM,
    5. Schreiber RD
    . IFN-dependent down-regulation of the NKG2D ligand H60 on tumors. J Immunol  2006; 176: 905–913. pmid:16393975
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. 63.↵
    1. Eisele G,
    2. Wischhusen J,
    3. Mittelbronn M,
    4. Meyermann R,
    5. Waldhauer I,
    6. Steinle A,
    7. Weller M,
    8. Friese MA
    . TGF-beta and metalloproteinases differentially suppress NKG2D ligand surface expression on malignant glioma cells. Brain  2006; 129: 2416–2425. pmid:16891318
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. 64.↵
    1. Basu S,
    2. Pioli PA,
    3. Conejo-Garcia J,
    4. Wira CR,
    5. Sentman CL
    . Estradiol regulates MICA expression in human endometrial cells. Clin Immunol  2008; 129: 325–332. pmid:18728002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. 65.↵
    1. Stern-Ginossar N,
    2. Gur C,
    3. Biton M,
    4. Horwitz E,
    5. Elboim M,
    6. Stanietsky N,
    7. Mandelboim M,
    8. Mandelboim O
    . Human microRNAs regulate stress-induced immune responses mediated by the receptor NKG2D. Nat Immunol  2008; 9: 1065–1073. pmid:18677316
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. 66.↵
    1. Stern-Ginossar N,
    2. Elefant N,
    3. Zimmermann A,
    4. Wolf DG,
    5. Saleh N,
    6. Biton M,
    7. Horwitz E,
    8. Prokocimer Z,
    9. Prichard M,
    10. Hahn G,
    11. Goldman-Wohl D,
    12. Greenfield C,
    13. Yagel S,
    14. Hengel H,
    15. Altuvia Y,
    16. Margalit H,
    17. Mandelboim O
    . Host immune system gene targeting by a viral miRNA. Science  2007; 317: 376–381. pmid:17641203
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  67. 67.↵
    1. Yadav D,
    2. Ngolab J,
    3. Lim RS,
    4. Krishnamurthy S,
    5. Bui JD
    . Cutting edge: down-regulation of MHC class I-related chain A on tumor cells by IFN-gamma-induced microRNA. J Immunol 2009; 182:39–43. pmid:19109132
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  68. 68.↵
    1. Heinemann A,
    2. Zhao F,
    3. Pechlivanis S,
    4. Eberle J,
    5. Steinle A,
    6. Diederichs S,
    7. Schadendorf D,
    8. Paschen A
    . Tumor suppressive microRNAs miR-34a/c control cancer cell expression of ULBP2, a stress-induced ligand of the natural killer cell receptor NKG2D. Cancer Res 2012; 72: 460–471. pmid:22102694
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  69. 69.↵
    1. Nice TJ,
    2. Coscoy L,
    3. Raulet D
    . Posttranslational regulation of the NKG2D ligand Mult1 in response to cell stress. J Exp Med 2009; 206: 287–298. pmid:19171762
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. 70.↵
    1. Nomura M,
    2. Zou Z,
    3. Joh T,
    4. Takihara Y,
    5. Matsuda Y,
    6. Shimada K
    . Genomic structures and characterization of Rae1 family members encoding GPI-anchored cell surface proteins and expressed predominantly in embryonic mouse brain. J Biochem 1996; 120:987–995. pmid:8982867
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  71. 71.↵
    1. Cosman D,
    2. Mullberg J,
    3. Sutherland CL,
    4. Chin W,
    5. Armitage R,
    6. Fanslow W,
    7. Kubin M,
    8. Chalupny NJ
    . ULBPs, novel MHC class I-related molecules, bind to CMV glycoprotein UL16 and stimulate NK cytotoxicity through the NKG2D receptor. Immunity 2001; 14:123–133. pmid:11239445
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. 72.↵
    1. Takada A,
    2. Yoshida S,
    3. Kajikawa M,
    4. Miyatake Y,
    5. Tomaru U,
    6. Sakai M,
    7. Chiba H,
    8. Maenaka K,
    9. Kohda D,
    10. Fugo K,
    11. Kasahara M
    . Two novel NKG2D ligands of the mouse H60 family with differential expression patterns and binding affinities to NKG2D. J Immunol 2008; 180: 1678–1685. pmid:18209064
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  73. 73.↵
    1. Carayannopoulos LN,
    2. Naidenko OV,
    3. Fremont DH,
    4. Yokoyama WM
    . Cutting edge: murine UL16-binding protein-like transcript 1: a newly described transcript encoding a high-affinity ligand for murine NKG2D. J Immunol 2002; 169:4079–4083. pmid:12370332
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  74. 74.↵
    1. Hüe S,
    2. Mention JJ,
    3. Monteiro RC,
    4. Zhang S,
    5. Cellier C,
    6. Schmitz J,
    7. Verkarre V,
    8. Fodil N,
    9. Bahram S,
    10. Cerf-Bensussan N
    . Caillat-Zucman S. A direct role for NKG2D/MICA interaction in villous atrophy during celiac disease. Immunity 2004; 21:367–377. pmid:15357948
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. 75.↵
    1. Ogasawara K,
    2. Hamerman JA,
    3. Ehrlich LR,
    4. Bour-Jordan H,
    5. Santamaria P,
    6. Bluestone JA,
    7. Lanier LL
    . NKG2D blockade prevents autoimmune diabetes in NOD mice. Immunity 2004; 20:757–767. pmid:15189740
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. 76.↵
    1. Nikitina-Zake L,
    2. Rajalingham R,
    3. Rumba I,
    4. Sanjeevi CB
    . Killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor genes in Latvian patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and healthy controls. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2004; 1037: 161–169. pmid:15699512
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. 77.↵
    1. Gambelunghe G,
    2. Brozzetti A,
    3. Ghaderi M,
    4. Candeloro P,
    5. Tortoioli C,
    6. Falorni A
    . MICA gene polymorphism in the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes. Ann N Y Acad Sci  2007; 1110: 92–98. pmid:17911424
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. 78.↵
    1. Meresse B,
    2. Chen Z,
    3. Ciszewski C,
    4. Tretiakova M,
    5. Bhagat G,
    6. Krausz TN,
    7. Raulet DH,
    8. Lanier LL,
    9. Groh V,
    10. Spies T,
    11. Ebert EC,
    12. Green PH,
    13. Jabri B
    . Coordinated induction by IL15 of a TCR-independent NKG2D signaling pathway converts CTL into lymphokine-activated killer cells in celiac disease. Immunity  2004; 21:357–366. pmid:15357947
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. 79.↵
    1. Petukhova L,
    2. Duvic M,
    3. Hordinsky M,
    4. Norris D,
    5. Price V,
    6. Shimomura Y,
    7. Kim H,
    8. Singh P,
    9. Lee A,
    10. Chen WV,
    11. Meyer KC,
    12. Paus R,
    13. Jahoda CA,
    14. Amos CI,
    15. Gregersen PK,
    16. Christiano AM
    . Genome-wide association study in alopecia areata implicates both innate and adaptive immunity. Nature  2010; 466: 113–117. pmid:20596022
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. 80.↵
    1. Groh V,
    2. Bruhl A,
    3. El-Gabalawy H,
    4. Nelson JL,
    5. Spies T
    . Stimulation of T cell autoreactivity by anomalous expression of NKG2D and its MIC ligands in rheumatoid arthritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100: 9452–9457. pmid:12878725
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  81. 81.↵
    1. Dai Z,
    2. Turtle CJ,
    3. Booth GC,
    4. Riddell SR,
    5. Gooley TA,
    6. Stevens AM,
    7. Spies T,
    8. Groh V
    . Normally occurring NKG2D(+)CD4(+) T cells are immunosuppressive and inversely correlated with disease activity in juvenile-onset lupus. J Exp Med 2009; 206:793–805. pmid:19289577
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  82. 82.↵
    1. Schrambach S,
    2. Ardizzone M,
    3. Leymarie V,
    4. Sibilia J,
    5. Bahram S
    . In vivo expression pattern of MICA and MICB and its relevance to autoimmunity and cancer. PLoS One  2007; 2: e518– pmid:17565371
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. 83.↵
    1. Nepom GT,
    2. Erlich H
    . MHC class-II molecules and autoimmunity. Annu Rev Immunol  1991; 9: 493–525.pmid:1910687
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  84. 84.↵
    1. Kjellev S,
    2. Haase C,
    3. Lundsgaard D,
    4. Urso B,
    5. Tornehave D,
    6. Markholst H
    . Inhibition of NKG2D receptor function by antibody therapy attenuates transfer-induced colitis in SCID mice. Eur J Immunol 2007; 37: 1397–1406. pmid:17407193
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. 85.↵
    1. Wesselkamper SC,
    2. Eppert BL,
    3. Motz GT,
    4. Lau GW,
    5. Hassett DJ,
    6. Borchers MT
    . NKG2D is critical for NK cell activation in host defense against Pseudomonas aeruginosa respiratory infection. J Immunol 2009; 181:5481–5489. pmid:18832705
    OpenUrlPubMed
  86. 86.↵
    1. Borchers MT,
    2. Harris NL,
    3. Wesselkamper SC,
    4. Zhang S,
    5. Chen Y,
    6. Young L,
    7. Lau GW
    . The NKG2D-activating receptor mediates pulmonary clearance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect Immun 2006; 74: 2578–2586. pmid:16622193
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  87. 87.↵
    1. Tieng V,
    2. Le Bouguénec C,
    3. du Merle L,
    4. Bertheau P,
    5. Desreumaux P,
    6. Janin A,
    7. Charron D,
    8. Toubert A
    . Binding of Escherichia coli adhesin AfaE to CD55 triggers cell-surface expression of the MHC class I-related molecule MICA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99: 2977–2982. pmid:11830641
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  88. 88.↵
    1. Rausch A,
    2. Hessmann M,
    3. Holscher A,
    4. Schreiber T,
    5. Bulfone-Paus S,
    6. Ehlers S,
    7. Hölscher C
    . Interleukin-15 mediates protection against experimental tuberculosis: a role for NKG2D-dependent effector mechanisms of CD8+ T cells. Eur J Immunol 2006; 36:1156–1167. pmid:16619285
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  89. 89.↵
    1. Ward J,
    2. Davis Z,
    3. DeHart J,
    4. Zimmerman E,
    5. Bosque A,
    6. Brunetta E,
    7. Mavilio D,
    8. Planelles V,
    9. Barker E
    . HIV-1 Vpr triggers natural killer cell-mediated lysis of infected cells through activation of the ATR-mediated DNA damage response. PLoS Pathog 2009; 5:e1000613–pmid:19798433
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  90. 90.↵
    1. Draghi M,
    2. Pashine A,
    3. Sanjanwala B,
    4. Gendzekhadze K,
    5. Cantoni C,
    6. Cosman D,
    7. Moretta A,
    8. Valiante NM,
    9. Parham P
    . NKp46 and NKG2D recognition of infected dendritic cells is necessary for NK cell activation in the human response to influenza infection. J Immunol 2007; 178: 2688–2698. pmid:17312110
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  91. 91.↵
    1. Diefenbach A,
    2. Jamieson AM,
    3. Liu SD,
    4. Shastri N,
    5. Raulet DH
    . Ligands for the murine NKG2D receptor: expression by tumor cells and activation of NK cells and macrophages. Nat Immunol 2000; 1:119–126. pmid:11248803
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  92. 92.
    1. Nedvetzki S,
    2. Sowinski S,
    3. Eagle RA,
    4. Harris J,
    5. Vély F,
    6. Pende D,
    7. Trowsdale J,
    8. Vivier E,
    9. Gordon S,
    10. Davis DM
    . Reciprocal regulation of human natural killer cells and macrophages associated with distinct immune synapses. Blood  2007; 109:3776–3785. pmid:17218381
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  93. 93.↵
    1. Basu S,
    2. Eriksson M,
    3. Pioli PA,
    4. Conejo-Garcia J,
    5. Mselle TF,
    6. Yamamoto S,
    7. Wira CR,
    8. Sentman CL
    . Human uterine NK cells interact with uterine macrophages via NKG2D upon stimulation with PAMPs. Am J Reprod Immunol  2009; 61: 52–61. pmid:19086992
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  94. 94.↵
    1. Wu J,
    2. Chalupny NJ,
    3. Manley TJ,
    4. Riddell SR,
    5. Cosman D,
    6. Spies T
    . Intracellular retention of the MHC class I-related chain B ligand of NKG2D by the human cytomegalovirus UL16 glycoprotein. J Immunol  2003; 170: 4196–4200. pmid:12682252
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  95. 95.
    1. Jinushi M,
    2. Takehara T,
    3. Kanto T,
    4. Tatsumi T,
    5. Groh V,
    6. Spies T,
    7. Miyagi T,
    8. Suzuki T,
    9. Sasaki Y,
    10. Hayashi N
    . Critical role of MHC class I-related chain A and B expression on IFN-alpha-stimulated dendritic cells in NK cell activation: impairment in chronic hepatitis C virus infection. J Immunol  2003; 170: 1249–1256. pmid:12538683
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  96. 96.↵
    1. McSharry BP,
    2. Burgert HG,
    3. Owen DP,
    4. Stanton RJ,
    5. Prod’homme V,
    6. Sester M,
    7. Koebernick K,
    8. Groh V,
    9. Spies T,
    10. Cox S,
    11. Little AM,
    12. Wang EC,
    13. Tomasec P,
    14. Wilkinson GW
    . Adenovirus E3/19K promotes evasion of NK cell recognition by intracellular sequestration of the NKG2D ligands major histocompatibility complex class I chain-related proteins A and B. J Virol  2009; 82:4585–4594. pmid:18287244
    OpenUrlPubMed
  97. 97.
    1. Jensen H,
    2. Andresen L,
    3. Nielsen J,
    4. Christensen JP,
    5. Skov S
    . Vesicular stomatitis virus infection promotes immune evasion by preventing NKG2D-ligand surface expression. PLoS One 2011; 6:e23023– pmid:21857986
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  98. 98.↵
    1. Schepis D,
    2. D’Amato M,
    3. Studahl M,
    4. Bergström T,
    5. Kärre K,
    6. Berg L
    . Herpes simplex virus infection downmodulates NKG2D ligand expression. Scand J Immunol  2009; 69: 429–436. pmid:19508374
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  99. 99.↵
    1. Welte SA,
    2. Sinzger C,
    3. Lutz SZ,
    4. Singh-Jasuja H,
    5. Sampaio KL,
    6. Eknigk U,
    7. Rammensee HG,
    8. Steinle A
    . Selective intracellular retention of virally induced NKG2D ligands by the human cytomegalovirus UL16 glycoprotein. Eur J Immunol  2003; 33:194–203. pmid:12594848
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  100. 100.↵
    1. Rolle A,
    2. Mousavi-Jazi M,
    3. Eriksson M,
    4. Odeberg J,
    5. Soderberg-Naucler C,
    6. Cosman D,
    7. Kärre K,
    8. Cerboni C
    . Effects of human cytomegalovirus infection on ligands for the activating NKG2D receptor of NK cells: up-regulation of UL16-binding protein (ULBP)1 and ULBP2 is counteracted by the viral UL16 protein. J Immunol 2003; 171:902–908. pmid:12847260
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  101. 101.↵
    1. Guerra N,
    2. Tan YX,
    3. Joncker NT,
    4. Choy A,
    5. Gallardo F,
    6. Xiong N,
    7. Knoblaugh S,
    8. Cado D,
    9. Greenberg NM,
    10. Raulet DH
    . NKG2D-deficient mice are defective in tumor surveillance in models of spontaneous malignancy. Immunity  2008; 28:571–580. pmid:18394936
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  102. 102.↵
    1. Salih HR,
    2. Rammensee HG,
    3. Steinle A
    . Cutting edge: down-regulation of MICA on human tumors by proteolytic shedding. J Immunol 2002; 169: 4098–4102. pmid:12370336
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  103. 103.↵
    1. Groh V,
    2. Wu J,
    3. Yee C,
    4. Spies T
    . Tumour-derived soluble MIC ligands impair expression of NKG2D and T-cell activation. Nature 2002; 419: 734–738. pmid:12384702
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  104. 104.
    1. Raffaghello L,
    2. Prigione I,
    3. Airoldi I,
    4. Camoriano M,
    5. Levreri I,
    6. Gambini C,
    7. Pende D,
    8. Steinle A,
    9. Ferrone S,
    10. Pistoia V
    . Downregulation and/or release of NKG2D ligands as immune evasion strategy of human neuroblastoma. Neoplasia  2004; 6: 558–568. pmid:15548365
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  105. 105.↵
    1. Holdenrieder S,
    2. Stieber P,
    3. Peterfi A,
    4. Nagel D,
    5. Steinle A,
    6. Salih HR
    . Soluble MICA in malignant diseases. Int J Cancer 2006; 118:684–687. pmid:16094621
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  106. 106.↵
    1. Dasgupta S,
    2. Bhattacharya-Chatterjee M,
    3. O’Malley BW Jr,
    4. Chatterjee SK
    . Inhibition of NK cell activity through TGF-beta 1 by down-regulation of NKG2D in a murine model of head and neck cancer. J Immunol  2005; 175: 5541–5550. pmid:16210663
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  107. 107.
    1. Castriconi R,
    2. Cantoni C,
    3. Della Chiesa M,
    4. Vitale M,
    5. Marcenaro E,
    6. Conte R,
    7. Biassoni R,
    8. Bottino C,
    9. Moretta L,
    10. Moretta A
    . Transforming growth factor beta 1 inhibits expression of NKp30 and NKG2D receptors: consequences for the NK-mediated killing of dendritic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100:4120–4125. pmid:12646700
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  108. 108.↵
    1. Crane CA,
    2. Han SJ,
    3. Barry JJ,
    4. Ahn BJ,
    5. Lanier LL,
    6. Parsa AT
    . TGF-beta downregulates the activating receptor NKG2D on NK cells and CD8+ T cells in glioma patients. Neuro Oncol 2010; 12:7–13. pmid:20150362
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  109. 109.↵
    1. Wiemann K,
    2. Mittrucker HW,
    3. Feger U,
    4. Welte SA,
    5. Yokoyama WM,
    6. Spies T,
    7. Rammensee HG,
    8. Steinle A
    . Systemic NKG2D down-regulation impairs NK and CD8 T cell responses. in vivo. J Immunol 2005; 175:720–729. pmid:16002667
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  110. 110.↵
    1. Groh V,
    2. Wu J,
    3. Yee C,
    4. Spies T
    . Tumour-derived soluble MIC ligands impair expression of NKG2D and T-cell activation. Nature 2002; 419: 734–738. pmid:12384702
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  111. 111.↵
    1. Diefenbach A,
    2. Jensen ER,
    3. Jamieson AM,
    4. Raulet DH
    . Rae1 and H60 ligands of the NKG2D receptor stimulate tumour immunity. Nature 2001; 413: 165–171. pmid:11557981
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  112. 112.↵
    1. Barber A,
    2. Zhang T,
    3. Sentman CL
    . Immunotherapy with chimeric NKG2D receptors leads to long-term tumor-free survival and development of host antitumor immunity in murine ovarian cancer. J Immunol  2008; 180: 72–78. pmid:18097006
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  113. 113.↵
    1. Kohga K,
    2. Takehara T,
    3. Tatsumi T,
    4. Miyagi T,
    5. Ishida H,
    6. Ohkawa K,
    7. Kanto T,
    8. Hiramatsu N,
    9. Hayashi N
    . Anticancer chemotherapy inhibits MHC class I-related chain a ectodomain shedding by downregulating ADAM10 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res  2009; 69:8050–8057. pmid:19826051
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  114. 114.↵
    1. Li H,
    2. Han Y,
    3. Guo Q,
    4. Zhang M,
    5. Cao X
    . Cancer-expanded myeloid-derived suppressor cells induce anergy of NK cells through membrane-bound TGF-beta 1. J Immunol 2009; 182:240–249. pmid:19109155
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  115. 115.↵
    1. Smyth MJ,
    2. Teng MW,
    3. Swann J,
    4. Kyparissoudis K,
    5. Godfrey DI,
    6. Hayakawa Y
    . CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cells suppress NK cell-mediated immunotherapy of cancer. J Immunol 2006; 176:1582–1587. pmid:16424187
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  116. 116.↵
    1. Choi BK,
    2. Kim YH,
    3. Kang WJ,
    4. Lee SK,
    5. Kim KH,
    6. Shin SM,
    7. Yokoyama WM,
    8. Kim TY,
    9. Kwon BS
    . Mechanisms involved in synergistic anticancer immunity of anti-4-1BB and anti-CD4 therapy. Cancer Res 2007; 67: 8891–8899. pmid:17875731
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  117. 117.↵
    1. Nausch N,
    2. Galani IE,
    3. Schlecker E,
    4. Cerwenka A
    . Mononuclear myeloid-derived “suppressor” cells express RAE-1 and activate natural killer cells. Blood  2008; 112: 4080–4089. pmid:18753637
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  118. 118.↵
    1. Zhang T,
    2. Sentman CL
    . Cancer immunotherapy using a bispecific NK receptor fusion protein that engages both T cells and tumor cells. Cancer Res  2011; 71: 2066–2076. pmid:21282338
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  119. 119.↵
    1. Barber A,
    2. Rynda A,
    3. Sentman CL
    . Chimeric NKG2D expressing T cells eliminate immunosuppression and activate immunity within the ovarian tumor microenvironment. J Immunol 2009; 183:6939–6947. pmid:19915047
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  120. 120.↵
    1. Roy S,
    2. Barnes PF,
    3. Garg A,
    4. Wu S,
    5. Cosman D,
    6. Vankayalapati R
    . NK cells lyse T regulatory cells that expand in response to an intracellular pathogen. J Immunol 2008; 180:1729–1736. pmid:18209070
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  121. 121.↵
    1. Porter DL,
    2. Levine BL,
    3. Kalos M,
    4. Bagg A,
    5. June CH
    . Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells in chronic lymphoid leukemia. N Engl J Med  2011; 365: 725–733. pmid:21830940
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  122. 122.
    1. Shin T,
    2. Nakayama T,
    3. Akutsu Y,
    4. Motohashi S,
    5. Shibata Y,
    6. Harada M,
    7. Kamada N,
    8. Shimizu C,
    9. Shimizu E,
    10. Saito T,
    11. Ochiai T
    . Taniguchi M. Inhibition of tumor metastasis by adoptive transfer of IL-12activated Valpha14 NKT cells. Int J Cancer 2001; 91:523–528. pmid:11251976
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  123. 123.
    1. Miller JS,
    2. Soignier Y,
    3. Panoskaltsis-Mortari A,
    4. McNearney SA,
    5. Yun GH,
    6. Fautsch SK,
    7. McKenna D,
    8. Le C,
    9. Defor TE,
    10. Burns LJ,
    11. Orchard PJ,
    12. Blazar BR,
    13. Wagner JE,
    14. Slungaard A,
    15. Weisdorf DJ,
    16. Okazaki IJ,
    17. McGlave PB
    . Successful adoptive transfer and in vivo expansion of human haploidentical NK cells in patients with cancer. Blood  2005; 105: 3051–3057. pmid:15632206
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  124. 124.
    1. Abe Y,
    2. Muto M,
    3. Nieda M,
    4. Nakagawa Y,
    5. Nicol A,
    6. Kaneko T,
    7. Goto S,
    8. Yokokawa K,
    9. Suzuki K
    . Clinical and immunological evaluation of zoledronate-activated Vgamma9gammadelta T-cell-based immunotherapy for patients with multiple myeloma. Exp Hematol 2009; 37: 956–968. pmid:19409955
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  125. 125.↵
    1. Rosenberg SA,
    2. Lotze MT,
    3. Muul LM,
    4. Chang AE,
    5. Avis FP,
    6. Leitman S,
    7. Linehan WM,
    8. Robertson CN,
    9. Lee RE,
    10. Rubin JT,
    11. Seipp CA,
    12. Simpson CG,
    13. White DE
    . A progress report on the treatment of 157 patients with advanced cancer using lymphokine-activated killer cells and interleukin-2 or high-dose interleukin-2 alone. N Engl J Med  1987; 316:889–897. pmid:3493432
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  126. 126.↵
    1. Nakajima J,
    2. Murakawa T,
    3. Fukami T,
    4. Goto S,
    5. Kaneko T,
    6. Yoshida Y,
    7. Takamoto S,
    8. Kakimi K
    . A phase I study of adoptive immunotherapy for recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer patients with autologous gammadelta T cells. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010; 37:1191–1197. pmid:20137969
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  127. 127.↵
    1. Smyth MJ,
    2. Swann J,
    3. Kelly JM,
    4. Cretney E,
    5. Yokoyama WM,
    6. Diefenbach A,
    7. Sayers TJ,
    8. Hayakawa Y
    . NKG2D recognition and perforin effector function mediate effective cytokine immunotherapy of cancer. J Exp Med  2004; 200: 1325–1335. pmid:15545356
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  128. 128.↵
    1. Jinushi M,
    2. Hodi FS,
    3. Dranoff G
    . Therapy-induced antibodies to MHC class I chain-related protein A antagonize immune suppression and stimulate antitumor cytotoxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103: 9190–9195. pmid:16754847
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  129. 129.↵
    1. Armeanu S,
    2. Krusch M,
    3. Baltz KM,
    4. Weiss TS,
    5. Smirnow I,
    6. Steinle A,
    7. Lauer UM,
    8. Bitzer M,
    9. Salih HR
    . Direct and natural killer cell-mediated antitumor effects of low-dose bortezomib in hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res  2008; 14:3520–3528. pmid:18519785
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  130. 130.↵
    1. Zhang T,
    2. Barber A,
    3. Sentman CL
    . Chimeric NKG2D modified T cells inhibit systemic T-cell lymphoma growth in a manner involving multiple cytokines and cytotoxic pathways. Cancer Res 2007; 67: 11029–11036. pmid:18006849
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  131. 131.↵
    1. Barber A,
    2. Meehan KR,
    3. Sentman CL
    . Treatment of multiple myeloma with adoptively transferred chimeric NKG2D receptor-expressing T cells. Gene Ther  2011; 18: 509–516. pmid:21209626
    OpenUrlPubMed
  132. 132.↵
    1. Barber A,
    2. Sentman CL
    . NKG2D receptor regulates human effector T-cell cytokine production. Blood 2011; 117:6571–6581. pmid:21518928
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  133. 133.↵
    1. Zhang T,
    2. Lemoi BA,
    3. Sentman CL
    . Chimeric NK-receptor-bearing T cells mediate antitumor immunotherapy. Blood 2005; 106:1544–1551. pmid:15890688
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  134. 134.↵
    1. Barber A,
    2. Sentman CL
    . Chimeric NKG2D T cells require both T cell- and host-derived cytokine secretion and perforin expression to increase tumor antigen presentation and systemic immunity. J Immunol  2009; 183: 2365–2372. pmid:19625653
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  135. 135.↵
    1. Spear P,
    2. Barber A,
    3. Rynda-Apple A,
    4. Sentman CL
    . Chimeric antigen receptor T cells shape myeloid cell function within the tumor microenvironment through IFN-gamma and GM-CSF. J Immunol 2012; 188: 6389–6398. pmid:22586039
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  136. 136.↵
    1. Zhang T,
    2. Barber A,
    3. Sentman CL
    . Generation of antitumor responses by genetic modification of primary human T cells with a chimeric NKG2D receptor. Cancer Res 2006; 66:5927–5933. pmid:16740733
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  137. 137.↵
    1. Lehner M,
    2. Gotz G,
    3. Proff J,
    4. Schaft N,
    5. Dörrie J,
    6. Full F,
    7. Ensser A,
    8. Muller YA,
    9. Cerwenka A,
    10. Abken H,
    11. Parolini O,
    12. Ambros PF,
    13. Kovar H,
    14. Holter W
    . Redirecting T cells to Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors by a chimeric NKG2D receptor expressed by lentiviral transduction or mRNA transfection. PLoS One  2012; 7: e31210– pmid:22355347
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  138. 138.↵
    1. von Strandmann EP,
    2. Hansen HP,
    3. Reiners KS,
    4. Schnell R,
    5. Borchmann P,
    6. Merkert S,
    7. Simhadri VR,
    8. Draube A,
    9. Reiser M,
    10. Purr I,
    11. Hallek M,
    12. Engert A
    . A novel bispecific protein (ULBP2-BB4) targeting the NKG2D receptor on natural killer (NK) cells and CD138 activates NK cells and has potent antitumor activity against human multiple myeloma in vitro and in vivo Blood 2006; 107:1955–1962. pmid:16210338
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  139. 139.
    1. Li P,
    2. Morris DL,
    3. Willcox BE,
    4. Steinle A,
    5. Spies T,
    6. Strong RK
    . Complex structure of the activating immunoreceptor NKG2D and its MHC class I-like ligand MICA. Nat Immunol 2001; 2:443–451. pmid:11323699
    OpenUrlPubMed
  140. 140.
    1. McFarland BJ,
    2. Strong RK
    . Thermodynamic analysis of degenerate recognition by the NKG2D immunoreceptor: not induced fit but rigid adaptation. Immunity  2003; 19: 803–812. pmid:14670298
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  141. 141.
    1. Carayannopoulos LN,
    2. Naidenko OV,
    3. Kinder J,
    4. Ho EL,
    5. Fremont DH,
    6. Yokoyama W
    . Ligands for murine NKG2D display heterogeneous binding behavior. Eur J Immunol 2002; 32:597–605. pmid:11857333
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  142. 142.
    1. O’Callaghan CA,
    2. Cerwenka A,
    3. Willcox BE,
    4. Lanier LL,
    5. Bjorkman PJ
    . Molecular competition for NKG2D: H60 and RAE1 compete unequally for NKG2D with dominance of H60. Immunity 2001; 15:201–211. pmid:11520456
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  143. 143.
    1. Zhang X,
    2. Schwartz JC,
    3. Guo X,
    4. Bhatia S,
    5. Cao E,
    6. Lorenz M,
    7. Cammer M,
    8. Chen L,
    9. Zhang ZY,
    10. Edidin MA,
    11. Nathenson SG,
    12. Almo SC
    . Structural and functional analysis of the costimulatory receptor programmed death-1. Immunity  2004; 20: 337–347. pmid:15030777
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  144. 144.
    1. van der Merwe PA,
    2. Bodian DL,
    3. Daenke S,
    4. Linsley P,
    5. Davis SJ
    . CD80 (B7-1) binds both CD28 and CTLA-4 with a low affinity and very fast kinetics. J Exp Med  1997; 185: 393–403. pmid:9053440
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  145. 145.
    1. Stone JD,
    2. Chervin AS
    . Kranz DM (2009) T-cell receptor binding affinities and kinetics: impact on T-cell activity and specificity. Immunology  2009; 126: 165–176. pmid:19125887
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  146. 146.
    1. Li Y,
    2. Wang Q,
    3. Mariuzza RA
    . Structure of the human activating natural cytotoxicity receptor NKp30 bound to its tumor cell ligand B7-H6. J Exp Med  2011; 208: 703–714. pmid:21422170
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  147. 147.
    1. Brown MH,
    2. Boles K,
    3. van der Merwe PA,
    4. Kumar V,
    5. Mathew PA,
    6. Barclay AN
    . 2B4, the natural killer and T cell immunoglobulin superfamily surface protein, is a ligand for CD48. J Exp Med 1998; 188: 2083–2090. pmid:9841922
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  148. 148.
    1. Barber A,
    2. Zhang T,
    3. DeMars LR,
    4. Conejo-Garcia J,
    5. Roby KF,
    6. Sentman CL
    . Chimeric NKG2D receptor-bearing T cells as immunotherapy for ovarian cancer. Cancer Res 2007; 67:5003–5008. pmid:17510432
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  149. 149.
    1. Li K,
    2. Mandai M,
    3. Hamanishi J,
    4. Matsumura N,
    5. Suzuki A,
    6. Yagi H,
    7. Yamaguchi K,
    8. Baba T,
    9. Fujii S,
    10. Konishi I
    . Clinical significance of the NKG2D ligands, MICA/B and ULBP2 in ovarian cancer: high expression of ULBP2 is an indicator of poor prognosis. Cancer Immunol Immunother  2009; 58: 641–652. pmid:18731713
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  150. 150.
    1. McGilvray RW,
    2. Eagle RA,
    3. Rolland P,
    4. Jafferji I,
    5. Trowsdale J,
    6. Durrant LG
    . ULBP2 and RAET1E NKG2D ligands are independent predictors of poor prognosis in ovarian cancer patients. Int J Cancer 2010; 127: 1412–1420. pmid:20054857
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  151. 151.
    1. Conejo-Garcia JR,
    2. Benencia F,
    3. Courreges MC,
    4. Gimotty PA,
    5. Khang E,
    6. Buckanovich RJ,
    7. Frauwirth KA,
    8. Zhang L,
    9. Katsaros D,
    10. Thompson CB,
    11. Levine B,
    12. Coukos G
    . Ovarian carcinoma expresses the NKG2D ligand Letal and promotes the survival and expansion of CD28- antitumor T cells. Cancer Res  2004; 64: 2175–2182. pmid:15026360
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  152. 152.
    1. Cathro HP,
    2. Smolkin ME,
    3. Theodorescu D,
    4. Jo VY,
    5. Ferrone S,
    6. Frierson HF Jr..
    . Relationship between HLA class I antigen processing machinery component expression and the clinicopathologic characteristics of bladder carcinomas. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2010; 59: 465–472. pmid:19756593
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  153. 153.
    1. Madjd Z,
    2. Spendlove I,
    3. Moss R,
    4. Bevin S,
    5. Pinder SE,
    6. Watson NF,
    7. Ellis I,
    8. Durrant LG
    . Upregulation of MICA on high-grade invasive operable breast carcinoma. Cancer Immun  2007; 7: 17– pmid:17948965
    OpenUrlPubMed
  154. 154.
    1. Mamessier E,
    2. Sylvain A,
    3. Bertucci F,
    4. Castellano R,
    5. Finetti P,
    6. Houvenaeghel G,
    7. Charaffe-Jaufret E,
    8. Birnbaum D,
    9. Moretta A,
    10. Olive D
    . Human breast tumor cells induce self-tolerance mechanisms to avoid NKG2D-mediated and DNAM-mediated NK cell recognition. Cancer Res  2011; 71: 6621–6632. pmid:21937679
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  155. 155.
    1. Mamessier E,
    2. Sylvain A,
    3. Thibult ML,
    4. Houvenaeghel G,
    5. Jacquemier J,
    6. Castellano R,
    7. Gonçalves A,
    8. André P,
    9. Romagné F,
    10. Thibault G,
    11. Viens P,
    12. Birnbaum D,
    13. Bertucci F,
    14. Moretta A,
    15. Olive D
    . Human breast cancer cells enhance self tolerance by promoting evasion from NK cell antitumor immunity. J Clin Invest 2011; 121:3609–3622. pmid:21841316
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  156. 156.
    1. Busche A,
    2. Goldmann T,
    3. Naumann U,
    4. Steinle A,
    5. Brandau S
    . Natural killer cell-mediated rejection of experimental human lung cancer by genetic overexpression of major histocompatibility complex class I chain-related gene A. Hum Gene Ther 2006; 17:135–146. pmid:16454647
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  157. 157.
    1. Platonova S,
    2. Cherfils-Vicini J,
    3. Damotte D,
    4. Crozet L,
    5. Vieillard V,
    6. Validire P,
    7. André P,
    8. Dieu-Nosjean MC,
    9. Alifano M,
    10. Régnard JF,
    11. Fridman WH,
    12. Sautès-Fridman C,
    13. Cremer I
    . Profound coordinated alterations of intratumoral NK cell phenotype and function in lung carcinoma. Cancer Res  2011; 71: 5412–5422. pmid:21708957
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  158. 158.
    1. Jinushi M,
    2. Takehara T,
    3. Tatsumi T,
    4. Kanto T,
    5. Groh V,
    6. Spies T,
    7. Kimura R,
    8. Miyagi T,
    9. Mochizuki K,
    10. Sasaki Y,
    11. Hayashi N
    . Expression and role of MICA and MICB in human hepatocellular carcinomas and their regulation by retinoic acid. Int J Cancer 2003; 104:354–361. pmid:12569559
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  159. 159.
    1. Sconocchia G,
    2. Spagnoli GC,
    3. Del Principe D,
    4. Ferrone S,
    5. Anselmi M,
    6. Wongsena W,
    7. Cervelli V,
    8. Schultz-Thater E,
    9. Wyler S,
    10. Carafa V,
    11. Moch H,
    12. Terracciano L,
    13. Tornillo L
    . Defective infiltration of natural killer cells in MICA/B-positive renal cell carcinoma involves beta(2)-integrin-mediated interaction. Neoplasia 2009; 11:662–671. pmid:19568411
    OpenUrlPubMed
  160. 160.
    1. Viey E,
    2. Fromont G,
    3. Escudier B,
    4. Morel Y,
    5. Da Rocha S,
    6. Chouaib S,
    7. Caignard A
    . Phosphostim-activated gamma delta T cells kill autologous metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Immunol 2005; 174:13381347– pmid:15661891
    OpenUrlPubMed
  161. 161.
    1. Wu JD,
    2. Higgins LM,
    3. Steinle A,
    4. Cosman D,
    5. Haugk K,
    6. Plymate SR
    . Prevalent expression of the immunostimulatory MHC class I chain-related molecule is counteracted by shedding in prostate cancer. J Clin Invest  2004; 114:560–568. pmid:15314693
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  162. 162.
    1. Diermayr S,
    2. Himmelreich H,
    3. Durovic,
    4. Mathys-Schneeberger A,
    5. Siegler U,
    6. Langenkamp U,
    7. Hofsteenge J,
    8. Gratwohl A,
    9. Tichelli A,
    10. Paluszewska M,
    11. Wiktor-Jedrzejczak W,
    12. Kalberer CP,
    13. Wodnar-Filipowicz A
    . NKG2D ligand expression in AML increases in response to HDAC inhibitor valproic acid and contributes to allorecognition by NK-cell lines with single KIR-HLA class I specificities. Blood  2009; 111: 1428–1436. pmid:17993609
    OpenUrlPubMed
  163. 163.
    1. Nowbakht P,
    2. Ionescu MC,
    3. Rohner A,
    4. Kalberer CP,
    5. Rossy E,
    6. Mori L,
    7. Cosman D,
    8. De Libero G,
    9. Wodnar-Filipowicz A
    . Ligands for natural killer cell-activating receptors are expressed upon the maturation of normal myelomonocytic cells but at low levels in acute myeloid leukemias. Blood  2005; 105: 3615–3622. pmid:15657183
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  164. 164.
    1. Rohner A,
    2. Langenkamp U,
    3. Siegler U,
    4. Kalberer CP,
    5. Wodnar-Filipowicz A
    . Differentiation-promoting drugs up-regulate NKG2D ligand expression and enhance the susceptibility of acute myeloid leukemia cells to natural killer cell-mediated lysis. Leuk Res 2007; 31: 1393–1402. pmid:17391757
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  165. 165.
    1. Boissel N,
    2. Rea D,
    3. Tieng V,
    4. Dulphy N,
    5. Brun M,
    6. Cayuela JM,
    7. Rousselot P,
    8. Tamouza R,
    9. Le Bouteiller P,
    10. Mahon FX,
    11. Steinle A,
    12. Charron D,
    13. Dombret H,
    14. Toubert A
    . BCR/ABL oncogene directly controls MHC class I chain-related molecule A expression in chronic myelogenous leukemia. J Immunol  2006; 176: 5108–5116. pmid:16585609
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  166. 166.
    1. Sconocchia G,
    2. Lau M,
    3. Provenzano M,
    4. Rezvani K,
    5. Wongsena W,
    6. Fujiwara H,
    7. Hensel N,
    8. Melenhorst J,
    9. Li J,
    10. Ferrone S,
    11. Barrett AJ
    . The antileukemia effect of HLA-matched NK and NK-T cells in chronic myelogenous leukemia involves NKG2D-target-cell interactions. Blood  2005; 106: 3666–3672. pmid:16046526
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  167. 167.
    1. Nuckel H,
    2. Switala M,
    3. Sellmann L,
    4. Horn PA,
    5. Durig J,
    6. Duhrsen U,
    7. Kuppers R,
    8. Grosse-Wilde H,
    9. Rebmann V
    . The prognostic significance of soluble NKG2D ligands in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia  2010; 24: 1152–1159. pmid:20428196
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  168. 168.
    1. Poggi A,
    2. Venturino C,
    3. Catellani S,
    4. Clavio M,
    5. Miglino M,
    6. Gobbi M,
    7. Steinle A,
    8. Ghia P,
    9. Stella S,
    10. Caligaris-Cappio F,
    11. Zocchi MR
    . Vdelta1 T lymphocytes from B-CLL patients recognize ULBP3 expressed on leukemic B cells and up-regulated by trans-retinoic acid. Cancer Res  2004; 64: 9172–9179. pmid:15604289
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  169. 169.
    1. Zhang B,
    2. Kracker S,
    3. Yasuda T,
    4. Casola S,
    5. Vanneman M,
    6. Hömig-Hölzel C,
    7. Wang Z,
    8. Derudder E,
    9. Li S,
    10. Chakraborty T,
    11. Cotter SE,
    12. Koyama S,
    13. Currie T,
    14. Freeman GJ,
    15. Kutok JL,
    16. Rodig SJ,
    17. Dranoff G,
    18. Rajewsky K
    . Immune surveillance and therapy of lymphomas driven by Epstein-Barr virus protein LMP1 in a mouse model. Cell 2012; 148: 739–751. pmid:22341446
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  170. 170.
    1. Girlanda S,
    2. Fortis C,
    3. Belloni D,
    4. Ferrero E,
    5. Ticozzi P,
    6. Sciorati C,
    7. Tresoldi M,
    8. Vicari A,
    9. Spies T,
    10. Groh V,
    11. Caligaris-Cappio F,
    12. Ferrarini M
    . MICA expressed by multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance plasma cells Costimulates pamidronate-activated gammadelta lymphocytes. Cancer Res 2005; 65: 7502–7508. pmid:16103105
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  171. 171.
    1. Maccalli C,
    2. Nonaka D,
    3. Piris A,
    4. Pende D,
    5. Rivoltini L,
    6. Castelli C,
    7. Parmiani G
    . NKG2D-mediated antitumor activity by tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and antigen-specific T-cell clones isolated from melanoma patients. Clin Cancer Res 2007; 13:7459–7468. pmid:18094430
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  172. 172.
    1. Paschen A,
    2. Sucker A,
    3. Hill B,
    4. Moll I,
    5. Zapatka M,
    6. Nguyen XD,
    7. Sim GC,
    8. Gutmann I,
    9. Hassel J,
    10. Becker JC,
    11. Steinle A,
    12. Schadendorf D,
    13. Ugurel S
    . Differential clinical significance of individual NKG2D ligands in melanoma: soluble ULBP2 as an indicator of poor prognosis superior to S100B. Clin Cancer Res  2009; 15:5208–5215. pmid:19671853
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  173. 173.
    1. Verhoeven DH,
    2. de Hooge AS,
    3. Mooiman EC,
    4. Santos SJ,
    5. ten Dam MM,
    6. Gelderblom H,
    7. Melief CJ,
    8. Hogendoorn PC,
    9. Egeler RM,
    10. van Tol MJ,
    11. Schilham MW,
    12. Lankester AC
    . NK cells recognize and lyse Ewing sarcoma cells through NKG2D and DNAM-1 receptor dependent pathways. Mol Immunol  2008; 45:3917–3925. pmid:18657862
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Cancer Immunity Archive: 13 (2)
January 2013
Volume 13, Issue 2
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by Author

Sign up for alerts

View this article with LENS

Open full page PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for sharing this Cancer Immunology Research article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
NKG2D ligands as therapeutic targets
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Cancer Immunology Research
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Cancer Immunology Research.
Citation Tools
NKG2D ligands as therapeutic targets
Paul Spear, Ming-Ru Wu, Marie-Louise Sentman and Charles L. Sentman
Cancer Immun January 1 2013 (13) (2) 8;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
NKG2D ligands as therapeutic targets
Paul Spear, Ming-Ru Wu, Marie-Louise Sentman and Charles L. Sentman
Cancer Immun January 1 2013 (13) (2) 8;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • NKG2D receptor
    • NKG2D ligands
    • Immune evasion of NKG2D-mediated immunity
    • Immunotherapies targeting NKG2D ligands
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • CTLA-4 blockade in tumor models: an overview of preclinical and translational research
  • Database of T cell-defined human tumor antigens: the 2013 update
Show more Review
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Privacy Policy
Facebook   Twitter   LinkedIn   YouTube   RSS

Articles

  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Cancer Immunology Essentials

Info for

  • Authors
  • Subscribers
  • Advertisers
  • Librarians
  • Reviewers

About Cancer Immunology Research

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Permissions
  • Submit a Manuscript
AACR logo

Copyright © 2019 by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Cancer Immunology Research
eISSN: 2326-6074
ISSN: 2326-6066

Advertisement